Fashion designers in the digital era will be expected to have a profound knowledge of programming and physical computing. Therefore, finding effective methods to adopt E-textiles in fashion education is developing imperative furtherance. E-textiles are clothes embedded with microcomputers, digital components (sensor, LED), and other electronic devices. Existing E-textile platforms, such as LilyPad Arduino tutorials, have a high entry barrier because they are complicated for students who are not familiar with programming and engineering. Additionally, the stitching step using conductive thread that makes it difficult to reuse components. This can make it prohibitively expensive for beginners, given the trial-and-error process involved in the learning. In this context, this study aims to identify effective methods to adopt E-textiles in fashion schools. To design a user-friendly application that allows students to learn more easily, we conducted a user study and acquired the feedback from students in fashion schools. Based on the result of the analysis, we developed two versions of a web-based tool called Virtual Prototyping for E-textiles learning. One version included a task-oriented method while the other adopted a more explorative-oriented method. Users can connect virtually with electronic parts, practice programming, and learn circuit diagrams while using the application. We compared our prototype with an existing program through a user test on “perceived usability,” “applicability,” and “learning effect.” Results show that our prototype can be applied to fashion schools in the near future. It will also be beneficial to studies in related design fields.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adamo, O. B., Guturu, P., & Varanasi, M. R. (2009). An innovative method of teaching digital system design in an undergraduate electrical and computer engineering curriculum. In 2009 IEEE international conference on microelectronic systems education (pp. 25–28). Piscataway: IEEE.
Ankiewicz, P., De Swardt, E., & De Vries, M. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,16(2), 117–141.
Apostel, L. (1972). Interdisciplinarity problems of teaching and research in universities. Monterey: ERIC.
Armstrong, C., & LeHew, M. (2014). Barriers and mechanisms for the integration of sustainability in textile and apparel education: Stories from the front line. Fashion Practice,6(1), 59–85.
Benyon, D. (2014). Designing interactive systems: A comprehensive guide to HCI, UX and interaction design. London: Pearson.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bristow, H. W. (2004). Context awareness for wearable computers. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review,86(6), 84.
Buechley, L. (2006). A construction kit for electronic textiles. In 2006 10th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 83–90). New York: IEEE.
Buechley, L., Peppler, K., Eisenberg, M., & Yasmin, K. (2013). Textile messages: Dispatches from the world of E-textiles and education. New literacies and digital epistemologies (Vol. 62). New York: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
Bugg, J. (2009). Fashion at the Interface: Designer—wearer—viewer. Fashion Practice,1(1), 9–31.
Chapanis, A. (1961). Men, machines, and models. American Psychologist,16(3), 113.
Cherenack, K., & van Pieterson, L. (2012). Smart textiles: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Applied Physics,112(9), 091301.
Cooke, N. J. (1999). Knowledge elicitation. Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 479–509). Hoboken: Wiley.
Council, N. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
De Vries, M. (2001). The history of industrial research laboratories as a resource for teaching about science-technology relationships. Research in Science Education,31(1), 15–28.
d.School. Stanford University. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://dschool.stanford.edu.
Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education,94(1), 103–120.
Ertas, A., Frias, K. M., Tate, D., & Back, S. M. (2015). Shifting engineering education from disciplinary totransdisciplinary practice. The International Journal of Engineering Education,31(1), 94–105.
Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Why do students present different design objectives in engineering design projects? International Journal of Technology and Design Education,28(4), 1039–1060.
Farren, A., & Hutchison, A. J. T. (2004). Digital clothes: Active, dynamic, and virtual textiles and garments. Textile,2(3), 290–307.
Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Searle, K.A. (2012). Functional aesthetics for learning: Creative tensions in youth e-textiles designs. In The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Volume 1, Full Papers. International Society of the Learning Sciences: Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 196-203.
Filippidis, S. K., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2009). On the use of adaptive instructional images based on the sequential–global dimension of the Felder-Silverman learning style theory. Interactive Learning Environments,17(2), 135–150.
Fisher, K. M. (1992). SemNet: A tool for personal knowledge construction. Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 63–75). Berlin: Springer.
Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,1(1), 39–60.
Holzinger, A., Nischelwitzer, A., & Meisenberger, M. (2005). Mobile phones as a challenge for m-learning: examples for mobile interactive learning objects (MILOs). In Third IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (pp. 307–311) New York: IEEE.
Jantsch, E. (1972). Inter-and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education and innovation. Higher Education,1(1), 7–37.
Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Semantic networking as cognitive tools. Cognitive tools for learning, (pp. 12–22). Berlin: Springer.
Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Searle, K.A. (2012). Making learning visible: Connecting crafts, circuitry & coding in e-textile designs. In The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Volume 1, Full Papers. International Society of the Learning Sciences: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 188-195.
Karppinen, S., Kallunki, V., & Komulainen, K. (2019). Interdisciplinary craft designing and invention pedagogy in teacher education: student teachers creating smart textiles. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,29(1), 57–74.
Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. Computer applications for security, control and system engineering (pp. 115–121). New York: Springer.
Klein, J. T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., & Welti, M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: an effective way for managing complexity. Berlin: Springer.
Knörig, A., Wettach, R., & Cohen, J. (2009). Fritzing: A tool for advancing electronic prototyping for designers. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction (pp. 351–358) Cambridge: ACM.
Kommers, P. A., Jonassen, D. H., Mayes, J. T., & Ferreira, A. (1992). Cognitive tools for learning. Berlin: Springer.
Lamontagne, V. (2013). Open wearables: Crafting fashion-tech. Nordes. 1(5).
Lau, W. W., Ngai, G., Chan, S. C., & Cheung, J. C. (2009). Learning programming through fashion and design: a pilot summer course in wearable computing for middle school students. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 504–508). Cambridge: ACM.
Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Deciphering interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary contributions. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science,1(1), 125–130.
Lee, J., Kim, D., Ryoo, H.-Y., & Shin, B.-S. J. S. (2016). Sustainable wearables: Wearable technology for enhancing the quality of human life. Sustainability,8(5), 466.
Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12. Usability Interface,8(2), 3–6.
Lymberis, A. (2003). Smart wearable systems for personalised health management: Current R&D and future challenges. In Proceedings of the 25th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (pp. 3716–3719). New York: IEEE.
Marculescu, D., Marculescu, R., Zamora, N. H., Stanley-Marbell, P., Khosla, P. K., Park, S., et al. (2003). Electronic textiles: A platform for pervasive computing. Proceedings of the IEEE,91(12), 1995–2018.
Martin, T., Kim, K., Forsyth, J., McNair, L., Coupey, E., & Dorsa, E. (2011). An interdisciplinary undergraduate design course for wearable and pervasive computing products. In 2011 15th annual international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC) (pp. 61–68) New York: IEEE.
Martin, R., & Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard: Harvard Business Press.
McCann, J., & Bryson, D. (2009). Smart clothes and wearable technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Monterey: ERIC.
Ngai, G., Chan, S. C., Cheung, J. C., & Lau, W. W. (2009). The TeeBoard: An education-friendly construction platform for E-textiles and wearable computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 249–258). Cambridge: ACM.
Otero, V., Peressini, D., Meymaris, K. A., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., et al. (2005). Integrating technology into teacher education: A critical framework for implementing reform. Journal of Teacher Education,56(1), 8–23.
Pantouvaki, S. J. S. (2014). Embodied interactions: Towards an exploration of the expressive and narrative potential of performance costume through wearable technologies. Scene,2(1–2), 179–196.
Park, S., Chung, K., & Jayaraman, S. (2015). Wearables: Fundamentals, advancements, and a roadmap for the future. Wearable sensors (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. In IFIP international conference on network and parallel computing (pp. 320–327) Berlin: Springer.
Peppler, K. A. (2013). STEAM-powered computing education: Using E-textiles to integrate the arts and STEM. IEEE Computer,46(9), 38–43.
Petrosino, A. J., Gustafson, K. A., & Shekhar, P. (2016). STEM Integration: A Study examining the enactment of prescribed Research Based Engineering Curriculum. International Journal of Engineering Education,32(1), 219–229.
Pohl, C., & Hadorn, G. H. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Munich: oekom.
Qiu, K., Buechley, L., Baafi, E., & Dubow, W. (2013). A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 20–27). Cambridge: ACM.
IDEO. IDEO. Retrieved September 7, 2018, from http://designthinkingforeducators.com.
Rieman, J. (1996). A field study of exploratory learning strategies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI),3(3), 189–218.
Schar, S. G., & Krueger, H. (2000). Using new learning technologies with multimedia. IEEE Multimedia,7(3), 40–51.
Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,27(3), 459–480.
Seymour, S. (2008). Fashionable technology: The intersection of design, fashion, science, and technology. Berlin: Springer.
Slotnick, S. (1997). Beauty & the Bits project. MIT Media Lab. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from https://www.media.mit.edu/videos/ml-wearables-fashion-show-1997-10-15/.
Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Berlin: Springer.
Ünay, F. G., Zehir, C. J. P.-S., & Sciences, B. (2012). Innovation intelligence and entrepreneurship in the fashion industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,41, 315–321.
Viitanen, J. (2011). Contextual inquiry method for user-centred clinical IT system design. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,169, 965–969.
Von Thienen, J. P., Clancey, W. J., Corazza, G. E., & Meinel, C. (2018). Theoretical foundations of design thinking. Design thinking research (pp. 13–40). Berlin: Springer.
Wallace, J. E. (2014). Exploring the design potential of wearable technology and functional fashion. University of Cincinnati.
Watkins, S. M. (1988). Using the design process to teach functional apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,7(1), 10–14.
Williams, D. (2014). Fashioning the future. Fashion Practice,6(1), 131–140.
Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, A., Wohn, K. & Ahn, J. Towards new fashion design education: learning virtual prototyping using E-textiles. Int J Technol Des Educ (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09558-w
- Virtual prototyping