Collaborative sketching in crowdsourcing design: a new method for idea generation

Article

Abstract

Design integrates concepts and solves problems. Crowdsourcing design imports vast knowledge and produces creative ideas. It publishes design tasks, collects dozens of contributors’ ideas and reward the best. Contributors in crowdsourcing design work individually when generating ideas. However, those who collaborate could make better use of crowd’s knowledge, which might produce ideas of higher quality. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of crowdsourcing design, this article proposes a collaborative crowdsourcing design method that integrates crowd’s sketching processes. This method uses a tree to arrange crowd’s ideas and enable flexible modifications of prior ideas. A demonstration system named Sketchfans is developed, and the results of a crowdsourcing sketching experiment using this system are presented. The experimental results validate that this method is effective; participants rely heavily on the idea tree for inspiration, and the best ideas appear around the ends of branches on the idea tree. Moreover, participants displayed unique development patterns. They often developed high-quality ideas from initial ideas that were regarded as poor quality. The demonstration system Sketchfans, supports this method well. Finally, we optimize Sketchfans based on analysis of participants’ activities and feedback.

Keywords

Idea generation Conceptual design Collaborative sketching Crowdsourcing 

References

  1. Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogers, M., & West, J. (2012). Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing (1st ed.). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Dean, D. L., Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L., & Santanen, E. L. (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative Ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646–698.Google Scholar
  5. Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dontcheva, M., Gerber, E., & Lewis, S. (2011). Crowdsourcing and creativity. In The ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Workshop on crowdsourcing and human computation, Vancouver, Canada, May 7–12 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Erickson, T. (2011) Some thoughts on a framework for crowdsourcing. In The ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Workshop on crowdsourcing and human computation, Vancouver, Canada, May 7–12 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Geiger, D., Rosemann, M., Fielt, E., & Schader, M. (2012) Crowdsourcing information systems-definition, typology, and design. In International conference on information systems, Orlando, USA December 16–19 2012 (Paper 53).Google Scholar
  9. Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R. C., & Schader, M. (2011) Managing the crowd: Towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. In Americas conference on information systems, Detroit, Michigan, August 4–8 2011 (Paper 430).Google Scholar
  10. Goldschmidt, G. (1997). Capturing indeterminism: Representation in the design problem space. Design Studies, 18(4), 441–455. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00011-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haymaker, J., Keel, P., Ackermann, E., & Porter, W. (2000). Filter mediated design: Generating coherence in collaborative design. Design Studies, 21(2), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe, J. (2006a). Crowdsourcing: A definition. Crowdsourcing: Tracking the rise of the amateur. http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html.
  13. Howe, J. (2006b). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 1–4.Google Scholar
  14. Jain, R. (2010). Investigation of governance mechanisms for crowdsourcing initiatives. In Americas conference on information systems, Lima, Peru, August 12–15 2010 (Paper 557).Google Scholar
  15. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., et al. (2013). The future of crowd work. Paper presented at the the 16th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, San Antonio, USA, February 23–27.Google Scholar
  16. Kudrowitz, B., Te, P., & Wallace, D. (2012). The influence of sketch quality on perception of product-idea creativity. AI EDAM, 26(Special Issue 03), 267–279. doi:10.1017/S0890060412000145.
  17. Kudrowitz, B., & Wallace, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(2), 120–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehoux, P., Hivon, M., Williams-Jones, B., & Urbach, D. (2011). The worlds and modalities of engagement of design participants: A qualitative case study of three medical innovations. Design Studies, 32(4), 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: Understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(3). doi:10.1115/1.4003498.
  20. Malone, T., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2009). Harnessing crowds: Mapping the genome of collective intelligence. Research Paper No. 4732-09, MIT.Google Scholar
  21. Morris, R. R., Dontcheva, M., Finkelstein, A., & Gerber, E. (2013). Affect and creative performance on crowdsourcing platforms. In Affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), 2013 humaine association conference on, 2013 (pp. 67–72), IEEE.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737–743. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nickerson, J., & Sakamoto, Y. (2010). Crowdsourcing creativity: Combining ideas in networks. In Workshop on information in networks, New York, USA, September 24–25 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Oman, S. K., Tumer, I. Y., Wood, K., & Seepersad, C. (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pache, M. W. (2005). Sketching for conceptual design. Empirical results and future tools. Munich: Technischen Universität München.Google Scholar
  26. Pahl, G., Wallace, K., & Blessing, L. T. M. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pei, E. (2009). Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers & engineering designers. Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  28. Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88(2), 93–134. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Restrepo, J., & Christiaans, H. (2004). Problem structuring and information access in design. Journal of Design Research, 4(2), 1551–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Summers, J. D., & Kulkarni, S. (2001). Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch)—An idea generation technique for engineering design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 168–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sim, S. K., & Duffy, A. H. (2003). Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research in Engineering Design, 14(4), 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Wang, C., & Huang, Q. (2014). Creative segment: A descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching. Design Studies, 35(1), 54–79. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suwa, M., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. A. (1998). The roles of sketches in early conceptual design processes In Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  35. Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21(6), 539–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Fasiha, M. Y. N., Goka, M., Mukai, F., Nagai, Y., et al. (2012). Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: A research method for difficult-to-observe design-thinking processes. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Temple, S. (1994). Thought made visible: The value of sketching. Co-Design Journal, 1, 16–25.Google Scholar
  38. Tidball, B., Mulder, I., & Stappers, P. J. (2011). Online design contests: A network of inspiration for designers. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th world conference on design research, IASDR, 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, October 31–November 4.Google Scholar
  39. Wooten, J., & Ulrich, K. (2011). Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Available at SSRN 1838733.Google Scholar
  40. Yu, L., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Cooks or cobblers? Crowd creativity through combination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2011 (pp. 1393–1402), ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lingyun Sun
    • 1
  • Wei Xiang
    • 1
  • Shi Chen
    • 1
  • Zhiyuan Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Modern Industrial Design InstituteZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations