Exploring the capability of evaluating technical solutions: a collaborative study into the primary technology classroom
- 676 Downloads
Within the field of technology education, evaluating technical solutions is considered as an important topic. Research indicates that pupils have difficulties in evaluating technical solutions in terms of fitness for purpose, i.e. how effective a technical solution supports its intended function. By using the learning study, which is an iterative and collaborative research approach, the study explores the capability to evaluate technical solutions in terms of fitness for purpose, what it takes to know it and how to best enhance its learning in the primary technology classroom. Audio and video recorded interviews, teachers’ meetings and lessons are the base data for the study. A contribution of the study is the understanding of this specific knowing, and what is critical for learning and thus to an improvement of technology teaching practice.
KeywordsPrimary technology education Fitness for purpose Function Teaching Learning Learning study
- Barlex, D. (2007). Assessing capability in design and technology: The case for a minimally invasive approach. Design and technology: An International Journal, 12(2), 49–56.Google Scholar
- Barlex, D. (2011). Dear minister, this is why design and technology is a very important subject in the school curriculum. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(3), 9–18.Google Scholar
- Benenson, G. (2001). Teachers researching, children designing. Journal of Technology Education, 12(2), 56–68.Google Scholar
- Carlgren, I. (2007) The content of schooling—from knowledge and subject matter to knowledge formation and subject specific ways of knowing. In E. Forsberg (Ed.), Curriculum Theory Revisited. Studies in educational policy and educational philosophy: Research reports 2007:10. Uppsala University. pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
- Chatoney, M. (2008). Contemplation and use of technical aids in primary schools. In J. Ginestié (Ed.), The cultural transmission of artefacts, skills and knowledge: Eleven studies in technology education in France (pp. 125–147). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Compton, V. & Compton, A. (2011). Teaching the nature of technology: Determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design education. http://www04.sub.su.se:2112/ content/k0v57q33r8562g75/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2012.
- de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Granath, J. Å. (2005). Learning in technology: A design theoretical approach to architecture education. In: L. Lindström (Ed.) Technology education in new perspectives: Research, assessment and curriculum development (pp. 144–160). Stockholm Library of Curriculum Studies 14. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. D., & Daugherty, J. (2008). Quality and characteristics of recent research in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
- Jones, A., Buntting, C. & de Vries, M. J. (2011). The developing field of technology education: a review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. http://www04.sub.su.se:2112/content/m0011512152471n1/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2012.
- Landqvist, J. (2001). Vilda idéer och djuplodande analys: Om designmetodikens grunder. [Wild ideas and in-depth analysis: About the basis for design methodology]. Institutionen för Industridesign, Konstfack (National College of Art Craft and Design). Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. (2000). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development (pp. 24–28). New Orleans: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Merrill, C. (2004). Action research and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 63(8), 6–8.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (2007). Technology Curriculum Support. http://www.techlink.org.nz/ curriculum-support. Accessed 7 Sept 2012.
- National Agency for Education, Sweden (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2687. Accessed 7 September 2012.
- Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306.Google Scholar
- Runesson, U., & Gustafsson, G. (2010). Learning study—knowledge production for teachers? Paper presented at the World Association of Lesson Studies International Conference, Brunei, Darusalam, 9–10 December.Google Scholar
- Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Balitmore and London: The John Hopkins university press.Google Scholar