Embedded creativity: teaching design thinking via distance education

Article

Abstract

This paper shows how the design thinking skills of students learning at a distance can be consciously developed, and deliberately applied outside of the creative industries in what are termed ‘embedded’ contexts. The distance learning model of education pioneered by The Open University is briefly described before the technological innovations—which feature a fully integrated web 2.0 learning environment and design studio—and concepts behind a new course in Design Thinking are explained in detail. In teaching the more generic skills of design and developing experiential knowledge in students, the paper also explores the changing role of designers in becoming less problem-focussed and more socially engaged through the construction of design process. The paper ends by presenting the results of an extensive student and tutor survey as part of an ongoing longitudinal study which indicate that this new approach to teaching design has been successful.

Keywords

Design thinking Embedded creativity Virtual design studio Distance education Reflective practice Integrated learning environment 

References

  1. Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2009). Design thinking. London: Ava Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Brandt, C., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2011). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.Google Scholar
  3. Brocato, K. (2009). Studio based learning: Proposing, critiquing, Iterating our way to person-centredness for better classroom management. Theory into Practice, 48, 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, T. (2009) Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Collins Business.Google Scholar
  6. Chiu, S.-H. (2010). Student’s knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio: An exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gold, R. (2007). The plenitude: Creativity, innovation, and making stuff. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ham, J., & Schnabel, M. (2011). Web 2.0 virtual design studio: Social networking as facilitator of design education. Architectural Science Review, 54, 108–116.Google Scholar
  9. Higgs, P., Cunningham, S., & Bakhshi, H. (2008) Beyond the creative industries: Mapping the creative economy in the United Kingdom. NESTA Technical Report. http://tinyurl.com/6aa6d5d.
  10. Kvan, T. (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lockwood, T. (2009). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, R. (2009). Design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Chichester: Capstone.Google Scholar
  14. Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H. (2009). On-line critiques in collaborative design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, K. (2011). Curiositas and Studiositas: Investigating student curiosity and the design studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Waks, L. (2001). Donald Schön’s philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Maths, Computing, and TechnologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations