Advertisement

Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment

  • Kuo-Hung TsengEmail author
  • Chi-Cheng Chang
  • Shi-Jer Lou
  • Wen-Ping Chen
Article

Abstract

Many scholars claimed the integration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education is beneficial to the national economy and teachers and institutes have been working to develop integrated education programs. This study examined a project-based learning (PjBL) activity that integrated STEM using survey and interview methods. The participants were 30 freshmen with engineering related backgrounds from five institutes of technology in Taiwan. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to examine student attitudes towards STEM before and after the PjBL activity. The results of the survey showed that students’ attitudes to the subject of engineering changed significantly. Most of the students recognized the importance of STEM in the science and engineering disciplines; they mentioned in interview that the possession of professional science knowledge is useful to their future career and that technology may improve our lives and society, making the world a more convenient and efficient place. In conclusion, combining PjBL with STEM can increase effectiveness, generate meaningful learning and influence student attitudes in future career pursuit. Students are positive towards combining PjBL with STEM.

Keywords

Project-based learning (PjBL) STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) Learning attitude Multi-function electronic vehicle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the financial support provided by Taiwan’s National Science Council, the Republic of China, and also the kind assistance of Miss Chao-I Chu and Miss Hui-Chuan Sun who made this paper possible.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besterfield-Sacre M., Moreno M., Shuman L. J., & Atman C. J. (1999). Comparing entering freshman engineers: Institutional differences in student attitudes. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
  3. Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2007). Engineering students’ conceptions of the derivative and some implications for their mathematical education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(6), 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boser, R. A., Palmer, J. D., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students attitudes towards technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4–19.Google Scholar
  5. Bragg, L. (2007). Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catherine, M., & Barry, J. F. (2008). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative science course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 163–190.Google Scholar
  7. ChanLin, L. J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawley, F. E., & Coe, A. S. (1990). Determinants of middle school students’ intention to enroll in a high school science course: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David, G. H., & Sharon, K. S. (2006). Proceedings of the conference on K-12 outreach from university science departments. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://www.science-house.org/conf/conf02/proceedings.pdf.
  11. Dewaters, J., S. E. Powers. (2006). Improving science and energy literacy through project-based K-12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes. Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes towards science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldin, G. A. (2003). Developing complex understandings: On the relationship of mathematics education research in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., & Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science, and technology in key stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 21, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillel, J., & Perrett, G. (2006). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of mathematics: An international study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 439–459.Google Scholar
  18. Hilpert, J., Stump, G., Husman, J., & Kim, W. (2008). An exploratory factor analysis of the Pittsburgh freshman engineering attitudes survey. The 386th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in education conference, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins, E. W. (2006). Student opinion in England about science and technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karaman, S., & Celik, S. (2008). An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krajcik, J. S., Czeniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar
  23. Laughlin, C. D., Zastavker, Y. V., & Ong, M. (2007). Is integration really there? students’ perceptions of integration in their project-based curriculum. The 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  24. Mamlok-Naaman, R., Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein, A., Menis, J., & Erduran, S. (2005). Learning science through a historical approach: Does it affect the attitudes of non-science-oriented students towards science? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mioduser, D., & Betzer, N. (2007). The contribution of project-based-learning to high-achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myers, D. G. (1993). Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Nolen, S. B. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norwich, B., & Duncan, J. (1990). Attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived preventive factors, intention and learning science: Testing a modified theory of reasoned action. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
  30. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piburin, M. D., & Baker, D. R. (1993). If I were the teacher: qualitative study of attitude towards science. Science Education, 77(4), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Oliver, S., & Johnson, D. (2006). A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rees, H., & Noyes, J. M. (2007). Mobile telephones, computers, and the internet: Sex differences in adolescents’ use and attitudes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 482–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (2000). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, K., Granvile, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Education Research, 95(6), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.Google Scholar
  38. Stone, J. R., I. I. I., Alfeld, C., & Pearson, D. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, California: Autodesk.Google Scholar
  40. Utsumi, M. C., & Mendes, C. R. (2000). Researching the attitudes towards mathematics in basic education. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsh, K. A. (2008). The relationship among mathematics anxiety, beliefs about mathematics, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics performance in associate degree nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(4), 226–229.Google Scholar
  42. Zastavker, Y. V., Ong, M., & Page, L. (2006). Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program. The 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuo-Hung Tseng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chi-Cheng Chang
    • 2
  • Shi-Jer Lou
    • 3
  • Wen-Ping Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Business and ManagementMeiho UniversityPingtung County, PingtungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Technology Application and Human Resource DevelopmentNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Graduate Institute of Vocational and Technical EducationNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyPingtung CountyTaiwan

Personalised recommendations