Student response to an Internet-mediated industrial design studio course
- 412 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to investigate student attitudes towards and perceptions of using the Internet and information technology to mediate a design studio course and to propose guidelines and suggestions for developing Internet-mediated design studio courses. Two classes of third-year undergraduate industrial design students in two collaborating universities in Taiwan—Chang Gung University and National Yunlin University of Science and Technology—participated in an experimental design studio course mediated with an online design learning environment. Surveys and focus group interviews were conducted at the end of the course to record students’ attitudes and perceptions. The students thought that the approach used had a positive influence on design teaching and learning and expressed acceptance of using the Internet to support design education. Finally, suggestions were proposed to help design educators in adopting, modifying, and developing systems for using the Internet to mediate design studio courses.
KeywordsDesign education Design students Design studio Industrial design Internet Online design learning environment
This research was partially supported by a grant from the National Science Council (NSC) (NSC 92-2520-S-182-002). In addition, the authors wish to express their appreciation to all the teachers and students who participated in the experimental courses.
- Abrams, G., & Haefner, J. (2002). Blending online and traditional instruction in the mathematics classroom. The Technology Source Archive, retried January 5, 2008, from http://technologysource.org/article/blending_online_and_traditional_instruction_in_the_mathematics_classroom/.
- Arsham, H. (2002). Impact of the Internet on learning and teaching. USDLA Journal, 16(3). Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAR02_Issue/article01.html.
- Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114–122.Google Scholar
- Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern Internet-based design studios. Presented at the Apple University Consortium Conference, Digital Voyages, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
- Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001). Design knowledge and learning: A socially mediated activity. In C. Eastman, W. McCracken & W. Newsletter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 297–314). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Chen, W., & You, M. (2003). A framework for the development of online design learning environment. Presented at the 6th Asian Design International Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.Google Scholar
- Cheng, Y.-W. (2000). Web-based teamwork in design education. Presented at Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital (SIGRADI) 2000, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
- Dyson, M. C., & Campello, S. B. (2003). Evaluating virtual learning environments: What are we measuring? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
- Forgber, U., & Russell, P. (1999). Interdisciplinary collaboration in the virtual design studio. Presented at the European Association of Architectural Education (EAAE) 17th International Conference, Plymouth, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- Gillani, B. B. (2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environments. Oxford University Press of America: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Gunn, C. (1997). CAL evaluation: Future directions. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
- Harmon, S. W., & Jones, M. G. (1999). The five levels of Web use in education: Factors to consider in planning online courses. Educational Technology, 39(6), 28–32.Google Scholar
- Jones, A., Barnard, J., Calder, J., Scanlon, E., & Thompson, J. (2000). Evaluating learning and teaching technologies in further education. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 8(3), 56–66.Google Scholar
- Kvan, T. (2001b). The problem in studio teaching—revisiting the pedagogy of studio teaching. Presented at the 1st ARCASIA Committee on Architectural Education (ACAE) Conference on Architectural Education, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
- Nam, T. J. (2001). Computer support for collaborative design: Analysis of tools for an integrated collaborative design environment. Presented at the 5th Asian Design Conference, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
- Press, M., & Cooper, R. (2003). The design experience: The role of design and designers in the twenty-first century. England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, E., Jones, A., Barnard, J., Thompson, J., & Calder, J. (2000). Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 101–107.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio. London: Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA).Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1987). Education: The reflective practitioner. London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Van Eijl, P., & Pilot, A. (2003). Using a virtual learning environment in collaborative learning: Criteria for success. Educational Technology, 43(2), 55.Google Scholar
- Wood, J. (2003). A report on the use of ICT in art and design. Coventry, United Kingdom: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA).Google Scholar
- Yee, S. (2001). Building communities for design education: Using telecommunication technology for remote collaborative learning using telecommunication technology for remote collaborative learning. PhD Dissertation, MIT. Massachusetts, USA: Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Zimring, C., & Craig, D. L. (2001). Defining design between domains: An argument for design research? In C. Eastman, W. McCracken & W. Newsletter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 125–146). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar