Advertisement

Production location of multinational firms under transfer pricing: the impact of the arm’s length principle

  • Hayato Kato
  • Hirofumi Okoshi
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

When multinational enterprises (MNEs) separate the geographical location of affiliates, they can shift profits between the affiliates by manipulating intra-firm prices of inputs. We show that if the international tax difference between the parent and the host countries is large, MNEs choose to separately locate their affiliates in the two countries. We also investigate the impact of the arm’s length principle (ALP) on the location choice, which requires that the intra-firm price of inputs should be set equal to the price of similar inputs for the independent downstream firms. The ALP may change the location choice of MNEs, bringing smaller tax revenues to the host country, but greater revenues globally.

Keywords

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) Transfer pricing Production location choice Intra-firm trade Arm’s length principle (ALP) 

JEL Classification

F12 F23 H25 H26 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the valuable comments from two anonymous referees. Thanks are also due to David Agrawal, Jay Pil Choi, Dave Donaldson, Taiji Furusawa, Makoto Hasegawa, Andreas Haufler, Jota Ishikawa, Michael Keen, Kozo Kiyota, Yoshimasa Komoriya, Christopher Ludwig, Yasusada Murata, Ben Lockwood, Yukihiro Nishimura, Hikaru Ogawa, Toshihiro Okubo, Pascalis Raimondos, Yasuhiro Sato, Nicolas Schmitt, Yoichi Sugita, Kimiko Terai, Eiichi Tomiura, and Lorenzo Trimarchi for helpful suggestions. This paper was presented at HITS-MJT (Kanazawa Seiryo U), Hitotsubashi-Sogang Trade Workshop (Hitotsubashi U), Public Economics Workshop (U of Tokyo), Study Group on Spatial Economics (Kyushu Sangyo U), JSIE Kanto Meeting (Nihon U), International Symposium of Urban Economics and Public Economics (Osaka U), Applied Economics Workshop (Keio U), Australasian Trade Workshop (U of Auckland), 17th GEP/CEPR Annual Postgraduate Conference (U of Nottingham), Public Economics Seminar (LMU), and International Institute of Public Finance (U of Tampere). Financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Number: JP16J01228), the MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (Grant Number: JPS1391003), the Obayashi Foundation, the Japan Legislatic Society Foundation, and the German Research Foundation through GRK are gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are our responsibility.

References

  1. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2007). The rise and fall of arm’s length: A study in the evolution of US international taxation. Law & Economics Working Papers. University of Michigan Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartelsman, E. J., & Beetsma, R. M. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9), 2225–2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, C. J., & Langenmayr, D. (2013). Sorting into outsourcing: Are profits taxed at a gorilla’s arm’s length? Journal of International Economics, 90(2), 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard, A. B, Jensen, J. B, & Schott, P. K. (2006). Transfer pricing by US-based multinational firms. NBER Working Paper, 12493Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010). Intra-firm trade and product contractibility (long version). NBER Working Paper, 15881Google Scholar
  6. Bjorvatn, K., & Eckel, C. (2006). Policy competition for foreign direct investment between asymmetric countries. European Economic Review, 50(7), 1891–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blonigen, B. A. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(4), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choe, C., & Matsushima, N. (2013). The arm’s length principle and tacit collusion. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(1), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi, J. P., Furusawa, T., & Ishikawa, J. (2018). Transfer pricing and the arm’s length principle under imperfect competition. Discussion Paper Series HIAS-E-73. Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
  10. Clausing, K. A. (2003). Tax-motivated transfer pricing and US intrafirm trade prices. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9), 2207–2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Copithorne, L. W. (1971). International corporate transfer prices and government policy. Canadian Journal of Economics, 4(3), 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cristea, A. D., & Nguyen, D. X. (2016). Transfer pricing by multinational firms: New evidence from foreign firm ownerships. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 170–202.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, R. B., Martin, J., Parenti, M., & Toubal, F. (2018). Knocking on tax haven’s door: Multinational firms and transfer pricing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egger, P., & Seidel, T. (2013). Corporate taxes and intra-firm trade. European Economic Review, 63, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elitzur, R., & Mintz, J. (1996). Transfer pricing rules and corporate tax competition. Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrett, B., & Wooton, I. (2010). Competing for a duopoly: International trade and tax competition. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(3), 776–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furusawa, T., Hori, K., & Wooton, I. (2015). A race beyond the bottom: The nature of bidding for a firm. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(3), 452–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gresik, T. A., & Osmundsen, P. (2008). Transfer pricing in vertically integrated industries. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(3), 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffith, R., Miller, H., & O’Connell, M. (2014). Ownership of intellectual property and corporate taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 112, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gumpert, A., Hines, J. R, Jr., & Schnitzer, M. (2016). Multinational firms and tax havens. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guvenen, F., Mataloni, Jr R. J., Rassier, D. G., & Ruhl, K. J. (2017). Offshore profit shifting and domestic productivity measurement. NBER Working Paper, 23324Google Scholar
  22. Hanson, G. H., Mataloni, R. J, Jr., & Slaughter, M. J. (2005). Vertical production networks in multinational firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 664–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haufler, A., & Mardan, M. (2014). Cross-border loss offset can fuel tax competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haufler, A., & Wooton, I. (1999). Country size and tax competition for foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 71(1), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haufler, A., & Wooton, I. (2006). The effects of regional tax and subsidy coordination on foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 50(2), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hebous, S., Ruf, M., & Weichenrieder, A. J. (2011). The effects of taxation on the location decision of multinational firms: M&A versus greenfield investments. National Tax Journal, 64(3), 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horst, T. (1971). The theory of the multinational firm: Optimal behavior under different tariff and tax rates. Journal of Political Economy, 79(5), 1059–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ishikawa, J., Raimondos, P., & Zhang, X. (2017). Transfer pricing rules under imperfect competition. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  29. Kant, C. (1988). Foreign subsidiary, transfer pricing and tariffs. Southern Economic Journal, 55(1), 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karkinsky, T., & Riedel, N. (2012). Corporate taxation and the choice of patent location within multinational firms. Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kato, H., & Okoshi, H. (2017). Production location of multinational firms under transfer pricing: The impact of the arm’s length principle. Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2017-016, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio UniversityGoogle Scholar
  32. Keen, M., & Konrad, K. A. (2013). The theory of international tax competition and coordination. In A. J. Auerbach, R. Chetty, M. Feldstein, & E. Saez (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 5, pp. 257–328). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keuschnigg, C., & Devereux, M. P. (2013). The arm’s length principle and distortions to multinational firm organization. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kind, H. J., Midelfart, K. H., & Schjelderup, G. (2005). Corporate tax systems, multinational enterprises, and economic integration. Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lanz, R., & Miroudot, S. (2011). Intra-firm trade. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, 114Google Scholar
  36. Ma, J., & Raimondos, P. (2015). Competition for FDI and profit shifting. CESifo Working Paper Series, 5153Google Scholar
  37. Markusen, J. R. (2004). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Navaretti, G. B., & Venables, A. (2004). Multinational firms in the world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nielsen, S. B., Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schjelderup, G. (2003). Formula apportionment and transfer pricing under oligopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5(2), 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nielsen, S. B., Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schjelderup, G. (2008). Taxes and decision rights in multinationals. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(2), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD. (2017). OECD transfer pricing guidelines for multinational enterprises and tax administrations 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Samuelson, L. (1982). The multinational firm with arm’s length transfer price limits. Journal of International Economics, 13(3–4), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schjelderup, G., & Sørgard, L. (1997). Transfer pricing as a strategic device for decentralized multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 4(3), 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slaughter, M. J. (2000). Production transfer within multinational enterprises and American wages. Journal of International Economics, 50(2), 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swenson, D. L. (2001). Tax reforms and evidence of transfer pricing. National Tax Journal, 54(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Voget, J. (2011). Relocation of headquarters and international taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1067–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wittendorff, J. (2012). Consistency: Domestic vs. international transfer pricing law. Tax Notes International, 1127–1134Google Scholar
  48. Yao, J. T. (2013). The arm’s length principle, transfer pricing, and location choices. Journal of Economics and Business, 65, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao, L. (2000). Decentralization and transfer pricing under oligopoly. Southern Economic Journal, 67(2), 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsKeio UniversityMinato-kuJapan
  2. 2.Munich Graduate School of Economics, Seminar for Economic PolicyUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations