International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 919–965 | Cite as

Commodity taxation and regulatory competition

  • Simone MoriconiEmail author
  • Pierre M. Picard
  • Skerdilajda Zanaj


The purpose of this paper is twofold. We first investigate whether product market regulations affect commodity taxation in open-to-trade economies, and second, we study the strategic interaction in regulatory measures between trading partner countries. We present a two-country general equilibrium model in which destination-based commodity taxes finance public goods, and product market regulation affects both the number of firms in the market and product diversity. Based on data for 21 OECD countries over the 1990–2008 period, we provide empirical evidence suggesting that product market regulations are strategic complement policies and that domestic regulations have a negative impact on domestic commodity taxation.


Regulation Commodity tax Strategic interactions 

JEL Classification

F0 H1 H7 H87 L5 



We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for very useful comments. We also thank Michel Beine, Marie-Laure Breuillé, Jan K. Brueckner, Giacomo De Giorgi, Andreas Haufler, Anders Jensen, Anastasia Litina, Mathieu Parenti, Michele Pellizzari, Stephane Riou, Grégoire Rota Graziosi, Claus Thustrup Kreiner for valuable comments. We also thank colleagues who attended presentations at the Universities of California Irvine, Strasbourg, Luxembourg, Milan, Brussels, Copenhagen, Lund, Aarhus, LMU Munich and the Copenhagen Business School, the 28th Annual Conference of the European Economic Association in Gothenburg, the PET conference 2013, the workshop ‘Public policies and spatial economics, 2013’ in Lyon, the 2nd InsTED Workshop 2014, the 2015 ZEW Public Finance Conference in Mannheim, the 2015 IEB Workshop on Economics of Taxation in Barcelona, the 2015 SIEP Conference in Ferrara, 1st Belgo-Japanese Public Finance workshop at CORE, 2016, for very helpful discussions. The usual disclaimer applies. This project was supported by the grant F2R-CRE-PUL-10EGQH at the University of Luxembourg.

Supplementary material

10797_2018_9521_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (210 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 210 KB)


  1. Aghion, P., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Shleifer, A. (2010). Regulation and distrust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1015–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2060–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, F., & Forslid, R. (2003). Tax competition and economic geography. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5(2), 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardelan, A. (2006). How Strong is the Love for Variety? Purdue CIBER Working Papers, No. 1-1-2006.Google Scholar
  5. Benassy, J.-P. (1996). Taste for variety and optimum production patterns in monopolistic competition. Economics Letters, 52(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisin, A., Topa, G., & Verdier, T. (2004). Religious intermarriage and socialization in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 112(3), 615–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bozzoli, C., & Mueller, C. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(S1), S89–S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canoy, M., Beutin, R., Horvath, A., Hubert, A., Lerais, F., Smith, P., et al. (2006). Migration and public perception. European Commission: Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA).Google Scholar
  11. Carey, D. & J. Rabesona, (2002). Tax ratios on labour and capital income and on consumption. OECD Economic Studies No. 35, 2002/2.Google Scholar
  12. Case, A. C., Hines, J. R, Jr., & Rosen, H. S. (1992). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the States. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castles, F. G., & Mitchell, D. (1993). Worlds of welfare and families of nations. In F. G. Castles (Ed.), Families of nations: Patterns of public policy in western democracies. Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  14. Conway, P. & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in the non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: Measurement and highlights. OECD economics department working papers , No. 530, December.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, R. B., & Vadlammanati, K. C. (2013). A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 103(2013), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dincecco, M. (2011). Political transformations and public finances: Europe (pp. 1650–1913). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.Google Scholar
  18. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doing Business (2016). Measuring regulatory quality and efficiency. Doing Business. World Bank Group, October 27, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durevall, D., & Henrekson, M. (2011). The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 708–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ethier, W. J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 389–405.Google Scholar
  23. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2016). Long-term persistence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(6), 1401–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haaland, J. I., & Wooton, I. (2007). Domestic labor markets and foreign direct investment. Review of International Economics, 15(3), 462–480, 08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haufler, A., & Pfluger, M. (2004). International commodity taxation under monopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6, 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haufler, A., & Pfluger, M. (2007). International oligopoly and the taxation of commerce with revenue-constrained Governments. Economica, 74(295), 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hindriks, J., & Myles, G. (2013). Intermediate public economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keen, M., & Lahiri, S. (1998). The comparison between destination and origin principles under imperfect competition. Journal of International Economics, 45, 323–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economy payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII, 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krugman, P. R. (1981). Intraindustry specialization and the gains from trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 89, 959–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. List, J., & Gerking, S. (2000). Regulatory Federalism and U.S. Environmental Policies. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Litina, A., & Palivos, T. (2016). Corruption, tax evasion and social values. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 124, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lockwood, B. (2001). Tax competition and tax coordination under destination and origin principles: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics, 81, 279–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lopez, L. & Weber, S. (2017). Testing for Granger causality in panel data. IRENE Working paper, 17–03; Institute of Economic Research, University of Neuchatel.Google Scholar
  40. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economics Studies, 60(3), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mintz, J., & Tulkens, H. (1986). Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation: Equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miyagiwa, K., & Sato, Y. (2014). Free entry, regulatory competition, and globalization. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oates, W. E. (2002). Fiscal and regulatory competition: Theory and Evidence. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 3(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing? Journal of Public Economics, 35, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD. (2014). Consumption Tax Trends 2014: VAT/GST and excise rates, trends and policy issues. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scholar
  46. Pinotti, P. (2012). Trust, regulation and market failures. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 650–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, 8, 677–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public spending in the 20th century: A global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2007). Doing business in 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Moriconi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Pierre M. Picard
    • 4
    • 5
  • Skerdilajda Zanaj
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Quantitative MethodsIÉSEG School of ManagementParis CedexFrance
  2. 2.Lille Economics and Management (LEM)LilleFrance
  3. 3.CESifo MunichMunichGermany
  4. 4.CREAUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg
  5. 5.COREUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Lofos NymfonLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations