Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 198–223 | Cite as

Non-tax revenue in the European Union: A source of fiscal risk?

  • Gilles Mourre
  • Adriana ReutEmail author
Policy Watch
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Despite its relevance for fiscal policy, non-tax revenue is only defined by exclusion and it is an area that has been scarcely studied for developed economies. This study is an attempt to provide an analysis of this relevant component of government revenue, using comparable national accounts data. It assesses the size, composition and volatility of non-tax revenue in the European Union, and it explores, by means of panel data analysis, whether macroeconomic and fiscal conditions can explain the observed heterogeneity in non-tax revenue across the Member States. We also find that the relative variability of non-tax revenue is around three times higher than that of tax revenue, being a significant source of fiscal risk that is often overlooked.

Keywords

Fiscal policy risk Government revenue European Union 

JEL Classification

E62 H27 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Ron Davies, and two anonymous referees, for helpful comments that improved the paper. We also thank Lucio Pench and Ingrid Toming for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the paper. The views expressed herein are the views of the authors only and may not, under any circumstances, be interpreted as stating an official position of the European Commission or the Université libre de Bruxelles.

References

  1. Bird, R. M. (2001). User charges in local government finance. In M. E. Freire & R. Stren (Eds.), The challenge of urban government. Washington, DC: The World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  2. European Commission. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation and fiscal discipline. Quarterly Report on the Euro Area No. 4/2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/qr_euro_area/2012/pdf/qrea4_en.pdf.
  3. European Commission. (2016). Assessment of the 2016 stability programme for Finland. Section 3.1 (Deficit Developments in 2015), p. 5, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/26_fi_scp_en_4.pdf.
  4. Eurostat. (2013). European System of Accounts—ESA 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  5. Eurostat. (2014). Manual of government deficit and debt—Implementation of ESA 2010 (MGDD-ESA 2010). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  6. Hickey, R., & Smyth, D. (2015). Government revenues in Ireland since the financial crisis. Central Bank of Ireland Economic Letter Series (Vol. 2015, No. 7).Google Scholar
  7. Morrison, K. M. (2009). Oil, nontax revenue and the redistributional foundations of regime stability. International Organisation, 63(1), 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mourre G., Astarita, C., & Maftei, A. (2016). Measuring the uncertainty in predicting public revenue. European Economy Discussion Paper, No. 039.Google Scholar
  9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1998). User charging for government services: Best practice guidelines and case studies. Public Management Occasional Papers No. 22.Google Scholar
  10. Tax Foundation Inc. (1968). Nontax Revenue. Research Publication No. 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Emile BerheimUniversité libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN)European CommissionBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations