International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 785–797 | Cite as

Restricted interest deductibility and multinationals’ use of internal debt finance

Article

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the role of interest deductibility for internal debt financing of multinational corporations (MNCs). We provide quasi-experimental evidence using restrictions on interest deductibility through thin-capitalization rules. Explicitly distinguishing between firms subject to a binding restriction and unrestricted firms, a panel data sample selection model is used to explore the tax sensitivity of the capital structure of foreign subsidiaries of MNCs. Our results confirm that the tax incentive for using internal loans is effectively removed for restricted subsidiaries. While internal debt financing of unrestricted subsidiaries positively responds to taxes, the effects are relatively small.

Keywords

Corporate taxation Multinational firms Internal debt  Thin-capitalization rules Sample selection 

JEL Classification

H25 G32 F23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data access by the Deutsche Bundesbank and financial support by the German Science Foundation (DFG) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Arena, M. P., & Roper, A. H. (2010). The effect of taxes on multinational debt location. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blouin, J., Huizinga, H., Laeven, L., & Nicodème, G. (2014). Thin capitalization rules and multinational firm capital structure. In IMF working paper 14/12.Google Scholar
  3. Buettner, T., Overesch, M., Schreiber, U., & Wamser, G. (2009). Taxation and capital structure choice—Evidence from a panel of German multinationals. Economics Letters, 105, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buettner, T., Overesch, M., Schreiber, U., & Wamser, G. (2012). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 930–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdry, B., & Chowal, J. D. (1998). Internal financing of multinational subsidiaries: Debt vs. equity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. (2004). A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 59, 2451–2487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feld, L. P., Heckemeyer, J. H., & Overesch, M. (2013). Capital structure choice and company taxation—A meta study. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2850–2866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gopalan, R., Nanda, R., & Seru, A. (2007). Affiliated firms and financial support—Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 86, 759–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huizinga, H., Laeven, L., & Nicodème, G. (2008). Capital structure and international debt shifting. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 80–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kyriazidou, E. (1997). Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica, 65, 1335–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lipponer, A. (2006). Microdatabase direct investment—MiDi. A brief guide. In Bundesbank working paper, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  13. MacKie-Mason, J. (1990). Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions? Journal of Finance, 45, 1471–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mintz, J., & Smart, M. (2004). Income shifting, investment, and tax competition: Theory and evidence from provincial taxation in Canada. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Overesch, M., & Wamser, G. (2010). Corporate tax planning and thin-capitalization rules: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Applied Economics, 42, 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schindler, D., & Schjelderup, G. (2012). Debt shifting and ownership structure. European Economic Review, 56, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wamser, G. (2014). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on external debt usage—A propensity score matching approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(5), 764–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weichenrieder, A. J., & Windischbauer, H. (2008). Thin-capitalization rules and company responses—Experience from German legislation. In CESifo Working Paper 2456, Munich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thiess Buettner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Overesch
    • 3
  • Georg Wamser
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.FAUErlangen-NurembergGermany
  2. 2.CESifoMunichGermany
  3. 3.University of CologneCologneGermany
  4. 4.University of TuebingenTüebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations