International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 422–435

Corporation tax asymmetries: effective tax rates and profit shifting

Article
  • 388 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the way in which the asymmetric treatment of losses within corporate tax codes can be expected to affect behavioural responses to changes in tax rates. The paper uses the concept of an equivalent tax function, raising the same present value of tax payments as the actual function, in which the effective rate on losses in any period, and thus the degree of asymmetry, is explicit. The influence on the elasticity of tax revenue with respect to the tax rate of this effective rate is then examined, where ‘loss-shifting’ occurs. Results suggest that estimates of the behavioural effect on tax revenues of changes in tax rates can be expected in general to be smaller in regimes which involve greater asymmetries in the tax treatment of losses. Importantly, as losses vary over the economic cycle, the model predicts that the asymmetric tax treatment generates effects on tax revenues that are non-linear between above-trend and below-trend parts of the cycle.

Keywords

Corporation tax Tax asymmetries Income shifting Effective tax rate 

JEL Classification

H25 H32 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuler, R., & Auerbach, A. J. (1990). The significance of tax law asymmetries: an empirical investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 61–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach, A. J. (1986). The dynamic effects of tax law asymmetries. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 205–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auerbach, A. J. (2007). Why have corporation tax revenues declined? Another look. CESifo Economic Studies (p. 1–19). Google Scholar
  4. Bartelsman, E. J., & Beetsma, R. M. W. J. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2225–2252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, M., & Knittel, M. (2006). Partial loss refundability: how are corporate tax losses used? National Tax Journal, 59, 651–663. Google Scholar
  6. Creedy, J., & Gemmell, N. (2007). Modelling responses to profit taxation: the case of the UK corporation tax. University of Melbourne. Google Scholar
  7. Creedy, J., & Gemmell, N. (2008). Corporation tax buoyancy and revenue elasticity in the UK. Economic Modelling, 25, 24–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2001). The taxation of domestic and foreign banking. Journal of Public Economics, 79, 429–453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devereux, M. P. (1989). Tax asymmetries, the cost of capital and investment: some evidence from United Kingdom panel data. Economic Journal, 99, 103–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donnelly, M., & Young, A. (2002). Policy options for tax loss treatment: how does Canada compare? Canadian Tax Journal, 50, 429–488. Google Scholar
  11. Edgerton, J. (2007) Investment incentives and corporate tax asymmetries. Unpublished manuscript, MIT. Google Scholar
  12. Feldstein, M. (1995). The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income. A panel study of the 1986 tax reform act. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 551–572. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldstein, M. (1999). Tax avoidance and the deadwight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 674–680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham, J. R. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt? The Journal of Finance, 55, 1901–1941. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huizinga, H., & Laeven, L. (2007). International profit shifting within European Multinationals. CEPR Dicussion Paper, No. 6048. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.New Zealand TreasuryWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations