Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 571–604 | Cite as

Neutral taxation of shareholder income? Corporate responses to an announced dividend tax

  • Annette AlstadsæterEmail author
  • Erik Fjærli
Article

Abstract

The introduction of the 2006 Norwegian shareholder income tax was announced in advance, and it increased top marginal tax rates on individual dividend income from zero to 28%. We document strong timing effects on dividend payout on a large panel of non-listed corporations, with a surge of dividends prior to 2006 and a sharp drop after. Mature firms are more likely to pay dividends, and high asset growth increases the probability of retaining all earnings. Intertemporal income shifting through the timing of dividends seems to be a drain on internal equity and cause increases in the corporations’ debt–equity ratios. The debt ratios drop sharply after the implementation of the reform.

Keywords

Neutral dividend tax Dual income tax Intertemporal income shifting Anticipation effects Corporate financial policy Transition 

JEL Classification

G32 G35 H24 H25 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarbu, K. O., & Thoresen, T. O. (2001). Income responses to tax changes—evidence from the Norwegian tax reform. National Tax Journal, 54(2), 319–338. Google Scholar
  2. Allen, F., & Michaely, R. (2003). Payout policy. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.). Handbook of the economics of finance. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  3. Alstadsæter, A. (2007). The Achilles heel of the dual income tax. The Norwegian case. Finnish Economic Papers, 20, 5–22. Google Scholar
  4. Alstadsæter, A., & Wangen, K. R. (2008). Corporations’ choice of tax regime when transition costs are small and income shifting potential is large (CESifo Working Paper No. 2392). Google Scholar
  5. Alstadsæter, A., Fjærli, E., & Thoresen, T. O. (2006). Om bakgrunnen for og utformingen av skattereformen i 2006. Beta. Scandinavian Journal of Business Research, 64–80. Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez, L. H. R., Kanniainen, V., & Södersten, J. (1998). Tax policy uncertainty and corporate investments. A theory of tax-induced investments spurts. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 17–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersson, K., Kanniainen, V., Södersten, J., & Sørensen, P. B. (1998). Corporate tax policy in the Nordic Countries. In P. B. Sørensen (Ed.). Tax policy in the Nordic Countries (pp. 72–137). London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  8. Auerbach, A. (1979). Wealth maximization and the cost of capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 433–446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Auerbach, A. (2003). Taxation and corporate financial policy. In A. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  10. Auerbach, A., & Hasset, K. (2002). On the marginal source of investment funds. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 205–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Auerbach, A., & Hasset, K. (2006). Dividend taxes and firm valuation. New evidence. American Economic Review, 96(2), 119–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Auerbach, A., & Hasset, K. (2007). The 2003 dividend tax cuts and the value of the firm. An event study. In A. Auerbach, J. R. Hines, & J. Slemrod (Eds.), Taxing corporate income in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  13. Baker, H. K., Mukherjee, T. K., & Paskelian, O. G. (2006). How Norwegian managers view dividend policy. Global Finance Journal, 17, 155–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004). A catering theory of dividends. Journal of Finance, 59, 1125–1165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernheim, B. D., & Wantz, A. (1995). A tax-based test of the dividend signalling hypothesis. American Economic Review, 85(3), 532–551. Google Scholar
  16. Boadway, R. (2004). The dual income tax system—an overview. CESifo DICE Report, 2(3), 3–8. Google Scholar
  17. Bond, S. R., Devereux, M. P., & Klemm, A. (2007). Dissecting dividend decisions. Some clues about the effects of dividend taxation from recent UK tax reforms. In A. Auerbach, J. R. Hines, & J. Slemrod (Eds.), Taxing corporate income in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  18. Bradford, D. (1981). The incidence and allocation effects of a tax on corporate distributions. Journal of Public Economics, 15, 1–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chetty, R., & Saez, E. (2005). Dividend taxes and corporate behavior. Evidence from the 2003 dividend tax cut. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 791–833. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chetty, R., & Saez, E. (2007). An agency theory of dividend taxation (NBER Working Paper No. 13538). Google Scholar
  21. DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Skinner, D. J. (2004). Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings. Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 425–456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Denis, D. J., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 62–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Desai, M. A., & Goolsbee, A. D. (2004). Investment, overhang and tax policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 285–355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends. Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 3–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fjærli, E. (2004). Tax reform and the demand for debt. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 435–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fjærli, E., & Lund, D. (2001). The choice between owner’s wages and dividends under the dual income tax. Finnish Economic Papers, 14, 104–119. Google Scholar
  27. Gordon, R. H., & Dietz, M. (2009). Dividends and taxes. In A. Auerbach & D. Shaviro (Eds.), Institutional foundations of public finance. Economic and legal perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  28. Gordon, R., & Slemrod, J. (2000). Are “real” responses to taxes simply income shifting between corporate and personal tax base? In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich (pp. 240–288). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Russel Sage Foundation, Chap. 8. Google Scholar
  29. Hagen, K. P., & Sørensen, P. B. (1998). Taxation of income from small businesses. Taxation principles and tax reforms in the Nordic Countries. In P. B. Sørensen (Ed.). Tax policy in the Nordic Countries (pp. 28–71). London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  30. Hansson, Å. (2004). Taxpayers responsiveness to tax rate changes and implications for the cost of taxation (Department of Economics Working Paper No. 5). Lund University. Google Scholar
  31. Harberger, A. (1962). The incidence of the corporation tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harberger, A. (1966). Efficiency effects of taxes on income from capital. In M. Krzyzakniak (Ed.), Effects of corporation income tax. Detroit: Detroit Waine State University Press. Google Scholar
  33. Hines, J. R. (1996). Dividends and profits. Some unsubtle foreign influences. Journal of Finance, 51, 661–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobsen, M. R. (2008). In Yearbook for Nordic tax research 2008. Norwegian Economic National Report—Taxation of capital and wage income; towards separated or more integrated personal systems. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing. Google Scholar
  35. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 59–83. Google Scholar
  36. Kari, S. (1999). Dynamic behaviour of the firm under dual income taxation (VATT Research Reports 51). Government Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki. Google Scholar
  37. Kari, S., Karikallio, H., & Pirttilä, J. (2008). Anticipating tax changes. Evidence from the Finnish corporate income tax reform of 2005. Fiscal Studies, 29(2), 167–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King, M. (1974). Taxation and the cost of capital. Review of Economic Studies, 41(1), 21–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). Dividend taxation and intertemporal tax arbitrage (NBER Working Paper No. 13858). Google Scholar
  40. Lindhe, T., Södersten, J., & Öberg, A. (2004). Economic effects of taxing different organizational forms under the Nordic dual income tax. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 477–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review, 46, 97–113. Google Scholar
  42. MacKie-Mason, J. K. (1990). Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions? The Journal of Finance, 45(5), 1471–1493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411–433. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Modigliani, F., & Miller, H. M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297. Google Scholar
  45. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 187–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nielsen, S. B., & Sørensen, P. B. (1997). On the optimality of the Nordic system of dual income taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 63, 311–329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pirttilä, J., & Selin, H. (2006). How successful is the dual income tax? Evidence from the Finnish tax reform of 1993 (Department of Economics Working Paper No. 26). November 2006, University of Uppsala. Google Scholar
  48. Poterba, J. (2004). Taxation and corporate payout policy. American Economic Review, 94(2), 171–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poterba, J., & Summers, L. (1985). The economic effects of dividend taxation. In E. Altman & M. Subrahmanyam (Eds.), Recent advances in corporate finance (pp. 227–284). Homewood: Irwin Publishers. Google Scholar
  50. Selén, J. (2002). Taxable income responses to tax changes—a panel analysis of the 1990/91 Swedish reform (Trade Union Institute for Economic Research, Working Paper No. 177). Google Scholar
  51. Sinn, H. W. (1991). The vanishing Harberger triangle. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 271–300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Slemrod, J. B. (1995). Income creation or income shifting? Behavioral responses to the tax reform act of 1986. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 85, 175–180. Google Scholar
  53. Sørensen, P. B. (1994). From the global income tax to the dual income tax. Recent tax reforms in the Nordic countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 1, 57–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sørensen, P. B. (Ed.). (1998). Tax policy in the Nordic Countries. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  55. Sørensen, P. B. (2005a). Neutral taxation of shareholder income. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 777–801. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sørensen, P. B. (2005b). Dual income taxation. why and how? FinanzArchiv, 61, 559–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thoresen, T. O. (2004). Reduced tax progressivity in Norway in the nineties. The effect from tax changes. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 487–506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thoresen, T. O., & Alstadsæter, A. (2008). Shifts in organizational form under a dual income tax system (CESifo Working Paper No. 2273). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Health Management and Health EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Statistics NorwayOsloNorway
  3. 3.CESifoMunichGermany
  4. 4.Research DepartmentStatistics NorwayOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations