Optimal unemployment insurance design: Time limits, monitoring, or workfare?
This paper analyses crucial design features of unemployment insurance (UI) policies. We examine three different means of improving the efficiency of UI: the duration of benefit payments, monitoring in conjunction with sanctions, and workfare. To that end we develop a quantitative model of equilibrium unemployment. The model features worker heterogeneity in preferences for leisure. The analysis suggests that a system with monitoring and sanctions restores search incentives most effectively, since it brings additional incentives to search actively so as to avoid the sanction. Therefore, the UI provider can offer a more generous UI replacement rate in a system with monitoring and sanctions than in the other two systems. Workfare appears to be inferior to the other two systems.
KeywordsUnemployment insurance Search Monitoring Sanctions Workfare
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abbring, J., van den Berg, G., & van der Ours, J. (1998). The Effect of Unemployment Insurance Sanctions on the Transition Rate from Unemployment to Employment. Working paper, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Beaudry, P., & Blackorby, C. (1998). Taxes and Employment Subsidies in Optimal Redistribution Programs, NBER Working Paper 6355.Google Scholar
- Benus, J., & Johnson, T. (1997). Evaluation of the Maryland Unemployment Insurance Work Search Demonstration. Report prepared for Maryland Department of Labor, Battelle Memorial Institute in conjunction with Abt Associates Inc. Available on the web at the address: http://wdr.doleta.gov/owsdrr/98-2/
- Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1992). Workfare versus welfare: Incentive Arguments for Work Requirements in Poverty-Alleviation Programs. American Economic Review, 82, 249–261.Google Scholar
- Boone, J., & van Ours, J. (2000). Modeling Financial Incentives to Get Unemployed Back to Work. CentER Discussion Paper 2000-02, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
- Boone, J., Fredriksson, P., Holmlund, B., & van Ours, J. (2002). Optimal Unemployment Insurance with Monitoring and Sanctions. Working paper 2002:21, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).Google Scholar
- Fredriksson, P., & Holmlund, B. (2003). Improving Incentives in Unemployment Insurance: A Review of Recent Research. Working paper 2003:10, Department of Economics, Uppsala University. Forthcoming in Journal of Economic Surveys.Google Scholar
- Hassler, J., & Rodriguez Mora, J. V. (2002). Should UI Benefits Really Fall over Time? CESifo Working Paper No 804.Google Scholar
- Jackman, R. (1994). What Can Active Labour Market Policy Do? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 1, 221–257.Google Scholar
- Lalive, R., van Ours, J. C., & Zweimüller, J. (2002). The Effect of Benefit Sanction on the Duration of Unemployment. Discussion paper 3311, Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Lundin, M. (2000). Tillämpningen av arbetslöshetsförsäkringens regelverk vid arbetsförmedlingarna, stencil 2000:1, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).Google Scholar
- Van den Berg, G., & van der Klaauw, B. (2001). Counseling and Monitoring of Unemployed Workers: Theory and Evidence from a Social Experiment. Working Paper 2001:12, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).Google Scholar