Advertisement

Design of an O2O Citizen Participation Ecosystem for Sustainable Governance

  • 224 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Citizen participation is essential to create the public value required for sustainable governance. Offline citizen participation enables government policies through physical actions, but is not automatically quantified. Online citizen participation, especially the opinion expression, usually be facilitated by suitable incentives using a recorded participation process, but this makes only limited contribution to governance. The isolation of the processes of two participations limits their mutual promotion. Therefore, using a design science paradigm, we designed an O2O (Offline-to-Online or Online-to-Offline) citizen participation ecosystem for sustainable governance based on social exchange theory. The ecosystem includes three categories of key stakeholders: citizens, government organizations, and the O2O platform manager. Five components are specified: motivations, contextualized governance policies and strategies, offline/online citizen-to-government contributions, online/offline government-to-citizen rewards, and retention and recommendation. The ecosystem was evaluated and then improved using a case study on O2O green commuting governance in China. This study provides a reproducible framework to combine offline and online citizen participation to enhance collaborative social governance in the digital age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337–346.

  2. Althoff, T., Jindal, P., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Online actions with offline impact: How online social networks influence online and offline user behavior. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (WSDM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018661.3018672, 2017.

  3. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544–555.

  4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

  5. Bertot, J., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 211–222.

  6. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Haugstveit, I. M., Lüders, M., & Følstad, A. (2016). How should organizations adapt to youth civic engagement in social media? A lead user approach. Interacting with Computers, 28(5), 664–679.

  7. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.

  8. Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36, 263–290.

  9. Conroy, M., Feezell, J. T., & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1535–1546.

  10. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

  11. Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27.

  12. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal Filho, W. (2015). Sustainable universities–a study of critical success factors for participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 11–21.

  13. Dzur, A. W. (2003). Civic implications of restorative justice theory: Citizen participation and criminal justice policy. Policy Sciences, 36(3–4), 279–306.

  14. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.

  15. Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: A systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 676–713.

  16. Heimstädt, M., Saunderson, F., & Heath, T. (2014). Conceptualizing open data ecosystems: a timeline analysis of open data development in the UK. In Proceedings of the international Confernce for E-democracy and open government (CeDEM2014).245-255. sn. Krems, Austria. Retrieved from http://edocs.fuberlin.de/docs/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDOCS_derivate_000000003562/discpaper2014_12-2.pdf.

  17. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

  18. Hong, L., Fu, C., Wu, J., & Frias-Martinez, V. (2018). Information needs and communication gaps between citizens and local governments online during natural disasters. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–13.

  19. Indulska, M., & Recker, J. (2010). 13. Design science in IS research: A literature analysis. Information systems foundations: The role of design science, 285–302.

  20. Jänicke, M. (2012). Dynamic governance of clean-energy markets: How technical innovation could accelerate climate policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 50–59.

  21. Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236.

  22. Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2018). Citizen-centered big data analysis-driven governance intelligence framework for smart cities. Telecommunications Policy, 42(10), 881–896.

  23. Kim, Y., & Darnall, N. (2016). Business as a collaborative partner: Understanding firms’ sociopolitical support for policy formation. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 326–337.

  24. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828.

  25. Kim, H. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Examining gifting through social network services: A social exchange theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0737.

  26. Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.

  27. Leal Filho, W., Platje, J., Gerstlberger, W., Ciegis, R., Kääriä, J., Klavins, M., & Kliucininkas, L. (2016). The role of governance in realising the transition towards sustainable societies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 755–766.

  28. Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance–precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36–43.

  29. Mergel, I., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Isett, K. (2016). Big data in urban affairs. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 928–937.

  30. Ogie, R. I., Forehead, H., Clarke, R. J., & Perez, P. (2018). Participation patterns and reliability of human sensing in crowd-sourced disaster management. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(4), 713–728.

  31. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.

  32. Pendry, L. F., & Salvatore, J. (2015). Individual and social benefits of online discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 211–220.

  33. Phang, C. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 128–132.

  34. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Huang, L. (2014). Drivers of quantity and quality of participation in online policy deliberation forums. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 172–212.

  35. Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2017). Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 26–36.

  36. Pita, C., Chuenpagdee, R., & Pierce, G. J. (2012). Participatory issues in fisheries governance in Europe. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(4), 347–361.

  37. Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 23–37.

  38. Rosenberger, M., Lehrer, C., & Jung, R. (2017). Integrating data from user activities of social networks into public administrations. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 253–266.

  39. Schweitzer, F. M., Buchinger, W., Gassmann, O., & Obrist, M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management, 55(3), 32–38.

  40. Skågeby, J. (2010). Gift-giving as a conceptual framework: Framing social behavior in online networks. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 170–177.

  41. Toker-Yildiz, K., Trivedi, M., Choi, J., & Chang, S. R. (2017). Social interactions and monetary incentives in driving consumer repeat behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 364–380.

  42. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1121.

  43. Tukker, A., Emmert, S., Charter, M., Vezzoli, C., Sto, E., Andersen, M. M., et al. (2008). Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence-based view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), 1218–1225.

  44. Van Ham, H., & Koppenjan, J. (2001). Building public-private partnerships: Assessing and managing risks in port development. Public Management Review, 3(4), 593–616.

  45. Vicente, M. R., & Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens' online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387.

  46. Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

  47. Wang, X., & Van Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278.

  48. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2004). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.

  49. Wise, S., Paton, R. A., & Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector: A review of US and European initiatives. Vine, 42(2), 251–276.

  50. Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643–653.

  51. Yetano, A., & Royo, S. (2017). Keeping citizens engaged: A comparison between online and offline participants. Administration & Society, 49(3), 394–422.

  52. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity, 19(1), 17–33.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91646105, 71781220619, 71429001, 71472053]; the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M550198, 2015T80363]; and the China Scholarship Council [201706120223, 201706125025].

Author information

Correspondence to Luning Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, J., Liu, L. & Feng, Y. Design of an O2O Citizen Participation Ecosystem for Sustainable Governance. Inf Syst Front 21, 605–620 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09910-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citizen participation
  • O2O
  • Sustainable governance
  • Social exchange
  • Design science