Digital Occupational Health Systems: What Do Employees Think about it?
- 202 Downloads
A high rate of work-related accidents or diseases around the world not only threatens the health and wellbeing of employees, but also causes a considerable annual economic burden for organizations. One promising use of information technology would therefore be the management and prevention of occupational accidents and employee absenteeism. Although some companies are starting to introduce digital occupational health initiatives, there is scarce evidence about the inhibiting factors which may discourage the wide adoption of such systems in the workforce. This paper presents qualitative and quantitative data of an exploratory study, which delves into the perceptions of employees towards the use of digital occupational health systems. Our results show that employees are usually aware of the enhanced possibilities for managing and improving their health and wellbeing through such corporate initiatives. However, privacy concerns and the additional mental pressure caused by such systems, significantly diminishes an employee’s willingness to adopt them.
KeywordsDigital occupational health Mixed methods Sensor-based systems Technology adoption
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Al-Natour, S., & Benbasat, I. (2009). The adoption and use of IT artifacts: a new interaction-centric model for the study of user-artifact relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(9), 661–685.Google Scholar
- Balci, B., Rosenkranz, C., & Schuhen, S. (2014). Identification of different affordances of information technology systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, 9-11 June 2014, pp. 1-15.Google Scholar
- Bouchard, T. J. (1976). Field research methods: interviewing, questionnaires, participant observation, unobtrusive measures. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 363–414). Chicago: Rand-McNally College Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, D., McLeod, A., Hicks, C., & Maasberg, M. (2016). Privacy and biometrics: an empirical examination of employee concerns. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9667-5.
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Corbellini, S., Ferraris, F., & Parvis, M. (2008). A system for monitoring workers’ safety in an unhealthy environment by means of wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Victoria, 12-15 May 2008, pp. 951-955. Google Scholar
- Culnan, M. J., & Williams, C. C. (2009). How ethics can enhance organizational privacy: Lessons from the choicepoint and TJX data breaches. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 673–687.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Faraj, S., and Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In: Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., Kallinikos, J. (Eds.) Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
- Fingas, R. (2015). IBM adopts Apple watch for internal fitness initiative & Watson-linked health app. http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/10/27/ibm-adopts-apple-watch-for-internal-fitness-initiative-watson-linked-health-app2016. Accessed 7 Sept 2016.
- Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph - tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(5), 91–109.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (Ed.). (1979). The theory of affordances, the ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Grgecic, D., Holten, R., & Rosenkranz, C. (2015). The impact of functional affordances and symbolic expressions on the formation of beliefs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(7), 580–607.Google Scholar
- Hu, H., Xu, J., and Lee, D. L. (2010). PAM: An efficient and privacy-aware monitoring framework for continuously moving objects, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(3), 404–419.Google Scholar
- Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–168.Google Scholar
- Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749–775.Google Scholar
- Maier, J. R. A., Fadel, G.M., & Battisto, D. G. (2009). An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30(4), 393–414.Google Scholar
- Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. (2012). Technology affordances and constraints in management information systems (MIS). In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at Desanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 609–632.Google Scholar
- McFarlane, D. C., and Latorella, K. A. (2002). The scope and importance of human interruption in humancomputer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 1–61.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Olson, P. (2014). Wearable tech is plugging into health insurance. http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/06/19/wearable-tech-health-insurance/2016. Accessed 7 Sept 2016.
- Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L., & Rodgers, M. (2012). A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 9(1), 21.Google Scholar
- Piccoli, G., & Pigni, F. (2013). Harvesting external data: the potential of digital data streams. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
- Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014) Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. In Proceedings of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, 7-9 August 2014, pp. 1-12.Google Scholar
- Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iii–xiv.Google Scholar
- Schwaibold, M., Gmelin, M., von Wagner, G., Schochlin, J., & Bolz, A. (2002). Key factors for personal health monitoring and diagnosis devices. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Mobile Computing in Medicine, Heidelberg, 11 April 2002, pp. 143-150.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thompson, G. (1966). The evaluation of public opinion. In B. Berelson & M. Janowitz (Eds.), Reader in public opinion and communication (pp. 7–12). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), pp. 695-704.Google Scholar
- van der Veer, G. C., & van Welie, M. (2003). Dutch-designing for users and tasks from concepts to handles. In D. Diaper & A. S. Neville (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 155–173). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Vitari, C., & Pigni, F. (2014). DDGS affordances for value creation. In L. Caporarello, B. Di Martino, & M. Martinez (Eds.), Smart organizations and smart artifacts (pp. 9–16). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vyas, D., Fitz-Walter, Z., Mealy, E., Soro, A., Zhang, J., & Brereton, M. (2015). Exploring physical activities in an employer-sponsored health program. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, 18–23 April 2015, pp. 1421–1426.Google Scholar
- Wang, N., Carte, T., & Schwarzkopf, A. (2015). How should technology affordances be measured? An initial comparison of two approaches. In Proceedings of the 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems, Fajardo, Puerto Rico, 13–15 August 2015, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. R., & Sharples, S. (2015). Evaluation of human work, (4ed.). London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (1995). Global strategy on occupational health for all: the way to health at work, recommendation of the second meeting of the who collaborating centres in occupational health. http://www.who.int/occupational_health/globstrategy/en/. Accessed 7 Sept 2016.
- Wu, P. F. (2012). A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(3), 172–187.Google Scholar
- Zijlstra, F. R., Roe, R. A., Leonora, A. B., and Krediet, I. (1999). Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 163–185.Google Scholar