Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 233–235 | Cite as

Big data and analytics in healthcare: Introduction to the special section

  • Atreyi KankanhalliEmail author
  • Jungpil Hahn
  • Sharon Tan
  • Gordon Gao
Article

Aging populations and lifestyle changes pose increasing pressures on healthcare systems around the world. These trends accompanied by the digitization of health and patient data through advances in information technology, including medical sensors, have led to the generation of large volumes of primary and secondary data in the healthcare domain. The demand for big data is also spurred by a shift to evidence-based medicine as opposed to subjective clinical decisions. While the trove of data offers significant opportunities for improving healthcare delivery, management, and policy making, new information systems and approaches are needed to make effective use of the big data. Indeed, big data has been referred to as data that is too large and complex to be analyzed and managed by traditional computing tools.

The complexity of analyzing big data arises from its three dimensions, i.e., variety, velocity, and volume (Gartner 2011). ‘Variety’ implies that big data is made up of many different kinds of data, both structured and unstructured, e.g., physician’s notes. Healthcare data appears in a variety of formats and representations from diverse sources that include: (1) clinical data in Electronic Health Records, medical images, machine created/sensor data, and genomics, (2) pharmaceutical and R&D data e.g., from clinical trials and journal articles, (3) activity claims and cost data from healthcare providers and insurance companies, and (4) patient behaviour and sentiment data from wearable devices and social media posts, including Twitter feeds, blogs, status updates on Facebook, healthcare communities, and web pages (Raghupathi and Raghupathi 2014). ‘Velocity’ refers to big data being transmitted and available in real-time, e.g., vital signs, and often arriving in bursts rather than at a constant rate. ‘Volume’ implies that big data, as per the term itself, is extremely large in size. For instance, a 3D CAT scan typically takes up 1 GB while a single human genome accounts for about 3 GB of data.

Healthcare analytics refers to the systematic use of health data and related business insights developed through applying analytical, e.g. statistical, contextual, quantitative, predictive, cognitive, and other models, to drive fact-based decision making for planning, management, measurement, and learning in healthcare (Cortada et al. 2012). Big data analytics has the ability to go beyond improving profits and cutting down on waste, to be able to predict epidemics, cure diseases, improve the quality of life and reduce preventable deaths (Marr 2015). Among these applications, predictive analytics is believed to be the next revolution both in statistics and medicine around the world (Winters-Miner 2014). Predictive analytics involves using empirical methods (statistical and other) to generate data predictions as well as methods for assessing predictive power (Shmueli and Koppius 2011). It uses a variety of statistical techniques such as modeling, machine learning, and data mining that analyze current and historical data to make predictions about the future. For instance, predictive analytics could be used to identify high-risk patients and provide them treatment to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations or readmissions.

As noted above, big healthcare data analytics presents great potential for transforming healthcare, yet there are manifold challenges ahead. These challenges include not only technological hurdles but also organizational, social, economic, and policy barriers that accompany the application of analytics to big healthcare data. On the technological front, challenges include integrating and/or analyzing various forms of healthcare data to address impending problems. In terms of organizational barriers, prior studies have reported how organizations (Yang et al. 2015) and healthcare professionals (Yang et al. 2012) may resist the introduction of technologies that facilitate data capture for analytics but change their work processes. Additionally, social issues, such as privacy concerns, surround the use of new technologies such as wearables that enable personal data analytics. Economics scholars, on the other hand, are concerned about how these technologies and analytics outcomes may impact healthcare costs for various stakeholders. Finally, technologies that allow healthcare data capture and analytics entail policy implications such as changes in privacy and data protection laws. These myriad challenges around the use of technology for big healthcare data analytics present a fertile ground for IS researchers of technical, behavioral/organizational, and economics streams.

Motivated thus, the Centre for Health Informatics at the National University of Singapore organized the 1st and 2nd “International Conference on Big Data and Analytics in Healthcare” (BDAH) in 20131 and 20142 to provide a forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to share cutting-edge research and practice on this important phenomenon. In the 2nd BDAH conference, both academic/research and practice focus paper submissions were invited. This special section includes original research contributions both from participants of the 2nd BDAH as well as from the wider research community. This section comprises two articles that address specific technical and behavioral challenges, respectively, of healthcare data analytics.

The first paper by Timsina et al. (2016) provides an advanced analytics solution for automation of medical systematic reviews. While systematic reviews are an essential element of modern evidence-based medical practice, the creation and update of these reviews is resource intensive. The authors leveraged advanced analytics techniques for automatically classifying articles for inclusion and exclusion for systematic reviews. Specifically, they used soft-margin polynomial Support Vector Machine (SVM) as a classifier, exploited Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) for medical terms extraction, and examined various techniques to resolve the class imbalance issue. Through an empirical study, they demonstrated that the proposed soft-margin polynomial SVM achieves better classification performance than the existing algorithms used in current research, and the performance of the classifier was further improved by using UMLS to identify medical terms in articles and by applying re-sampling methods to resolve the class imbalance issue.

The second paper by Yang and Lee (2016) investigates the antecedents of healthcare information protection intention (HIPI) of healthcare information systems (HIS) users, which is a prerequisite for healthcare information analytics. They proposed and tested a model to explain HIPI, which incorporates constructs from general deterrence theory and protection motivation theory. Their results show that: (1) a clear awareness of the consequences of security threats increases HIS users’ understanding on the severity of healthcare information leakage, and thus may decrease abuse of HIS by users, (2) user satisfaction with the security system enhances their self-efficacy that they can handle the medical information leakage issue by themselves, and (3) although HIS users are starting to realize the consequences of healthcare information leakage, they think that they are unlikely to encounter such situations. The findings imply that ongoing security education is needed to increase HIPI of HIS users, and it is important to motivate users to protect healthcare information through their satisfaction with the security system.

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to a few people who made this special section possible and successful. First, many thanks to H.R. Rao and R. Ramesh for their support for the publication of this special section on “Big Data and Analytics in Healthcare”. Second, we thank Jayson Cordero and Jennielyn Flores who helped to coordinate the entire paper submissions, reviews, and publication process. Finally, we would like to offer our most heartfelt appreciation to all the reviewers for their hard work and time.

Footnotes

References

  1. Cortada, J. W., Gordon, D., & Lenihan, B. (2012). The value of analytics in healthcare: from insights to outcomes. IBM Global Business Services, Life Sciences and Healthcare, Executive Report.Google Scholar
  2. Gartner. (2011). Gartner says solving ‘Big Data’ challenge involves more than just managing volumes of data. STAMFORD, Con. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1731916. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  3. Marr, B. (2015). How big data is changing healthcare. http://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2015/04/21/how-big-data-is-changing-healthcare/print/. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  4. Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Information Science and Systems, 2, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572.Google Scholar
  6. Timsina, P., Liu, J., & El-Gayar, O. (2016). Advanced analytics for the automation of medical systematic reviews. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 2. doi: 10.1007/s10796-015-9589-7.Google Scholar
  7. Winters-Miner, L. A. (2014). Seven ways predictive analytics can improve healthcare. Elsevier Connect. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/seven-ways-predictive-analytics-can-improve-healthcare. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  8. Yang, C., & Lee, H. (2016). A study on the antecedents of healthcare information protection intention. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 2. doi: 10.1007/s10796-015-9594-x.Google Scholar
  9. Yang, Z., Ng, B. Y., & Kankanhalli, A. (2012). Workarounds in the use of IS in healthcare: a case study of an electronic medication administration system. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 70(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang, Z., Kankanhalli, A., Ng, B. Y., & Lim, J. T.-Y. (2015). Examining the pre-adoption stages of healthcare IT: a case study of vital signs monitoring systems. Information Management, 52(4), 454–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atreyi Kankanhalli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jungpil Hahn
    • 1
  • Sharon Tan
    • 1
  • Gordon Gao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Decision, Operations and Information Technologies DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations