Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1177–1190 | Cite as

Understanding health information technology adoption: A synthesis of literature from an activity perspective

Article

Abstract

The vast body of literature on health information technology (HIT) adoption features considerably heterogeneous factors and demands for a synthesis of the knowledge in the field. This study employs text mining and network analysis techniques to identify the important concepts and their relationships in the abstracts of 979 articles of HIT adoption. Through the lens of Activity Theory, the revealed concept map of HIT adoption can be viewed as a complex activity system involving different users, technologies and tasks at both the individual level and the social level. Such a synthesis not only discloses the current knowledge domain of HIT adoption, but also provides guidance for future research on HIT adoption.

Keywords

Activity theory Health information technology System adoption Text mining Network analysis Literature synthesis 

Notes

Appendix: Glossary of terms

Health information technology (HIT)

The umbrella term that refers to the application of information processing involving both computer hardware and software that deals with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision making (Brailer and Thompson 2004).

Picture archiving & communication systems (PACS)

A medical imaging technology which provides economical storage of and convenient access to, images from multiple sources (Choplin 1992).

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE)

An application that allows healthcare providers in hospitals and clinics to use computers to enter medical orders (e.g. medication, laboratory, admission, radiology, referral, and procedure orders) electronically for the treatment of their patients (Kuperman and Gibson 2003; Sittig and Steed 1994).

Electronic prescription (E-prescription)

An application that allows a physician, physician assistant, or nurse to transmit a new or renewal prescription to a pharmacy rather than filling out a paper prescription (Grossman et al. 2007).

Telemedicine

The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) to help remote areas (e.g. rural communities) eliminate distance barriers and improve access to medical services (Berman and Fenaughty 2005).

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS)

An interactive decision support system (DSS) designed to help physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners make decisions, such as determining diagnosis based on patient data (Berner 2007).

Electronic medical records (EMR)

Digital versions of paper charts that contain the medical and treatment history of the patients from one practice for providers to use for diagnosis and treatment (Miller 1993).

Electronic health records (EHR)

An evolving concept that generally refers to the systematic collection of digital records about individual patients or populations for the use and exchange of them across different health care settings (Gunter and Terry 2005).

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A. K. (2010). The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21, 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammenwerth E., Iller, C., & Mahler, C. (2006). IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6(3), available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6947-6-3.pdf.
  4. Anderson, J. G. (2007). Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(5), 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angst, C. M., Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Kelley, K. (2010). Social contagion and information technology diffusion: The adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals. Management Science, 56(12), 19–1241.Google Scholar
  6. Ash, J. S., Stavri, P. Z., & Kuperman, G. J. (2003). Consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(3), 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Oxford: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  8. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  9. Balka, E., Whitehouse, S., Coates, S. T., & Andrusiek, D. (2012). Ski hill injuries and ghost charts: Socio-technical issues in achieving e-health interoperability across jurisdictions. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(1), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social Psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Bates, D. W., Teich, J. M., Lee, J., Seger, D., Kuperman, G. J., Ma’Luf, N., et al. (1999). The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6(4), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berman, M., & Fenaughty, A. (2005). Technology and managed care: Patient benefits of telemedicine in a rural health care network. Health Economics, 14(6), 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berner, E. S. (2007). Clinical decision support systems: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhattacherjee, A., Hikmet, N., Menachemi, N., Kayhan, V., & Brooks, R. G. (2006). The differential performance effects of healthcare information technology adoption. Information Systems Management, 24(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). Ucinet 5.0 for windows. Natick: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  16. Brailer, D., & Thompson, T. (2004). Health IT strategic framework. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  17. Brooks, R. G., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., & Clawson, A. (2005). Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals. Journal of Medical Systems, 29(2), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cañas, A., Carff, R., Hill, G., Carvalho, M., Arguedas, M., Eskridge, T., et al. (2005). Concept maps: Integrating knowledge and information visualization. Knowledge and Information Visualization, 3426, 181–184.Google Scholar
  19. Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., Gómez, G., et al. (2004). Cmaptools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In In the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (Pamplona, Spain), 1 (pp. 125–133).Google Scholar
  20. Carstens, D. S., Patterson, P., Laird, R., & Preston, P. (2009). Task analysis of healthcare delivery system. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 6, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castillo, V. H., Martínez-García, A. I., & Pulido, J. R. G. (2010). A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: A systematic literature review. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 10(1), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang, I., Hwang, H. G., Hung, M. C., Lin, M. H., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of electronic signature: Executives’ perspective of hospital information department. Decision Support Systems, 44(1), 350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Choplin, R. (1992). Picture archiving and communication systems: An overview. Radiographics, 12(1), 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coffey, J. W., Hoffman, R. R., Cañas, A. J., & Ford, K. M. (2002). A concept map-based knowledge modeling approach to expert knowledge sharing. In In the Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Knowledge Sharing (Virgin Islands) (pp. 212–217).Google Scholar
  25. Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2009). The NHS care record service (NHS CRS): Recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Informatics in Primary Care, 17(3), 153–160.Google Scholar
  26. Davidson, E. J., & Chismar, W. G. (2007). The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: An investigation of computerized physician order entry. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 739–758.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T. G., Jha, A. K., et al. (2008). Electronic health records in ambulatory care—A national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(1), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eley, R., Fallon, T., Soar, J., Buikstra, E., & Hegney, D. (2009). Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia’s nurses: A national survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(8), 1151–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.Google Scholar
  32. Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Ford, E. W., Menachemi, N., & Phillips, M. T. (2006). Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: When will health care be paperless. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldschmidt, P. G. (2005). HIT and MIS: Implications of health information technology and medical information systems. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grigsby, B., Brega, A. G., Bennett, R. E., Devore, P. A., Paulich, M. J., Talkington, S. G., et al. (2007). The slow pace of interactive video telemedicine adoption: The perspective of telemedicine program administrators on physician participation. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13(6), 645–656.Google Scholar
  38. Grossman, J. M., Gerland, A., Reed, M. C., & Fahlman, C. (2007). Physicians’ experiences using commercial e-prescribing systems. Health Affairs, 26(3), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gunter, T. D., & Terry, N. P. (2005). The emergence of national electronic health record architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, costs, and questions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1), e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. He, D., Yang, J., Compton, M., & Taylor, K. (2012). Authorization in cross-border eHealth systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 14, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hennington, A. H., & Janz, B. D. (2007). Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: Applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 60–80.Google Scholar
  42. Henricks, W. H. (2011). Meaningful use of electronic health records and its relevance to laboratories and pathologists. Journal of pathology informatics, 2(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
  43. Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hu, P. J., Chau, P., & Sheng, O. (2002). Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: an exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 12(3), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hu, P. J., Chau, P., Sheng, O., & Tam, K. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
  46. Jenssen, T. K., Laegreid, A., Komorowski, J., & Hovig, E. (2001). A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nature Genetics, 28(1), 21–28.Google Scholar
  47. Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Rao, S. R., Ferris, T. G., et al. (2009). Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(16), 1628–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaplan, B. (2001a). Evaluating informatics applications–clinical decision support systems literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(1), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaplan, B. (2001b). Evaluating informatics applications–some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kifle, M., Mbarika, V., & Datta, P. (2006). Interplay of cost and adoption of tele-medicine in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of tele-cardiology in Ethiopia. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(3), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim, D., & Chang, H. (2007). Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(11), 790–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003). Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(3), 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuperman, G. J., & Gibson, R. F. (2003). Computer physician order entry: benefits, costs, and issues. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., & Vedel, I. (2011). The IT productivity paradox in health: A stakeholder’s perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(2), 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Leont’ev, A. N. (1989). The problem of activity in the history of Soviet psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
  60. Lu, Y. C., Xiao, Y., Mills, M. E., Soeken, K., & Vaidya, V. (2006). Top barriers and facilitators to nurses’ PDA adoption. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2006, 1016.Google Scholar
  61. Lu, Y. C., Xiao, Y., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2005). A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(5), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mansingh, G., Rao, L., Osei-Bryson, K., & Mills, A. (2013). Profiling internet banking users: A knowledge discovery in data mining process model based approach. Information Systems Frontiers. doi: 10.1007/s10796-012-9397-2.
  63. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Masters, K. (2008). For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: A systematic review? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mayo-Smith, M. F., & Agrawal, A. (2007). Factors associated with improved completion of computerized clinical reminders across a large healthcare system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(10), 710–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McAlearney, A. S., Chisolm, D. J., Schweikhart, S., Medow, M. A., & Kelleher, K. (2007). The story behind the story: Physician skepticism about relying on clinical information technologies to reduce medical errors. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(11), 836–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Menon, N. M., & Lee, B. (2000). Cost control and production performance enhancement by IT investment and regulation changes: Evidence from the healthcare industry. Decision Support Systems, 30(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Menon, N. M., Lee, B., & Eldenburg, L. (2000). Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research, 11(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miller, C. (1993). The electronic medical record: A definition and discussion. Topics in Health Information Management, 13(3), 20–29.Google Scholar
  70. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mouttham, A., Kuziemsky, C., Langayan, D., Peyton, L., & Pereir, J. (2012). Interoperable support for collaborative, mobile, and accessible health care. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Pensacola: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.Google Scholar
  73. Ralston, J. D., Carrell, D., Reid, R., Anderson, M., Moran, M., & Hereford, J. (2007). Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: Patient use and satisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(6), 798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reardon, J. L., & Davidson, E. (2007). An organizational learning perspective on the assimilation of electronic medical records among small physician practices. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 681–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sadeghi, P., Benyoucef, M., & Kuziemsky, C. (2012). A Mashup based framework for multi level healthcare interoperability. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W., Jr., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2004). How to build social science theories. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  78. Sittig, D. F., & Steed, W. W. (1994). Computer based physician order entry: The state of the art. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1(2), 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Snyder, R., & Fields, W. Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2007, 1117.Google Scholar
  80. Sun, J. (2012). Why different people prefer different systems for different tasks: An activity perspective on technology adoption in a dynamic user environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teoh, S. Y., Pan, S. L., & Ramchand, A. M. (2012). Resource management activities in healthcare information systems: A process perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(3), 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation (Vol. 273). Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  83. Tremblay, M., Berndt, D., Luther, S., Foulis, P., & French, D. (2009). Identifying fall-related injuries: Text mining the electronic medical record. Information Technology and Management, 10(4), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  85. Ward, R., Stevens, C., Brentnall, P., & Briddon, J. (2008). The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: A comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 25(2), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ware, H., Mullett, C. J., & Jagannathan, V. (2009). Natural language processing framework to assess clinical conditions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weber-Jahnke, J., Peyton, L., & Topaloglou, T. (2012). eHealth system interoperability. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Texas-Rio Grande ValleyEdinburgUSA
  2. 2.School of ManagementFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations