Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 105–117 | Cite as

Knowledge-based clinical pathway for medical quality improvement

  • Hongqiao Yang
  • Weizi LiEmail author
  • Kecheng Liu
  • Junping Zhang
Article

Abstract

Clinical pathways have been adopted for various diseases in clinical departments for quality improvement as a result of standardization of medical activities in treatment process. Using knowledge-based decision support on the basis of clinical pathways is a promising strategy to improve medical quality effectively. However, the clinical pathway knowledge has not been fully integrated into treatment process and thus cannot provide comprehensive support to the actual work practice. Therefore this paper proposes a knowledge-based clinical pathway management method which contributes to make use of clinical knowledge to support and optimize medical practice. We have developed a knowledge-based clinical pathway management system to demonstrate how the clinical pathway knowledge comprehensively supports the treatment process. The experiences from the use of this system show that the treatment quality can be effectively improved by the extracted and classified clinical pathway knowledge, seamless integration of patient-specific clinical pathway recommendations with medical tasks and the evaluating pathway deviations for optimization.

Keywords

Clinical pathway Quality improvement Knowledge-based system Decision support for pathway management Medical service quality 

References

  1. Andrew, P. S., & William, B. R. (1999). Information systems frontiers in knowledge management. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(3), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barjis, J., Gupta, A., & Sharda, R. (2010). Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises. Information Systems Frontiers. doi: 10.1007/s10796-010-9240-6.Google Scholar
  3. Blaser, R., Schnabel, M., Biber, C., Baumlein, M., Heger, O., Beyer, M., et al. (2007). Improving pathway compliance and clinician performance by using information technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, S. (2001). Computerised clinical pathway as process quality improvement tool. Studies in health technology and informatics, 84(Pt 2), 1135–1139.Google Scholar
  5. Cuggia, M., Rossille, D., Arnault, A., Bouget, J., & Le Beux, P. (2007). Towards a decision support system for optimising clinical pathways of elderly patients in an emergency department. Paper presented at the Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics; Building Sustainable Health Systems, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Darden, L. (2002). Strategies for discovering mechanisms: schema instantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward chaining. Philosophy of Science, 69, S354–S365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, productivity & competitive position. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eige, K. (2004). Clinical pathway compliance and quality improvement. Nursing standard, 18, 33–35.Google Scholar
  9. Elson, R. B., & Connelly, D. P. (1995). Computerized decision support systems in primary care. Prim Care, 22, 365–384.Google Scholar
  10. Friedlin, J., Dexter, P. R., & Overhage, J. M. (2007). Details of a successful clinical decision support system. Paper presented at the AMIA Annual SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimshaw, J. M., & Russell, I. T. (1993). Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet, 342(8883), 1317–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurley, K. F., & Abidi, S. S. R. (2007). Ontology engineering to model clinical pathways: towards the computerization and execution of clinical pathways. Paper presented at CBMS ’07: Proceedings of the Twentieth IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Maribor, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, M. E., Langton, K. B., Haynes, R. B., & Mathieu, A. (1994). Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome: a critical appraisal of research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 135–142.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn, K. A., Lenz, R., Elstner, T., Siegele, H., & Moll, R. (2003). Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Information in Medicine, 42, 37–44.Google Scholar
  15. Lenz, R., & Kuhn, K. A. (2004). Towards a continuous evolution and adaptation of information systems in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lenz, R., & Reichert, M. (2005). It support for healthcare processes. In B. B. W. van der Aalst, F. Casati, & F. Curbera (Eds.), Business process management (pp. 354–363). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2008). Normative modeling for personalized clinical pathway using organizational semiotics methods. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Computer Science and Computational Technology, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  18. Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2009). An agent based approach for customized clinical pathway. Paper presented at the 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, Chengdu, China.Google Scholar
  19. Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2010). A semiotic multi-agent modeling approach for clinical pathway management. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 266–273.Google Scholar
  20. Lobach, D. F., Kawamoto, K., Anstrom, K. J., Russell, M. L., Woods, P., & Smith, D. (2007). Development, deployment and usability of a point-of-care decision support system for chronic disease management using the recently-approved hl7 decision support service standard. Studies in health technology and informatics, 129(Pt 2), 861–865.Google Scholar
  21. Luc, K. D., & Todd, J. (2003). E-pathways: Computers and the patient’s journey through care. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mathe, J. L., Martin, J. B., Miller, A., Lédeczi, Á., Weavind, L. M., Nadas, A., et al. (2009). A model-integrated, guideline-driven, clinical decision-support system. IEEE Software, 26(4), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maviglia, S. M., Zielstorff, R. D., Paterno, M., Teich, J. M., Bates, D. W., & Kuperman, G. J. (2003). Automating complex guidelines for chronic disease: lessons learned. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McManus, J. (2000). Quality meets process improvement. Management Services, 44(5), 14–16.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenstein, A. H. (1999). Inpatient clinical decision support systems: determining the roi. Health Financial Management, 53(2), 51–55.Google Scholar
  26. Rutherford, W. E., & Gibney, R. (1997). End-stage renal disease: a proving ground for quality improvement in health care. Seminars in Nephrology, 17(3), 218–225.Google Scholar
  27. Sakofsky, S. (1996). Solving the corrective action dilemma. Journal for Quality & Participation, 19(6), 56–58.Google Scholar
  28. Shiffman, R. N., Liaw, Y., Brandt, C. A., & Corb, G. J. (1999). Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wakamiya, S., & Yamauchi, K. (2009). What are the standard functions of electronic clinical pathways? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang, H., & Li, W. (2009). Modeling requirement driven architecture of adaptive healthcare system based on semiotics. Paper presented at the International Forum on Information Technology and Applications (IFITA), Chengdu, China.Google Scholar
  31. Yang, H., & Li, W. (2009). An ontology-based approach for data integration in regionally interoperable healthcare systems. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  32. Yang, H., Liu, K., & Li, W. (2010). Adaptive requirement-driven architecture for integrated healthcare systems. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yasnoff, W. A., & Miller, P. L. (2003). Decision support and expert systems in public health. In Public health informatics and information systems (pp. 494–512). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Zielstorff, R. D. (1998). Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongqiao Yang
    • 1
  • Weizi Li
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kecheng Liu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Junping Zhang
    • 4
  1. 1.Hospital 309 of People’s Liberation ArmyBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Informatics Research CentreUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  4. 4.Carefx CorporationScottsdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations