Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 19–42 | Cite as

Ski hill injuries and ghost charts: Socio-technical issues in achieving e-Health interoperability across jurisdictions

  • Ellen Balka
  • Sandra Whitehouse
  • Shannon T. Coates
  • Dug Andrusiek
Article

Abstract

This paper looks at the challenges associated with consolidating and leveraging patient information recorded at various points in a distributed, multi-jurisdictional health care system. We draw on insights from two ethnographic case studies to illuminate varied issues related to interoperability of information management systems. Our first case study is an investigation of duplicate medical charts which exist in several ambulatory care clinics located on the same campus at an acute care hospital. The second case study is an ongoing exploratory project intended to develop an understanding of information collection, storage and handover procedures in the pre-hospital care chain, a health care domain that includes varied actors and organizations with different information needs. Whereas findings from our case studies show that achievement of interoperability will be difficult, our analysis suggests ways to begin to overcome these challenges.

Keywords

Socio-technical issues Interoperability Handovers in care Data handovers Ghost charts Shadow records Duplicate medical charts Electronic health records Interoperability 

References

  1. Accreditation Canada. (2008a). Patient safety area 2: Communication. Accreditation Canada. http://www.accreditation-canada.ca/upload/files/pdf/ROPs%20EN%202007/PS%20ROP%20communication_info%20transfer_EN.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2010.
  2. Accreditation Canada. (2008b). Patient safety area 2: Communication. Accreditation Canada. http://www.accreditation-canada.ca/upload/files/pdf/ROPs%20EN%202007/PS%20ROP%20communication_patient%20client%20education_EN.pdf Accessed 30 June 2010.
  3. Alvarado, K., Lee, R., Christoffersen, E., Fram, N., Boblin, S., Poole, N., et al. (2006). Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety. Healthcare Quarterly, 9, 75–79.Google Scholar
  4. Amatayakul, M. (2003). HIPAA reins in shadow charts, independent databases. The Journal of AHIMA, 74, 16A–16C.Google Scholar
  5. American Health Information Management Association. (2011). Frequently asked questions. American Health Information Management Association. http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_017169.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_017169. Accessed 15 November 2010.
  6. American Medical Informatics Association, Board of Directors. (1997). A Proposal to Improve Quality, Increase Efficiency, and Expand Access in the U.S. Health Care System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4, 340–341.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Medical Association. (2006). Safe handover: Safe patients. Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers Australian medical Association. www.ama.com.au/system/files/node/4064/Clinical_Handover.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2010.
  8. Balka, E. (2008). Preliminary report: Clinical records and hospital charts: Implications for computerization. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, Assessment of Technology in Context Design Lab.Google Scholar
  9. Balka, E., & Whitehouse, S. (2007). Whose work practice? Situating an electronic triage system within a complex system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 130, 59–74.Google Scholar
  10. Balka, E., Wagner, I., & Jensen, C. (2005). Reconfiguring critical computing in an era of configurability. In. O.W. Bertelsen, N.O. Bouvin, P.G. Krough & Kyng, M. (Eds.). Critical Computing- Between Sense and Sensibility. Proceedings of the Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, August 20–24, 2005 (pp. 79–88) New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  11. Berg, M. (2004). Health information management: Integrating information technology in Health Care work. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brailer, D. J. (2005). Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. Health Affairs, Suppl Web Exclusives, W5-19-W5-21.Google Scholar
  14. Broder, C. (2004). Case study: Utah physician practice saves with EMR system. Washington, DC: Advisory Board Company. http://www.allscripts.com/marketing/articles/Utah_Physician_Practice_Saves.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2009.
  15. Canadian Health Coalition. (1998). Ensuring medicare's future: A submission to the Department of Finance and the alternative federal budget process. Ottawa: Canadian Health Coalition.Google Scholar
  16. Canada Health Infoway. (2010). About Infoway. Canada Health Infoway. http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/lang-en/about-infoway. Accessed 10 June 2010 .
  17. Canada Health Infoway. (2006). EHRs blueprint (Version 2). https://www2.infoway-inforoute.ca/Documents/EHRS-Blueprint-v2-Exec-Overview.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2011.
  18. Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. (2004). Accreditation survey report, Capital Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation.Google Scholar
  19. Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. (2007). Accreditation survey report, Capital Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation.Google Scholar
  20. Chacko, V., Varvarelis, N., & Kemp, D. G. (2006). eHand-offs: An IBM Lotus Domino application for ensuring patient safety and enhancing resident supervision in hand-off communications. AMIA …Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium.:874, 2006, 874.Google Scholar
  21. Chevalier, S., Choinière, R., Bernier, L., Sauvageau, Y., Masson, I., & Cadieux, E. (1992). User guide to 40 community health indicators. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada, Community Health Division.Google Scholar
  22. Coleman, E. A. (2003). Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department of Veteran’s Affairs & Office of the Inspector General. (2007). Healthcare inspection: Infusion clinic closure and patient notification (Rep. No. 07-03298-048). Las Vegas: VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System.Google Scholar
  24. Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-Health? Journal of Medical Internet Research. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbons, P., Arzt, N., Burke-Beebe, S., Chute, C., Dickinson, G., Flewelling, T., et al. (2007). Coming to terms: Scoping interoperability for health care. Health Level Seven EHR Interoperability Work Group. http://www.hln.com/assets/pdf/Coming-to-Terms-February-2007.pdf. Accessed 27 October 2010.
  26. Gottschalk, P. (2009). Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutheil, T. G. (1994). Documentation: burden or blessing? Journal of the American Association for Medical Transcription, 13(2), 39.Google Scholar
  28. Haggerty, J., Reid, R., Freeman, G., Starfield, B., Adair, C., et al. (2003). Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British medical journal, 327, 1219–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrington, S. (2004). Record rollout for physicians. Health Management Technology, 25(8), 18–25.Google Scholar
  30. Health Canada. (2010). Canada’s Health Care System (Medicare). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/medi-assur/index-eng.php. Accessed 1 November 2010.
  31. Heckman, T. (2008). Tips to avoid trouble. Information letter. The Canadian Medical Protective Association, 23, 3.Google Scholar
  32. Heckman, T. C. (1997). Transfer of care can create problems. Information letter: The Canadian medical protective association, 12, 4–5.Google Scholar
  33. Helmer, W. (2005). Communication vital when transferring care of a patient. Information letter: The Canadian medical protective association, 20, 1.Google Scholar
  34. Heubusch, K. (2006). Interoperability: what it means, why it matters. Journal of AHIMA, 77(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  35. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (1990). IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic health record system: Letter report. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  37. JCAHO. (2003). Sentinel event statistics. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/Statistics Accessed 30 June 2010.
  38. JCAHO. (2007). FAQ’s for the Joint Commissions 2007 national patient safety goals. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/07_npsg_faqs.htm. Accessed 30 June 2010.
  39. Jenkin, A., Belson-Mitchell, N., & Cooper, S. (2007). Patient handover: time for a change? Accident & Emergency Nursing, 15, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Juzwishin, D. (2009). Political, policy and social barriers to health system interoperability: emerging opportunities of Web 2.0 and 3.0. Healthcare Management Forum, 22(4), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaplan, B., & Shaw, N. T. (2002). People, organizational and social issues: Evaluation as an exemplar. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 91–102.Google Scholar
  42. Knaup, P., Pilz, J., & Thalheimer, M. (2006). Can temporary paper-based patient records sensibly complete an electronic patient record? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 124, 207–212.Google Scholar
  43. Kofax Image Products. (2011). Removing the 'Shadow' from Electronic Medical Records. http://www.isit.com/st/documents/document3240.htm. Viewed April 13, 2011.
  44. Laughnan, E. (2005). Rodney Dykehouse of Froedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin warns against tech for its own sake. Fusion CIO. Madision, WI: WTN Media. http://wistechnology.com/fusioncio/article/1750/. Accessed 10 Nov 2010.
  45. Lowes, R. (2004). Practice pointers: how to win the paper (chart) chase. Journal of Medical Economics, 81, 40–45.Google Scholar
  46. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. McArthur, W., Ramsay, C., & Walker M. (2001). Improving health care for Canadians. Part II of healthy incentives: Canadian health care reform in the international context. http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/300/fraser/healthreform/improving.htm. Accessed 10 August 2001.
  48. Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. National Alliance for Health Information Technology. (2005). What is interoperability? www.nahit.org. Accessed 4 March 2007.
  50. Nausbaum, M. (2010). Looking for interoperability in all the right places. Guest Editorial. Healthcare Information Management & Communication, 24 (1), 6.Google Scholar
  51. openEHR. (2007). Aims of the openEHR architecture. http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.1/html/architecture/overview/Output/aims.html. Accessed 25 February 2011.
  52. Pothier, D., Monteiro, P., Mooktiar, M., & Shaw, A. (2005). Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. British Journal of Nursing, 14, 1090–1093.Google Scholar
  53. Schuurman, N., & Balka, E. (2009). Alt.meta.data: Ontological context for data use and integration. Journal of computer supported cooperative work, 18, 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., Haynes, R. B., Kaplan, B., Lehmann, H., et al. (2001). Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8, 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shetty, V., Murphy, D. A., Zigler, C., Resell, J., & Yamashita, D. D. (2008). Accuracy of data collected by surgical residents. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 66, 1335–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, R. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stegwee, R., & Rukanova, B. (2003). Identification of different types of standards for domain-specific interoperability. Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems MISQ Special Issue Workshop, pp. 161–170Google Scholar
  58. Stone, E. (2005). Shared care: issues you should consider. Information sheet: The Canadian medical protective association.Google Scholar
  59. Stoop, A. P., & Berg, M. (2003). Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in patient care information system evaluation: Guidance for the organizational decision maker. Methods of information in Medicine, 42(4), 458–62.Google Scholar
  60. Streitenberger, K., Breen-Reid, K., & Harris, C. (2006). Handoffs in care–can we make them safer? Pediatric clinics of North America, 53, 1185–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  62. Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 38, 56–64.Google Scholar
  63. Tolar, M., & Balka, E. (2010). Beyond individual patient care: Enhanced use of EMR data and changing work practices in a primary care setting. Proceeding of the Information Technology and Healthcare Conference, Victoria, BC, February 24–27.Google Scholar
  64. Wikipedia. (2010). Interoperability. Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interoperability. Accessed 6 July 2010.
  65. Wong, M. C., Yee, K. C., & Turner, P. (2008). Clinical handover literature review University of Tasmania, Australia: eHealth services research group.Google Scholar
  66. Yasnoff, W. A., O'Carroll, P. W., Koo, D., Linkins, R. W., & Kilbourne, E. M. (2000). Public health informatics: Improving and transforming public health in the information age. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 6, 67–75.Google Scholar
  67. Ye, K., McD Taylor, D., Knott, J. C., Dent, A., & MacBean, C. E. (2007). Handover in the emergency department: Deficiencies and adverse effects. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 19, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Designs and methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen Balka
    • 1
  • Sandra Whitehouse
    • 2
  • Shannon T. Coates
    • 3
  • Dug Andrusiek
    • 4
  1. 1.School of CommunicationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsBC Children’s HospitalVancouverCanada
  3. 3.School of Interactive Arts + Technology (SIAT)Simon Fraser University SurreySurreyCanada
  4. 4.School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations