Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 179–193 | Cite as

Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective

  • Syaiful AliEmail author
  • Peter GreenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Effective IT governance will ensure alignment between IT and business goals. Organizations with ineffective IT governance will suffer due to poor performance of IT resources such as inaccurate information quality, inefficient operating costs, runaway IT project and even the demise of its IT department. This study seeks to examine empirically the individual IT governance mechanisms that influence the overall effectiveness of IT governance. Furthermore, this study examines the relationship of effective IT governance, the extent of IT outsourcing decisions within the organizations, and the level of IT Intensity in the organizations. We used structural equation modeling analysis to examine 110 responses from members of ISACA (Information Systems and Audit Control Association) Australia in which their organizations have outsourced their IT functions. Results suggest significant positive relationships between the overall level of effective IT governance and the following mechanisms: the involvement of senior management in IT, the existence of ethic or culture of compliance in IT, and corporate communication systems.

Keywords

IT Governance IT Intensity IT Outsourcing SEM Australia 

References

  1. Ali, S., & Green, P. (2007). Effective IT Governance Mechanisms in Public Sectors: An Australian Context. International Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 15(4), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyer, J. M., & Nino, D. (1999). Ethics and Cultures in International Business. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(3), 287–297. doi: 10.1177/105649269983006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–195. doi: 10.2307/3250983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, P. L., Cheung, M. D., & Rohde, F. H. (2007). Enhancing IT Governance Practices: A Model and Case Study of an Organization’s Efforts. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadbent, M. (1998). Leading Governance, Business and IT Processes: The Organizational Fabric of Business and IT Partnership. Finding Gartner Group.Google Scholar
  7. Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2003). Using Resource-based Theory to Interpret the Successful Adoption and Use of Information Systems and Technology in Manufacturing Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callahan, J., & Keyes, D.(2004). The evolution of IT Governance @ NB Power. In Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for Information Technology Governance: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cerpa, N., & Verner, J. M. (1998). Case Study: The Effect of IS Maturity on Information Systems Strategic Planning. Information & Management, 34, 199–208. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00060-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, Y.-C.L., & Ho, S.-J.K.(2000). The Use of Balanced Scorecard in Canadian Hospitals. Visited 1 February 2005, http://aaahq.org/NERegion/2000/q.17.pdf.
  11. Clarkson, P., Ferguson, C., & Hall, J. (2003). Auditor Conservatism and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from the Year 2000 Systems Issues. Accounting and Finance, 43, 21–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-629X.00081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clemons, E. K. (1991). Corporate Strategies for Information Technology: A Resource-Based Approach. Computer, 24(11), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlberg, T., & Lahdelma, P.(2007). IT Governance Maturity and IT Outsourcing Degree: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. De Haes, S., & Grembergen, W.V.(2005). IT Governance Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms: Achieving IT/Business Alignment in a Major Belgian Financial Group. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Dehning, B., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 637–656.Google Scholar
  16. Earl, M. J. (1993). Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning. MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 1–24. doi: 10.2307/249507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, J., Hirschheim, R., & Jacobs, R. (2008). Understanding the Outsourcing Learning Curve: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Large Australian Company. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 165–178. doi: 10.1007/s10796-008-9070-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213–236. doi: 10.2307/249689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottschalk, P. (1999). Implementation Prediction of Strategic Information Systems Plan. Information & Management, 36, 77–91. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00008-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, J. A., & Liedtka, S. L. (2005). Financial Performance, CEO Compensation, and Large-Scale Information Technology Outsourcing Decision. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 193–221.Google Scholar
  21. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Hardy, G. (2003). Coordinating IT Governance--A New Role for IT Strategy Committees. Information Systems Control Journal, 4.Google Scholar
  23. Henderson, J. C., Venkatraman, N., & Oldach, S. (1993). Continuous Strategic Alignment, Exploiting Information Technology Capabilities for Competitive Success. European Management Journal, 11(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Institute, I.T. Governance. (2003a). IT Governance Global Status Report. 2003. IT Governance Institute. Visited 1 February 2005. Http://www.itgi.org/Template_ITGI.cfm?Section=ITGIandCONTENTID=14539andTEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDispl
  25. Institute, I.T. Governance. (2003b). Board Briefing on IT Governance. IT Governance Institute. Visited 31 January 2005. http://www.isaca.org/Content/ContentGroups/ITGI3/Resources1/Board_Briefing_on_IT_Governance/26904_Board_Briefing_final.pdf.
  26. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Ives, B. (1991). Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 205–227. doi: 10.2307/249382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context. Information Systems Research, 4, 342–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karimi, J., Bhattacherjee, A., Gupta, Y. P., & Somers, T. M. (2000). The Effect of MIS Steering Committees on Information Technology Management Sophistication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 207–230.Google Scholar
  29. Knapp, K., Sharma, S., & King, K. (2007). Macro-Economic and social Impacts of offshore outsourcing of Information Technology: Practitioner and academic Perspectives. International Journal of E-Business Research, 3(4), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luftman, J., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment. California Management Review, 42(1), 109–122.Google Scholar
  31. Luftman, J. (2000). Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity. Communications of AIS, 4.Google Scholar
  32. Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  33. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based Analysis. MIS Quarterly (19:4), pp. 487–505.Google Scholar
  34. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1996). The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-related behavior in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 461–476. doi: 10.2307/3857499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKeen, J. D., & Guimaraes, T. (1985). Selecting MIS Projects by Steering Committee. Communications of the ACM, 28(12), 1344–1352. doi: 10.1145/214956.214965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, N. D. (2004). Systemic IS Governance: An Introduction. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 23–34. doi: 10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84184.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nath, R. (1989). Aligning MIS with the Business Goals. Information & Management, 16, 71–79. doi: 10.1016/0378-7206(81)90073-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nolan, R. L. (1982). Managing Information Systems by Committee. Harvard Business Review, 66, 72–79.Google Scholar
  39. Peterson, R. (2004a). Crafting Information Technology Governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22. doi: 10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peterson, R. (2004b). Information Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance. In Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for Information Technology Governance: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Premkumar, G., & King, W. R. (1994). The Evaluation of Strategic Information System Planning. Information & Management, 26, 327–340. doi: 10.1016/0378-7206(94)90030-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Alignment between Business and IT Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113. doi: 10.2307/3250980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robb, A. & Parent, M. (2009). Understanding IT Governance: A Case of Two Financial Mutuals. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(3), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rockart, J. F. (1988). The Line Takes the Leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 29, 57–64.Google Scholar
  45. Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 125–153.Google Scholar
  46. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: a theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 261–290. doi: 10.2307/249754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sampler, J., & Weill, P. (2003). Core Incompetencies. Research Briefing, III(no. 1B).Google Scholar
  48. Sabherwal, R. (1999). The Relationship between Information System Planning Sophistication and Information System Success: An Empirical Assessment. Decision Sciences, 30(1), 137–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01604.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salmela, H., Lederer, A. L., & Reponen, T. (2000). Information systems planning in a turbulent environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1057/palgrave/ejis/3000339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuman, S. P., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1991). Decision Conference for Systems Planning. Information & Management, 21, 147–159. doi: 10.1016/0378-7206(91)90061-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwartz, E. (2004). Information Age: 48.Google Scholar
  52. Sohal, A. S., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2002). IT Governance and Management in Large Australian Organizations. International Journal of Production Economics, 75, 97–112. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00184-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sohal, A. S., & Ng, L. (1998). The Role and Impact of Information Technology in Australian Business. Journal of Information Technology, 13, 201–217. doi: 10.1080/026839698344846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Starre, D., & De Jong, B. (1998). IT Governance and Management. Nolan: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  55. Strassmann, P. A. (2004). Most Outsourcing is Still for Losers. Computerworld, Feb 2, 38.5.Google Scholar
  56. Teng, J.T.C. Cheon, M.J. & Grover, V. (1995). Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions: Testing a Strategy-Theoretic Discrepancy Model. Decision Sciences, Vol 26, No. 1.Google Scholar
  57. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. (1999). Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Works and What Hurts. California Management Review, Winter, 41(2), 131–151.Google Scholar
  58. Van Grembergen, W. V., De Haes, S., & Guldentops, E. (2004). Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance. In Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for Information Technology Governance: pp.1-36: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Vaswani, R. (2003). Determinants of Effective Information Technology (IT) Governance. Australia: Unpublished Thesis, School of Business, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  60. Weill, P. (2004). Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT, CISR Working Paper: CISR MIT.Google Scholar
  61. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  62. Willcocks, L., & Lacity, M.(1999). Information Technology Outsourcing—Practices, Lessons and Prospects. ASX Perspective, pp.44-49.Google Scholar
  63. Williamson, O.E. (1989). Transaction Costs Economics", Handbook of Industrial Organization, R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, Vol. 1, 136-178.Google Scholar
  64. Woodhead, B. (2004). After the Sky fell in on Atlas, The Australian. Financial Review, ▪▪▪, 36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations