Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 211–224 | Cite as

The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success

  • Kim WüllenweberEmail author
  • Daniel Beimborn
  • Tim Weitzel
  • Wolfgang König


What is the impact of business process standardization on business process outsourcing (BPO) success? This paper argues that there is a direct impact of process standardization on BPO success, due to production cost economies, and also an indirect effect via improved contractual and relational governance resulting from better monitoring opportunities and facilitated communication and coordination. This threefold impact of standardization on BPO success is empirically confirmed using data from 335 BPO ventures in 215 German banks.


Business process outsourcing Business process standardization Outsourcing governance 



We are greatly indebted to Jens Dibbern for his thoughtful comments and suggestions that helped us to substantially improve this paper. Also, we would like to thank Rudy Hirschheim, Armin Heinzl, and the participants of the ICOIS 2007 conference for their valuable support. We are also grateful for the financial support of the E-Finance Lab.


  1. Anderson, J., & Narus, J. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, S., & Straub, D. (1998). Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 4, 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, R., Clemons, E. K., & Reddi, S. (2005). Just right outsourcing: Understanding and managing risk. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 37–55.Google Scholar
  4. Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (1998). Assessing the risk of IT outsourcing. In 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., Rivard, S., & Smith, H. (2001). IT outsourcing risk management at British Petroleum. In 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Aubert, B. A., Houde, J.-F., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (2003). Characteristics of IT outsourcing contracts. In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Auguste, B. G., Hao, Y., Singer, M., & Wiegand, M. (2002). The other side of outsourcing. McKinsey Quarterly, 2002(1), 52–63.Google Scholar
  8. Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). The role of measurement in theory construction and hypothesis testing: Toward a holistic model. In O. C. Ferrell, S. W. Brown, & C. W. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 15–32). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489 September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.Google Scholar
  11. Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable market and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Borman, M. (2006). Applying multiple perspectives to the BPO decision: A case study of call centres in Australia. Journal of Information Technology, 21, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braun, M. (2004). Vom IT- zum business process outsourcing. Bankmagazin, 53(2), 22.Google Scholar
  15. Cachon, G., & Harker, P. (2002). Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Science, 48(10), 1314–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoluides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing, 16, 64–73 February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Davenport, T. (2005). The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review, 83, 100–108 June.Google Scholar
  20. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.Google Scholar
  21. Dayasindhu, N. (2004). Information technology enabled process outsourcing and reengineering: Case study of a Mortgage Bank. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  22. de Toni, A., & Panizzolo, R. (1993). Product and process standardization in intermittent and repetitive production. Journal of Production Research, 31(6), 12–32.Google Scholar
  23. de Vries, H. (1999). Standardization. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Earl, M. J. (1996). The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review, 37, 26–32 Spring.Google Scholar
  28. Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory Part I and II. In J. M. BergerZelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–87). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (2003). Ownership and control in outsourcing to China: Estimating the property rights theory of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 729–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feeny, D. F., Willcocks, L. P., & Lacity, M. C. (2003). Business process outsourcing: The promise of theenterprise partnershipmodel. Templeton executive briefing. Oxford: Templeton College, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Fomin, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2000). How to distribute a cake before cutting it into pieces: Alice in Wonderland or radio engineers’ gang in the Nordic countries? In Information technology standards and standardization: A global perspective (pp. 222–239). Hershey: IGI.Google Scholar
  32. Ford, D., & Farmer, D. (1986). Make or buy—A key strategic issue. Long Range Planning, 19(5), 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gewald, H. (2006). Assessing the benefits and risks of business process outsourcing in the German Banking Industry. Dissertation, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  34. Gewald, H., Wüllenweber, K., & Weitzel, T. (2006). The influence of perceived risks on banking managers’ intention to outsource business processes—A study of the German banking and finance industry. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 78–96.Google Scholar
  35. Goles, T. (2001). The impact of the clientvendor relationship on information systems outsourcing success p. 230. Houston: University of Houston.Google Scholar
  36. Goles, T., & Chin, W. W. (2002). Relational exchange theory and IS outsourcing: Developing a scale to measure relationship factors. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing (pp. 221–250). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Goles, T., & Chin, W. W. (2005). Information systems outsourcing relationship factors: Detailed conceptualization and initial evidence. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(4), 47–67.Google Scholar
  38. Goo, J., Kim, D. J., & Cho, B. (2006). Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement. In Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico, 2006.Google Scholar
  39. Gottfredson, R., Puryear, R., & Phillips, S. (2005). Strategic sourcing from periphery to the core. Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 132–139.Google Scholar
  40. Govindarajan, V., & Fisher, J. (1990). Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grover, V., Cheon, M., & Teng, J. (1996). The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89–116.Google Scholar
  42. Gurbaxani, V. (1996). The new world of information technology outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 39, 45–46 (7 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Halvey, J. K., & Melby, B. M. (1996). Information technology outsourcing transactions: Processes, strategies, and contracts. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hart, O., & Moore, J. E. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henderson, J. C. (1990). Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical IS connection. Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 7–18.Google Scholar
  48. Kanter, R. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.Google Scholar
  49. Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. P. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: Theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2002). Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: The interaction approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirsch, L. J. (1996). The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  52. Lancellotti, R., Schein, O., Spang, S., & Stadler, V. (2003). ICT and operations outsourcing in banking. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 45(2), 131–141.Google Scholar
  53. Langlois, R. (1995). Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets. In C. A. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 71–100). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, J.-N., & Kim, Y.-G. (1997). Information systems outsourcing strategies for affiliated firms of the Korean Conglomerate Groups. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6(3), 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, J.-N., & Kim, Y.-G. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29–61.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, J. N., Miranda, S., & Kim, Y.-M. (2004). IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  58. Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). An empirical study of information technology outsourcing: Benefits, risk and performance implications (pp. 277–288). In Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
  59. Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Macneil, I. R. (1974). The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47(3), 691–816.Google Scholar
  61. Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2006). Successfully governing business process outsourcing relationships. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  62. Manrodt, K. B., & Vitasek, K. (2004). Global process standardization: A case study. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  63. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murray, J. D., & White, R. W. (1983). Economies of scale and economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions: A study of British Columbia credit unions. Journal of Finance, 38, 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, H. R., & Chaudhurry, A. (1996). A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Narus, J., & Anderson, J. (1987). Distribution contributions to partnerships with manufacturers. Business Horizons, 30, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peter, J. (1981). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 6–17 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. Boston: Pittman.Google Scholar
  71. Phelps, R. (2006). Process standards: Pursuing best practices. Controlling Engineering, 53, 69–74 May.Google Scholar
  72. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (1998). Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanation for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal, 19(9), 853–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91 May–June.Google Scholar
  77. Ramakumar, A., & Cooper, B. (2004). Process standardization proves profitable. Quality, 43(2), 42–45.Google Scholar
  78. Ring, P., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rouse, A. C., & Corbitt, B. (2004). IT-supported business process outsourcing (BPO): The good, the bad and the ugly. In Eight Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China, 2004.Google Scholar
  80. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Saunders, C., Gebelt, M., & Hu, Q. (1997). Achieving success in information systems outsourcing. California Management Review, 39(2), 63–80.Google Scholar
  82. Swaminathan, J. M. (2001). Enabling customization using standardized operations. California Management Review, 43(3), 125–135.Google Scholar
  83. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weitzel, T., Beimborn, D., & König, W. (2006). A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly, 30, 489–514.Google Scholar
  85. Willcocks, L. P., Lacity, M. C., & Kern, T. (1999). Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: Longitudinal case research at LISA. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(3), 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Willcocks, L., Hindle, J., Feeny, D. F., & Lacity, M. C. (2004). IT and business process outsourcing: The knowledge potential. Information Systems Management, 21, 7–15 Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  88. Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  89. Wüllenweber, K., & Weitzel, T. (2007). An empirical exploration of how process standardization reduces outsourcing risk. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS40), Hawaii, USA, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Wüllenweber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Beimborn
    • 2
  • Tim Weitzel
    • 2
  • Wolfgang König
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Information Systems, E-Finance LabJohann Wolfgang Goethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Information Systems and ServicesUniversity of BambergBambergGermany

Personalised recommendations