Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 225–241 | Cite as

Turnover intentions of Indian IS professionals

  • Mary C. Lacity
  • Vidya V. Iyer
  • Prasad S. Rudramuniyaiah
Article

Abstract

One of the major challenges facing the Indian IT services industry is the high rate of turnover among Indian IS professionals. Turnover rates have been reported as high as 100% annually. Despite the serious problem, we are unaware of any academic research that has studied the determinants of turnover among Indian IS professionals. We aim to contribute to the literature by understanding Turnover Intentions of Indian IS professionals. We developed an initial model of Turnover Intentions based on the IS and Organizational Behavior literatures. The most commonly identified determinants of Turnover Intentions in these literatures were Organizational Commitment (emotional attachment to an organization) and Job Satisfaction. However, the research that identified these determinants was primarily tested on Western workers. We assessed the applicability of this model by interviewing 25 Indian IS professionals. We found strong support that Job Satisfaction affects Turnover Intentions among Indian IS professionals. However, Organizational Commitment was found to be a troublesome construct. Many Indian participants did not relate to the concept of an emotional attachment to an organization. Instead, they talked in terms that better mapped to the construct Organizational Satisfaction. The interviews also uncovered another important determinant of Turnover Intention: Social Norms. Social Norms, as evidenced by significant family pressure to reside in the same city as the employee’s family, emerged as a major reason for Turnover Intentions. Our revised model identifies Job Satisfaction, Organizational Satisfaction, and Social Norms as the main determinants of Turnover Intentions among Indian IS Professionals. We also identify four implications for practice. The most worrisome implication for Western clients is that Indian IS professionals do not like performing routine IT maintenance work or merely programming from predefined specifications—the bulk of work sent offshore. Indian IS professionals preferred client-facing activities, design and development work.

Keywords

Turnover Indian IS professionals Job satisfaction Organizational commitment Organizational satisfaction Social norms Job attraction Job stress Perceived organizational support 

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Brown, C., Ferratt, T., & Moore, J. E. (2006). Five mindsets for retaining IT Staff. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(3), 137–150 September.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, R., Ferratt, T., & De, P. (2007). “An Experimental Investigation of Turnover Intentions Among New Entrants in IT,” Database for Advances in Information Systems, February 2007, pp.8–28.Google Scholar
  3. Ahuja, M., Chudoba, K., Kacmar, C., McKnight, D., & George, J. (2007). IT road warriors: balancing work–family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 1–17 March.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, N., & Meyer, J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. Ang, S., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Turnover of IT professionals: The effects of internal labor market strategies. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(3), 11–27 Summer.Google Scholar
  7. Argyris, C. (1957). The individual and organization: Some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arthur, W., Bell, S., Villado, A., & Doverspike, D. (2006). The use of person-organizational fit in employment decision-making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 786–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baroudi, J. (1985). The impact of role variables on IS personnel work attitudes and intentions. MIS Quarterly, 9(4), 341–356 December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourne, H., & Jenkins, M. (2005). Eliciting manager’s personal values: An adaptation of the laddering interview method. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 410–428 October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carsten, J., & Spector, P. (1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of the Munchinsky Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, M., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 586–605.Google Scholar
  13. Cotton, J., & Tuttle, J. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. The Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(1), 78–96 August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferratt, T., Agarwal, R., Brown, C., & Moore, J. E. (2005). IT human resource management configurations and IT turnover: Theoretical synthesis and empirical analysis. Information Systems Research, 16(3), 237–255 September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Gallivan, M. (2004). Examining IT professionals’ adaptation to technological change: The influence of gender and personal attributes. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(3), 28–49 Summer.Google Scholar
  18. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, 1967, reprinted 1999.Google Scholar
  19. Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Gupta, P. (2001). Growth scenario of IT industries in India. Communications of the ACM, 44(7), 40–41 July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, Y., & Gupta, M. (1990). A process model to study the impact of role variables on turnover intentions of IS personnel. Computers in Industry, 15(3), 211–239 November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1980). Work redesign. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Harrison, D., Newman, D., & Roth, P. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Metal-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman, B., & Woehr, D. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person-organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2ndnnd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Hom, P., Caranikas-Walker, F., & Prussia, G. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 890–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Igbaria, M., & Greenhaus, J. (1992). Determinants of MIS employees’ turnover intentions: A structural equation model. Communications of the ACM, 35(2), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Bawawy, M. (1994). Work experiences, job involvement, and quality of work life among IS personnel. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang, J., & Klein, G. (2002). A discrepancy model of information systems personnel turnover. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 249–272 Fall.Google Scholar
  32. Joiner, T., & Bakalis, S. (2006). The antecedents of organizational commitment: The case of Australian casual academics. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joseph, D., Ng, K., Koh, C., & Ang, S. (2007). Turnover of IT professionals: A narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 1–31.Google Scholar
  34. Kelly, H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Kim, S., Price, J., Mueller, C., & Watson, T. (1996). The determination of career intent among physicians at a US Air Force Hospital. Human Relations, 49, 947–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kittiruengcharn, N. (1997). Impacts of Job and Organizational Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment on Turnover Intentions in Thai Public Sector Engineers, Doctoral Thesis, Concordia University, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Kopelman, R., Prottas, D., Thompsom, C., & White Jahn, E. (2006). A multi-level examination of work-life practices: Is more always better? Journal of Managerial Issues, XVIII, 232–254 Summer.Google Scholar
  38. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  39. Mahoney, C. (1997). Common Qualitative Techniques,” in Use-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations, Published by the Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication for the National Science Foundation, publication number NSF97-153, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  40. Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences of Organizational Commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  42. McCue, A. (2005). “High Staff Turnover Hits India Offshore Firms,” Silicon Research, January 2005, available on: http://www.silicon.com/research/specialreports/offshoring/0,3800003026,39127243,00.htm/.
  43. McMurtrey, M., Grover, V., Teng, J., & Lightner, N. (2002). Job satisfaction of information technology workers: The impact of career orientation and task automation in a CASE Environment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 273–302 Fall.Google Scholar
  44. Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). How family-friendly work environments affect family/work conflict: A meta-analytical examination. Journal of Labor Research, XXVIII(4), 555–574 Fall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, A. (2004). “Offshore Labor Markets Impact IT Outsourcing,” Technewsworld, September 28, 2004 available online at http://www.technewsworld.com/story/36949.html.
  47. Mitchell, A. (2005). “India Maintains Outsourcing Advantage,” E-commerce Times, May 3, 2005, available on http://crmbuyer.com/story/42781.html.
  48. Mitchell, A. (2007). “Pakistan Now a Hot Spot for IT Outsourcing,” Medialinkers, 2007, available on http://www.medialinkers.com/itoutsourcingpakistan.html.
  49. Mitchell, T., Holtom, B., Lee, T., Sablynski, C., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mobley, W., Horner, S., & Hollingsworth, A. (1978). An Evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moore, J. E. (2000). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moore, J. E., & Burke, L. (2002). “How to Turn Around ‘Turnaround Culture” in IT, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, 2, February 2002, pp. 73–78.Google Scholar
  53. Niederman, F., & Sumner, M. (2004). Effects of tasks, salaries, and shocks on job satisfaction among IS professionals. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(4), 49–72 October–December.Google Scholar
  54. Pervin, L. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a Discussion of Theoretical Models. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rhodes, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers, E. M. (2006). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rouse, P. (2001). Voluntary turnover related to information technology professionals: A review of rational and instinctual models. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(3), 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rusbult, C., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sethi, V., Barrier, T., & King, R. (1999). An Examination of the Correlates of Burnout in IS Professionals. Information Resources Management Journal, 12(3), 5–13 Jul–Sept.Google Scholar
  61. Shore, L., & Tetrick, L. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spector, P. (1996). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Steel, R., & Griffeth, R. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: A methodological or conceptual artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 7 4(6), 846–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sujdak, E. (2002). An Investigation of the Correlation of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Perceived Job Opportunity, Organizational Communications, Job Search Behavior, and the Intent to Turnover in IT Professionals, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Wayne Huizenga School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University.Google Scholar
  66. Szamosi, L. (2006). “Just What are Tomorrow’s SME Employees Looking for?” Education & Training, Vol. 48, 8/9, pp. 654–665.Google Scholar
  67. Tett, R., & Meyer, J. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293 Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Dam, K. (2005). Employee attitudes toward job changes: An application and extension of Rusbult and Farrell’s investment model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Willcocks, L., & Lacity, M. (2006). Global sourcing of business and IT services. United Kingdom: Palgravew.Google Scholar
  70. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rdnrd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary C. Lacity
    • 1
  • Vidya V. Iyer
    • 1
  • Prasad S. Rudramuniyaiah
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Missouri-St. Louis, College of BusinessUniversity of MissouriSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations