Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 9, Issue 2–3, pp 195–208 | Cite as

Integrated model-driven dashboard development

  • Themis PalpanasEmail author
  • Pawan Chowdhary
  • George Mihaila
  • Florian Pinel
Article

Abstract

Business performance modeling and model-driven business transformation are two research directions that are attracting much attention lately. In this study, we propose an approach for dashboard development that is model-driven and can be integrated with the business performance models. We adopt the business performance modeling framework, and we extend it in order to capture the reporting aspect of the business operation. We describe models that can effectively represent all the elements necessary for the business performance reporting process, and the interactions among them. We demonstrate how all these models can be combined and automatically generate the final solution. We further extend the proposed framework with mechanisms that can detect changes in the models and incrementally update the deployed solutions. Finally, we discuss our experience from the application of our technique in a real-world scenario. This case study shows that our technique can be efficiently applied to and handle changes in the underlying business models, delivering significant benefits in terms of both development time and flexibility.

Keywords

Model-driven development Dashboard Business performance management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, K., Guttman, R., Lyman, K., Heath, I. F. F., Kumaran, S., & Nandi, P., et al. (2005). A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutial research. IBM Systems Journal, 44(1), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, S.-K., Lei, H., Wahler, M., Chang, H., Bhaskaran, K., & Frank, J. (2006). A model driven XML transformation framework for business performance management model creation. IJEB, 4, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chowdhary, P., An, L., Jeng, J.-J., & Chen, S.-K. (2005). Enterprise integration and monitoring solution using active shared space. In ICEBE (pp. 295–304).Google Scholar
  4. Czarnecki, K., & Helsen, S. (2003). Classification of model transformation approaches. In OOPSLA workshop on generative techniques in the context of model-driven architecture, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Frakes, W. B., & Kang, K. (2005). Software reuse research: Status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(7), 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, J., Bosworth, A., Layman, A., & Pirahesh, H. (1996). Data cube: A relational aggregation operator generalizing group-by, Cross-Tab, and Sub-Total. ICDE.Google Scholar
  7. Greenfield, J., Short, K., Cook, S., & Kent, S. (2003). Software factories assembling applications with patterns, models, frameworks and tools. In 18th annual ACM OOPSLA.Google Scholar
  8. Jeng, J. J., Buckley, S., Chang, H., Chung, J. Y., Kapoor, S., & Kearney, J., et al. (2002). BAM: An adaptive platform for managing business process solutions. ICECR.Google Scholar
  9. Jeng, J. J., Schiefer, J., & Chang, H. (2003). An agent-based architecture for analyzing business processes of real-time enterprises. In EDOC (pp. 86–97). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  10. Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., & Bast, W. (2003). MDA explained, the model driven architecture: Practice and promise. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Koehler, J., Tirenni, G., & Kumaran, S. (2002). From business process model to consistent implementation: A case for formal verification methods. In EDOC (pp. 96–106). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  12. Kumaran, S. (2004). Model-driven enterprise. In Proceedings of global enterprise architecture integration summit (pp. 166–180).Google Scholar
  13. Kumaran, S., & Nandi, P. (2005). Adaptive business objects: A new component model for business integration. In Proceedings of ICEIS (pp. 48–58).Google Scholar
  14. Marian, A., Abiteboul, S., Cobena, G., & Mignet, L. (2001). Change-centric management of versions in an XML warehouse. In VLDB (pp. 581–590). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  15. McGowan, C., & Bohmer, L. (1993). Model-based business process improvement. ICSE.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, J., & Mukerji, J. (Eds.) (2003). MDA guide version 1.0.1. Object management group. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf.
  17. Mumick, I. S., Quass, D., & Mumick, B. S. (1997). Maintenance of data cubes and summary tables in a warehouse. SIGMOD.Google Scholar
  18. Myers, B., Hudson, S. E., & Pausch, R. (2000). Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. In ACM ToCHI, vol. 7 (pp. 3–28). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  19. Palpanas, T., Sidle, R., Cochrane, R., & Pirahesh, H. (2002). Incremental maintenance for non-distributive aggregate functions. In VLDB (pp. 802–813).Google Scholar
  20. Rugaber, S., & Stirewalt, K. (2004). Model-driven reverse engineering. IEEE Software, 21(4), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sukaviriya, N., Kumaran, S., Nandi, P., & Heath, T. (2005). Integrate model-driven UI with business transformations. MDDAUI.Google Scholar
  22. van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Weske, M. (2003). Business process management: A survey. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: BPM.Google Scholar
  23. Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Mylopoulos, J., Liaskos, S., Lapouchnian, A., & Sampaio do Prado Leite, J. C. (2005). Reverse engineering goal models from legacy code. In ICRE (pp. 363–372). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  24. Zeng, L., Lei, H., Dikun, M., Chang, H., Bhaskaran, K., & Frank, J. (2005). Model-driven business performance management. In ICEBE (pp. 295–304).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Themis Palpanas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pawan Chowdhary
    • 2
  • George Mihaila
    • 3
  • Florian Pinel
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterYorktownUSA
  3. 3.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterHawthorneUSA

Personalised recommendations