Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 91–102 | Cite as

Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT

Abstract

In this paper we address the concept of business architecture. We explain the concept and, based on a case study, discuss its relevance, operation, relationship with strategy and business models, and value for an organization. We also shortly discuss the approach that was taken to create the business architecture; how it was based on and derived from the business strategy. Business architectures contribute to clarify the complexity within an organization and form a useful starting point from which to develop subsequent functional, information, process and application architectures. We clarify these relationships through an architecture linkage model. Having an explicit business architecture also helps to structure the responsibilities within an organization, and to shape outsourcing activities, within the primary process as well as with regard to ICT-support. Business architectures contribute to an adequate ICT-governance in order to orchestrate the resources for critical business activities and how to manage the development and support for e-business efficiently.

Keywords

Business architecture e-business Information systems Shared service centers Architecture linkage model Architecture framework Demand organization Outsourcing Business strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbab F, Bonsangue M, Scholten J-G, Iacob M-E, Jonkers H, Lankhorst M, Proper E, Stam A. State of the art in architecture frameworks and tools. Enschede: Telematica Instituut, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Bernes P, Nemes L. A framework to define a generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 1996;9(3):179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besson I, Green S, Sa J. Linking business processes and information systems provision in a dynamic environment. Information Systems Frontiers 2002;4(3):317–329.Google Scholar
  4. Best Michael H. The New Competition—Institutions of Industrial Restructuring, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Bouwman H, van den Ham E. Business models and e-metrics, a state of the art. In: Priessl B, Bouwman H, Steinfield C, eds, Life after the Dot. Com bust. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler AD. Scale and Scope: the Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Boston, First Harvard University Press 1990.Google Scholar
  7. Chandra C, Kumar S. Enterprise architectural framework for supply chain integration. Industrial Management and Data Systems 2001;101(6):290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Child J, Faulkner D. Strategies of Cooperation—Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Cragg P, King M, Hussin H. IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2002;(11):109–132.Google Scholar
  10. Hammer M, Champy J. Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York, Harper Collins, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Hedman J, Kalling T. The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems 2003;12:49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson J, Venkatraman N. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 1993;32(1):4–16.Google Scholar
  13. IEEE 1471. IEEE recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems, Oct. 9, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. ISO 15704. Industrial automation system-requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Kay, John A. Foundations of Corporate Success—How Business Strategies Add Value. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Koushik S, Joodi P. E-business architecture design issues. IT Pro May/June 2000;38–43.Google Scholar
  17. Mathora Y. Enterprise architecture: An overview. Brint Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Maes R. Reconsidering information management through a generic framework. Amsterdam: PrimaVera working Paper 1999;99–15.Google Scholar
  19. Maes R, Rijsenbrij D, Truijens O, Goedvolk H. Redefining business-IT alignment through a unified framework. White paper, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. McDavid D. A standard for business architecture desciption. IBM Systems Journal (1999);38(1):12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGovern J, Ambler SW, Stevens ME, Linn J, Sharan V, Jo EK. Enterprise architecture, a practical guide. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Miles Matthew K, Hubermann A. Michael qualitative data analysis. A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills (Sage) 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. An e-business model ontology for modelling e-business. In: Loebbecke, C., Wigand, R., Gricar, J., Puchicar, A., and Lenart, G., eds., Ereality: Constructing the Economy. Proceedings 15th Beld Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled Slovenai June 17–19, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Powell, MW. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 1990 12:295–336.Google Scholar
  25. Prahalad CK, Hamel G. The core competencies of the corporation. Harvard Business Review (May–June) 1990;79–91.Google Scholar
  26. Presley A, Sarkis J, Barnett W, Liles D. Engineering the virtual enterprise: An architecture-driven modelling approach. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 2001;13:145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn JB. Intelligent enterprise—a knowledge and service based paradigm. New York, The Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. Rensburg ACJ. AN object-oriented architecture for business transformation. Computers Industrial Engineering 1997;33(1–2):167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson G, Jackson B, Pages M. Principle-based enterprise architecture: Lessons from texaco and star enterprise. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1990;14(4):385–404.Google Scholar
  30. Synnott WR. The information weapon. In: Winning Customers and Markets with Technology, New York: Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
  31. Teo T, Ang J. Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans. International Journal of Information Management 1999;(19):173–185.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson G, Frances J, Levacic R, Mitchell J. Market, Hierarchies and Networks, the Coordination of Social Life. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 1991.Google Scholar
  33. Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K. Managing innovation. Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  34. Timmers P. Electronic commerce strategies and models for business-to-business trading. Chichester: John Willey Publisher, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Treacy M, Wiersema FF. The Discipline of Market Leaders. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
  36. Turban E, McLean E, Wheterbe J. Information technology for management. Transforming Business in the Digital Economy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.Google Scholar
  37. Van Diepen T, Multi-channel distribution in financial services. Impact of Electronic Distribution Channels on the Internal Organisation. TIC, 2000;6:37–60.Google Scholar
  38. Veasey P. Use of enterprise architecture in managing strategic change. Business Proces Management Journal. 2001;7(5):420–436.Google Scholar
  39. Venkatraman N. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review Winter, 1994;73–87.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfenden P, Welch DE. Business architecture: A holistic approach to defining the organization necessary to deliver a strategy. Knowledge and Process Management 2000;7(2):96–106.Google Scholar
  41. Zachman JA. A framework for information system architecture. IBM Systems 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FourPoints IntelligenceMaarssenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Information and Communication Technology,Faculty of Technology, Policy,ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations