The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis
To compare the one-year efficacy of accelerated and standard 5.4 J/cm2 protocols of cross-linking (CXL) in the treatment of progressive keratoconus.
In this systematic review, two members of the research team searched Scopus, Pubmed, ISI, Ovid, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases independently for publications between January 2010 and December 2016. The majority of retrieved studies were not randomized clinical trials (RCT), or the second arm of the RCT was either untreated or customized CXL. The outcomes of interest were uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, maximum keratometry in the central 3 mm, minimum keratometry in the central 3 mm, and corneal thickness in the apex or thinnest point at baseline and 1 year after CXL.
Of the 453 papers found in the preliminary search, 23 papers were included in the final analysis. Analysis of variance of one-year changes showed that longer irradiation times were associated with a greater corneal flattening effect, although there was no difference in terms of improvement in vision or refraction.
In other words, efficacy is comparable among different CXL protocols, so it is recommended to use the standard method in cases where maximum flattening is expected, such as young people and severe cases.
KeywordsStandard cross-linking Accelerated cross-linking Systematic review
No funding was received for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
- 5.Tsatsos M, MacGregor C, Kopsachilis N, Anderson D (2014) Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? Yes. Eye (Basingstoke) 28:784–785Google Scholar
- 9.MacGregor C, Tsatsos M, Hossain P (2014) Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? No. Eye (Basingstoke) 28:786–787Google Scholar
- 18.Bozkurt E, Ozgurhan EB, Akcay BIS, Kurt T, Yildirim Y, Gunaydin ZK, Demirok A (2017) Refractive, topographic, and aberrometric results at 2-year follow-up for accelerated corneal cross-link for progressive keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2017:5714372Google Scholar
- 26.Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Seyedian MA, Hafezi F, Bahrmandy H, Heidarian S, Amanzadeh K, Nikbin H, Fotouhi A, Asgari S (2015) Long-term results of an accelerated corneal cross-linking protocol (18 mW/cm2) for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 160(1164–70):e1Google Scholar
- 41.Bouheraoua N, Jouve L, El Sanharawi M, Sandali O, Temstet C, Loriaut P, Basli E, Borderie V, Laroche L (2014) Optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy following three different protocols of corneal collagen-crosslinking in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:7601–7609CrossRefGoogle Scholar