Analysis of pattern electroretinogram signals of early primary open-angle glaucoma in discrete wavelet transform coefficients domain
- 9 Downloads
To evaluate discrete wavelet transform coefficients and identify descriptors of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) waveforms in order to determine PERG characteristics for optimizing the diagnosis of early primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Pattern electroretinogram was performed in 30 normal eyes and 30 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma according to the ISCEV protocol. The check size was 0.8° and 16°, and the color was black/white in both groups. The results were analyzed in time domain (TD) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT) using the MATLAB software. The mean value, standard deviation, and relative energy of level 6 and 7 detail coefficients (d6, d7) and level 7 approximation coefficients (a7) of Daubechies 4 (db4), Daubechies 8 (db8), Symlet 5 (sym5), Symlet 7 (sym7), and Coiflet 5 (coif5) wavelets were calculated. In all the mentioned wavelets, DWT descriptors were extracted. Signals were reconstructed by inverse DWT. All data obtained by TD and DWT analyses were compared between the two groups.
In both check sizes, a significant attenuation of N95 amplitude was seen in the patient group. The relative energy of a7 of db8 increased significantly in the POAG group in the 0.8° check size. In larger check stimuli, the relative energy of d7 of coif5 decreased significantly and the standard deviation of d7 of sym7 increased markedly in glaucomatous patients (P < 0.05). In small stimuli, N95 descriptor (7N) of db8 had the highest value and showed a significant increase as compared to the POAG group. In the 16° check size, there was no significant difference. A strong correlation was seen between reconstructed signals and originals (r = 0.99).
The DWT can quantify PERG responses more accurately. In agreement with TD and wavelet coefficients domain results, 7N of db8 decomposition can be used as a good indicator for early detection of POAG.
KeywordsPrimary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) Pattern electroretinography Discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) Wavelet analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Schon K, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Sung KR (2014) Prediction of glaucomatous field progression: pointwise analysis. Curr Eye Res 39:705–710Google Scholar
- 5.Bettin P, Di Matteo F (2013) Glaucoma: present challenges and future trends. Ophthalmic Res 50:197–208Google Scholar
- 8.Omoti AE, Okeigbemen VW, Waziri-Erameh JM (2009) Current concepts in the diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma. West Afr J Med 28(3):141–147Google Scholar
- 15.Leonard KC, Hutnik CML (2010) Using electroretinography for glaucoma diagnosis. In: Schacknow PN, Samples JR (eds) The glaucoma book: a practical, evidence-based approach to patient care, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–267Google Scholar
- 17.Parisi V, Manni G, Centofanti M, Gandofi SA, Ozli D, Bucci M (2001) Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 108:905–912Google Scholar
- 19.Fisher AC, Hagan RP, Brown MC (2007) Automatic positioning of cursors in the transient pattern electroretinogram (PERG) with very poor SNR using an expert system. Doc Ophthalmol 115:61–68Google Scholar
- 20.Bach M, Brigell MG, Holder GE, Meigen T, Hawlina M, Johnson MA, Viswanathan S, McCulloch DL (2013) ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol 126:1–7Google Scholar
- 25.Akay M (1998) Time frequency and wavelets in biomedical signal processing. IEEE Press series in Biomedical Engineering, First edn. Wiley, New York, pp 230–257Google Scholar
- 26.Penkala K (2010) Continuous wavelet transformation of pattern electroretinogram (PERG)-a tool improving the test accuracy. In: Bamidis P, Pallikarakis N (eds) XII Mediterranean conference on medical and biological engineering and computing 2010. Springer, Berlin, pp 196–199Google Scholar
- 29.Gauvin M, Little JM, Lina JM, Lachapelle P (2015) Functional decomposition of the human ERG based on the discrete wavelet transform. J Vis 15(16):1–22Google Scholar
- 31.Varadharajan S, Fitzgerald K, Lakshminarayanan V (2000) Wavelet analysis of ERG of patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. In: Vision science and its application, OSA Technical Digest, pp 65–68Google Scholar
- 32.Miguel Jimenez JM, Blanco R, Boquete L, Rodriguez Ascariz JM, De la Villa Polo P (2008) Multifocal electroretinography. Glaucoma diagnosis by means of the wavelet transform. In: Electrical and computer engineering, CCEC, Canadian conference, pp 867–870Google Scholar
- 33.Varadharajan S, Fitzgerald K, Lakshminarayanan V (2007) A novel method for separating the components of the clinical electroretinogram. J Mod Opt 54(9):1263–1280Google Scholar
- 34.Miguel-Jimenez JM, Boquete L, Ortega S, Rodriguez-Ascariz JM, Blanco R (2010) Glaucoma detection by wavelet-based analysis of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram. Med Eng Phys 32:617–622Google Scholar
- 38.Mallat SG (2009) A wavelet tour of signal processing the sparse way, 3rd edn. Academic Press, HoustonGoogle Scholar
- 41.Graham SL, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, Swindale NV, Hnik P, Mikelberg FS, Douglas GR (1996) Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:2651–2662Google Scholar
- 42.Jafarzadehpour E, Radinmehr F, Pakravan M, Mirzajani A, Yazdani SH (2013) Pattern electroretinography in glaucoma suspects and early primary open angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 8(3):199–206Google Scholar
- 43.Demir ST, Oba ME, Erdogan ET, Odabasi M, Dirim AB, Demir M, Can E, Kara O, Sendül (2015) Comparison of pattern electroretinography and optical coherence tomography parameters in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Turk J Ophthalmol 45:229–234Google Scholar
- 44.Ventura LM, Sorokac N, Santos RDL, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V (2006) The relationship between retinal ganglion cell function and retinal nerve fiber thickness in early glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(9):3904–39011Google Scholar
- 46.Sunga RN, Enoch JM (1970) A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties. 3. Clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol 70:244–272Google Scholar
- 48.Mueller BH, Stankowska DL, Krishnamoorthy PR (2011) Neuroprotection in glaucoma. In: RumeltSh (ed) Glaucoma—basic and clinical concepts. INTECH Open Access PublisherGoogle Scholar
- 50.Van der Tweel LH, Estévez O (2006) Analytical techniques. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 439–459Google Scholar