Advertisement

Genetic features of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with eye infections referred to Farabi Hospital, Tehran, Iran

  • Farahnoosh Doustdar
  • Fatemeh Karimi
  • Zohreh Abedinyfar
  • Fahimeh Asadi Amoli
  • Hossein Goudarzi
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Pseudomonas is the most common cause of microbial keratitis especially in people who use contact lens. The virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in different eye infections is associated with different virulence factors .

Methods

In this study, 54 P. aeruginosa isolates including 39 isolates from keratitis and 15 isolates from conjunctivitis were evaluated for their ability to form biofilm, production of protease, elastase, alkaline protease and their antibiotic-resistant patterns. The distribution of the exoS and exoU genes in the test strains were determined using PCR assays.

Results

Most of the eye infections (90.74%) were seen in people who used contact lenses, and in most of patients (72.22%), the infection was presented as keratitis. None of the isolates were resistant to a single antibiotic as tested. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was detected in two isolates (3.5%) which were resistant to more than one category of antibiotics. The exoU+/exoS+ isolates were in majority although in total, compared to exoS, there were more exoU in a greater number of samples. Most of the strains produce elastase but among all of ocular isolates, only 5.8% of the strains showed alkaline protease activity. Most of the ocular isolates were not capable of producing biofilm.

Conclusions

In our study, a high prevalence of virulence factors was observed in P. aeruginosa isolates from contact lens wearer with keratitis. As the P. aeruginosa isolates from different infection origins and different geographic region may have different virulence factors, having a better perception of these differences could help to improve development of clinical instructions for the control of keratitis.

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Eye infections Virulence factors Exotoxins Contact lens 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest and have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Bandara MB, Zhu H, Sankaridurg PR et al (2006) Salicylic acid reduces the production of several potential virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with microbial keratitis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4453–4460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazlett L, Suvas S, McClellan S et al (2016) Challenges of corneal infections. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 11:285–297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choy MH, Stapleton F, Willcox MD et al (2008) Comparison of virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from contact lens-and non-contact lens-related keratitis. J Med Microbiol 57:1539–1546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffman JJ, Pelosini L (2016) What happens when one leaves soft contact lenses in for three weeks? A case of bilateral, severe pseudomonas keratitis from contact lenses purchased over the internet. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 39:318–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kautto L, Nguyen-Khuong T, Everest-Dass A et al (2016) Glycan involvement in the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tears. Exp Eye Res 145:278–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vaez H, Faghri J, Esfahani BN et al (2015) Antibiotic resistance patterns and genetic diversity in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients of a referral hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol 8:e20130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yousefi-Avarvand A, Khashei R, Ebrahim-Saraie HS et al (2015) The frequency of exotoxin A and exoenzymes S and U genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Shiraz, Iran. Int J Mol Cell Med 4:167PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM (2013) Why does the healthy cornea resist Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection? Am J Ophthalmol 155(961–970):e2Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Streeter K, Katouli M (2016) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a review of their pathogenesis and prevalence in clinical settings and the environment. Infect Epidemiol Med 2:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toska J, Sun Y, Carbonell DA et al (2014) Diversity of virulence phenotypes among type III secretion negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. PLoS ONE 9:e86829CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oka N, Suzuki T, Ishikawa E et al (2015) Relationship of virulence factors and clinical features in keratitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors in P. aeruginosa keratitis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:6892–6898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lakhundi S, Siddiqui R, Khan NA (2017) Pathogenesis of microbial keratitis. Microb Pathog 104:97–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee EJ, Cowell BA, Evans DJ et al (2003) Contribution of ExsA–regulated factors to corneal infection by cytotoxic and invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine scarification model. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3892–3898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varga JJ, Barbier M, Mulet X et al (2015) Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic bronchiectasis isolate reveal differences from cystic fibrosis and laboratory strains. BMC Genom 16:883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu H, Conibear TC, Bandara R et al (2006) Type III secretion system–associated toxins, proteases, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with keratitis. Curr Eye Res 31:297–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tam C, Lewis S, Li W et al (2007) Mutation of the phospholipase catalytic domain of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxin ExoU abolishes colonization promoting activity and reduces corneal disease severity. Exp Eye Res 85:799–805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ledbetter EC, Mun JJ, Kowbel D et al (2009) Pathogenic phenotype and genotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from spontaneous canine ocular infections. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wayne P (2007) Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Perform Stand Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test vol 17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinna A, Usai D, Sechi LA et al (2008) Detection of virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from contact lens-associated corneal ulcers. Cornea 27:320–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol 28:449–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamaguchi S, Suzuki T, Kobayashi T et al (2014) Genotypic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from ocular infection. J Infect Chemother 20:407–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salter SJ (2015) Keeping an eye on P. aeruginosa. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galloway NR, Amoaku WM, Galloway PH et al (2016) Common diseases of the conjunctiva and cornea, common eye diseases and their management. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–63Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hedayati H, Ghaderpanah M, Rasoulinejad SA et al (2015) Clinical presentation and antibiotic susceptibility of contact lens associated microbial keratitis. J Pathog 2015:152767Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Priya JL, Prajna L, Mohankumar V (2015) Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from post-cataract endophthalmitis patients. Microb Pathog 78:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ajayi T, Allmond LR, Sawa T et al (2003) Single-nucleotide-polymorphism mapping of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion toxins for development of a diagnostic multiplex PCR system. J Clin Microbiol 41:3526–3531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stapleton F, Carnt N (2012) Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Eye 26:185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jain N, Bhosale P, Tale V (2016) Biofilm formation on contact lenses by bacterial pathogens. J Pharm Res 10:50–53Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Winstanley C, Kaye SB, Neal TJ et al (2005) Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with ulcerative keratitis. J Med Microbiol 54:519–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shen EP, Hsieh Y-T, Chu H-S et al (2015) Correlation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotype with antibiotic susceptibility and clinical features of induced central keratitis association of T3SS with pseudomonal keratitis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lomholt JA, Poulsen K, Kilian M (2001) Epidemic population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for a clone that is pathogenic to the eye and that has a distinct combination of virulence factors. Infect Immun 69:6284–6295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Karthikeyan RS, Priya JL, Leal SM Jr et al (2013) Host response and bacterial virulence factor expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae corneal ulcers. PLoS ONE 8:e64867CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bejestani FB, Hakemi-Vala M, Momtaheni R et al (2015) The frequency of imp and vim genes among pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from children’s medical center of tehran. Arch Clin Infect Dis 10:e60116Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wong-Beringer A, Wiener-Kronish J, Lynch S et al (2008) Comparison of type III secretion system virulence among fluoroquinolone-susceptible and- resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:330–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bispo PJ, Haas W, Gilmore MS (2015) Biofilms in infections of the eye. Pathogens 4:111–136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Caballero A, Thibodeaux B, Marquart M et al (2004) Pseudomonas keratitis: protease IV gene conservation, distribution, and production relative to virulence and other Pseudomonas proteases. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fukuda K, Ishida W, Fukushima A et al (2017) Corneal fibroblasts as sentinel cells and local immune modulators in infectious keratitis. Int J Mol Sci 18:1831CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pillar C, Hazlett L, Hobden J (2000) Alkaline protease-deficient mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are virulent in the eye. Curr Eye Res 21:730–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stewart RM, Wiehlmann L, Ashelford KE et al (2011) Genetic characterization indicates that a specific subpopulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with keratitis infections. J Clin Microbiol 49:993–1003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farahnoosh Doustdar
    • 1
  • Fatemeh Karimi
    • 2
  • Zohreh Abedinyfar
    • 1
  • Fahimeh Asadi Amoli
    • 3
  • Hossein Goudarzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceAzarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations