Corneal densitometry after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus
- 151 Downloads
To analyze changes in corneal densitometry 3 months after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) measured with Scheimpflug tomography.
In this study we reviewed charts and anterior segment data of patients who had undergone accelerated pulsed epithelium-off CXL (30 mW/cm2 for 4 min, 8 min total radiation time) for treatment of progressive keratoconus in the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Visual, topographic, pachymetric and densitometric data were extracted before surgery and at the 3-month follow-up. Corneal densitometry measurements from different corneal layers and zones obtained using Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus).
The study investigated 12 eyes of 12 patients. The anterior (120 μm) stromal layer within the 0.0 to 2.0 mm and 2.0 to 6.0 mm concentric zones showed a significant elevation of mean densitometry 3 months post-surgery (P = 0.045; P = 0.015) compared to baseline. A mean stromal demarcation line was apparent at a depth of 203.00 μm ± 13.53 (SD). After accelerated CXL, no change in mean corrected distance visual acuity (LogMAR) was observed but a thinning of the cornea measured by a significant reduction in central pachymetry (μm).
Accelerated CXL results in an increase in corneal densitometry, particularly in the anterior stromal layer within the two central concentric zones (0.0 to 2.0 mm and 2.0 to 6.0 mm) of the cornea at 3 months postoperatively. The changes in corneal densitometry of the anterior stromal layer did not correlate with postoperative visual acuity or central pachymetry.
KeywordsCorneal collagen cross-linking Densitometry Scheimpflug tomography Keratoconus
Balanced salt solution
Corrected distance visual acuity
Corneal collagen cross-linking
Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution
Optical coherence tomography
Uncorrected distance visual acuity
Myriam Böhm: none; Mehdi Shajari: Oculus; Matthias Remy: Avedro Inc.: Travel has been funded; Thomas Kohnen receives grant support from Hoya, J&J Vision (Abbott), Novartis (Alcon), Oculentis, Oculus, Schwind, and Zeiss; and is a consultant to Geuder, J&J Vision (Abbott), Novartis (Alcon), Oculus, Santen, Schwind, STAAR, TearLab, Thea Pharma, Thieme Compliance, Ziemer, and Zeiss.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Myriam Böhm and Mehdi Shajari declare that they have no conflict of interest. Matthias Remy has received a travel honorarium from Avedro (Waltham, MA 02451, USA).
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
No informed consent was obtained from patients since this was a retrospective study and data were anonymized. This is in accordance with the ethical vote obtained from the local ethics committee.
- 1.Sykakis E, Karim R, Evans JR, Bunce C, Amissah-Arthur KN, Patwary S, McDonnell PJ, Hamada S (2015) Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (3):Cd010621. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010621.pub2
- 7.Kymionis GD, Tsoulnaras KI, Grentzelos MA, Liakopoulos DA, Tsakalis NG, Blazaki SV, Paraskevopoulos TA, Tsilimbaris MK (2014) Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line depth following standard and a modified-accelerated collagen cross-linking protocol. Am J Ophthalmol 158(4):671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Woo JH, Iyer JV, Lim L, Hla MH, Mehta JS, Chan CM, Tan DT (2017) Conventional versus accelerated collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: a comparison of visual, refractive, topographic and biomechanical outcomes. Open Ophthalmol J 11:262–272. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Asri D, Touboul D, Fournie P, Malet F, Garra C, Gallois A, Malecaze F, Colin J (2011) Corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: multicenter results from the French national reference center for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(12):2137–2143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mazzotta C, Balestrazzi A, Baiocchi S, Traversi C, Caporossi A (2007) Stromal haze after combined riboflavin-UVA corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: in vivo confocal microscopic evaluation. Clinical Exp Ophthalmol 35(6):580–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01536.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kohnen T, Neuhann T, Knorz MC (2014) Evaluation and quality assurance of refractive surgical interventions by the German Ophthalmology Society and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (status 2014). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 231(6):642–650. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1368481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Accelerated cross-linking with Pulsed illumination (2013). Clinical Update & Research News Volume 3(1): 1–4Google Scholar
- 26.Wilson SE, Kim WJ (1998) Keratocyte apoptosis: implications on corneal wound healing, tissue organization, and disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(2):220–226Google Scholar
- 27.Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, Epstein D (2009) Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 116(3):369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Steven P, Hovakimyan M, Guthoff RF, Huttmann G, Stachs O (2010) Imaging corneal crosslinking by autofluorescence 2-photon microscopy, second harmonic generation, and fluorescence lifetime measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(12):2150–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Marshall J HP, Muller D (2013) Corneal collagen cross-linking; past, present, future [ebook]Google Scholar
- 42.Seiler T, Hafezi F (2006) Corneal cross-linking-induced stromal demarcation line. Cornea 25(9):1057–1059. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000225720.38748.58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Bottos KM, Dreyfuss JL, Regatieri CV, Lima-Filho AA, Schor P, Nader HB, Chamon W (2008) Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of porcine corneas following collagen cross-linking treatment with riboflavin and ultraviolet A. J Refract Surg 24(7):S715–719Google Scholar
- 45.Dohlman CH, Hedbys BO, Mishima S (1962) The swelling pressure of the corneal stroma. Investig Ophthalmol 1:158–162Google Scholar
- 47.Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi O, Bovone C, Sparano MC, Balestrazzi A, Caporossi A (2008) Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo: early and late modifications. Am J Ophthalmol 146(4):527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi O, Buccoliero D, Casprini F, Caporossi A, Balestrazzi A (2008) Confocal microscopy identification of keratoconus associated with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(2):318–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Koc M, Uzel MM, Tekin K, Kosekahya P, Ozulken K, Yilmazbas P (2016) Effect of preoperative factors on visual acuity, corneal flattening, and corneal haze after accelerated corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(10):1483–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar