Advertisement

Stromal Patch with fibrin glue as a novel surgical technique to seal peripheral Descemet’s membrane perforations in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

  • Reza Ghaffari
  • Hamed Ghassemi
  • Golshan LatifiEmail author
  • Mahmood Jabbarvand
  • Alireza Zamzam
  • Hassan Hashemi
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article was to introduce a novel surgical technique for the management of peripheral Descemet’s membrane perforation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

Methods

First, a thin stromal patch was prepared either from the anterior stromal lamella cut during DALK or from the anterior stroma of a Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty button. The stromal patch was secured in a stromal pocket dissected deep in the trephination edge along the perforation site. Fibrin glue was applied to the stromal patch. Finally, the graft was sutured to the recipient bed.

Results

We used this technique in 3 cases with peripheral DM perforations during DALK. The first case was a persistent postoperative double anterior chamber who developed Urrets-Zavalia syndrome after air injection in an attempt to seal the perforation. In the second case, this technique was applied to seal an intraoperative DM perforation, without which the procedure would have been converted to penetrating keratoplasty. The third case had a persistent postoperative double chamber despite multiple air injections and fibrin glue application. The technique was effective in the management of all DM perforations with a resolution of double anterior chamber.

Conclusion

This technique is safe and effective as an intraoperative method or a postoperative measure to seal peripheral DM perforations. We recommend this technique for repairing peripherally located DM perforations during DALK not amenable to simple measures like air injection or fibrin glue application.

Keywords

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty Double anterior chamber Fibrin glue Stromal patch 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mrs. Baharak Salehi for her contribution to designing the schematic illustration of the technique.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were approved by the ethical committee of Farabi Eye hospital and were in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10792_2018_1065_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (24.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 25121 kb)
10792_2018_1065_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (10.9 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 11206 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS et al (2011) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 118:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donnenfeld E (2007) Impact of the Descemet membrane perforation on surgical outcomes after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Evidence-Based Ophthalmology. 8:224–225Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anwar HM, El-Danasoury A, Hashem AN (2012) The use of fibrin glue to seal descemet membrane microperforations occurring during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 31:1193–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Por YM, Tan YL, Mehta JS et al (2009) Intracameral fibrin tissue sealant as an adjunct in tectonic lamellar keratoplasty for large corneal perforations. Cornea 28:451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Den S, Shimmura S, Tsubota K et al (2007) Impact of the descemet membrane perforation on surgical outcomes after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 143:750–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maurino V, Allan BD, Stevens JD et al (2002) Fixed dilated pupil (Urrets-Zavalia syndrome) after air/gas injection after deep lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 133:266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landry H, Aminian A, Hoffart L et al (2011) Corneal endothelial toxicity of air and SF6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:2279–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee DA, Wilson MR, Yoshizumi MO et al (1991) The ocular effects of gases when injected into the anterior chamber of rabbit eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 109:571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsubota K, Laing RA, Chiba K et al (1987) Effects of air and irrigating solutions on the corneal endothelium. Cornea 7:115–121Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang OS, Htoon HM, Chan AM, Tan D, Mehta JS (2018) Incidence and outcomes of intraoperative Descemet membrane perforations during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 199:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leccisotti A (2007) Descemet’s membrane perforation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: prognosis. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(5):825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steger B, Romano V, Palme C, Kaye SB (2016) Intraoperative management of macroperforations of Descemet’s membrane in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty intraoperative Behandlung von Makroperforationen der Descemet-Membran bei tiefer anteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik. Spektrum der Augenheilkunde. 30(4–5):175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panda A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Bansal R, Bhartiya S (2009) Fibrin glue in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol 57(5):371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Farabi Eye HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Noor Eye Research CenterNoor Eye HospitalTehranIran

Personalised recommendations