Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 2141–2147 | Cite as

Clinical evaluation of aqueous outflow system in vivo and correlation with intraocular pressure before and after non-penetrating glaucoma surgery

  • Renata Vaiciuliene
  • Norbert Körber
  • Vytautas Jasinskas
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the aqueous outflow system through channelography with fluorescein during non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (canaloplasty or phacocanaloplasty) and find correlations with preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods

Thirty-six patients (40 eyes) who had channelography while undergoing non-penetrating glaucoma surgery were included in this prospective study. Several parameters assessed during the channelography included: diffuse and superficial scleral staining, the number of visible superficial connections to collectors, trabecular permeability and number of micro-ruptures of the trabecular meshwork. IOP, the best-corrected visual acuity, the number of glaucoma medications was recorded at 1 day, 7 days, 3 months and 6 months after the operation.

Results

The change in IOP at 6 months from baseline significantly correlated with the number of visible superficial connections to collectors (r = 0.4, p = 0.021). Eyes with canaloplasty showed a mean baseline IOP of 19.4 (4.9) mmHg and mean glaucoma medication usage of 2.9 (1.0), which decreased to 13.2 (3.1) mmHg with 0.3 (0.8) medications, respectively, at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Eyes with phacocanaloplasty surgery showed a mean baseline IOP of 28.2 (9.6) mmHg with 2.6 (0.9) mean drugs, which decreased to IOP of 12.8 (3.4) mmHg with 0.5 (0.8) medications at 6 months (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A larger number of defined visible superficial connections to collectors after injection of fluorescein into SC is related to a more pronounced IOP decrease after non-penetrating glaucoma surgery.

Keywords

Canaloplasty Channelography Schlemm’s canal 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Grieshaber MC (2012) Ab externo Schlemm’s canal surgery: viscocanalostomy and canaloplasty. Dev Ophthalmol 50:109–124CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baikstiene Daiva Paulaviciute, Vaiciuliene Renata, Jasinskas Vytautas, Januleviciene Ingrida (2016) Evaluation of outflow structures in vivo after the phacocanaloplasty. J Ophthalmol. doi: 10.1155/2016/4519846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, Wen W, Chen J, Yu X et al (2013) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic assessment of Schlemm’s canal in Chinese subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 120(4):709–715CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irshad FA, Mayfield MS, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS (2010) Variation in Schlemm’s canal diameter and location by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 117(5):916–920CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Clinical evaluation of the aqueous outflow system in primary open-angle glaucoma for canaloplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(3):1498–1504CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2009) Channelography: imaging of the aqueous outflow pathway with flexible microcatheter and fluorescein in canaloplasty. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 226(4):245–248CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grieshaber MC (2015) Channelography and mechanism of action in canaloplasty. Ophthalmologe 112(4):319–324CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smit BA, Johnstone MA (2002) Effects of viscoelastic injection into Schlemm’s canal in primate and human eyes: potential relevance to viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmology 109(4):786–792CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson DH, Johnson M (2002) Glaucoma surgery and aqueous outflow: how does nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery work? Arch Ophthalmol 120(1):67–70CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shingleton B, Tetz M, Körber N (2008) Circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal (canaloplasty) with temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract; one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:433–440CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bull H, von Wolff K, Körber N, Tetz M (2011) Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1537–1545CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wishart MS, Shergill T, Porooshani H (2002) Viscocanalostomy and phacoviscocanalostomy: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(5):745–751CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton BJ, Samuelson TW (2011) Canaloplasty: three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:682–690CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peckar CO, Körber K (2008) Canaloplasty for open angle glaucoma: a three years critical evaluation and comparison with viscocanalostomy. Spektrum Augenheilkunde. doi: 10.1007/s00717-008-0272-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shrivastava A, Singh K (2010) The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21(2):118–122CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iancu R, Corbu C (2014) Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in patients with uncontrolled primary open angle glaucoma. J Med Life 7:11–16PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S, Buckman G, Hod Y, Geyer O (2005) Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:479–483CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jamil AZ, Iqbal K, Ur Rahman F, Mirza KA (2011) Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 21:347–350PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shingleton BJ, Pasternack JJ, Hung JW, O’Donoghue MW (2006) Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. J Glaucoma 15:494–498CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levkovitch-Verbin H, Habot-Wilner Z, Burla N, Melamed S, Goldenfeld M, Bar-Sela SM, Sachs D (2008) Intraocular pressure elevation within the first 24 hours after cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma or exfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology 115(1):104–108CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin YP, Dg Zurakowski, Ayyalia RS (2007) Surgical outcomes of traditional limbal-based versus fornix-based trabeculectomy with corneal valve. Ohthalmic Surg Laser Imaging 38:471–477Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fontana H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Lumba J, Ralli M, Caprioli J (2006) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C: outcomes and risk factors for failure in phakic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113:930–936CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ayyala RS, Chaudhry AL, Okogbaa CB, Zurakowski D (2011) Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 months’ follow-up. Ophthalmology 118:2427–2433CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renata Vaiciuliene
    • 1
  • Norbert Körber
    • 2
    • 3
  • Vytautas Jasinskas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyLithuanian University of Health SciencesKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.AugencentrumCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations