Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 2077–2087 | Cite as

Effect of iris registration on outcomes of FEMTOLASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism

  • Mohammad Ghoreishi
  • Zahra Naderi Beni
  • Afsaneh Naderi Beni
  • Farzan Kianersi
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes after FEMTOLASIK with and without iris registration.

Methods

In this randomized, prospective, comparative, contralateral eye study, 118 eyes of 59 patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism underwent LASIK using the Femto LDV femtosecond laser (160 µm) and the MEL80 with or without iris registration. For each patient, iris registration FEMTOLASIK was performed on one eye and non-iris registration FEMTOLASIK was performed on the other eye, assigned at random. Patients were evaluated before and 12 months. Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated.

Results

At 12 months, the mean UDVA was 0.002 ± 0.07 logMAR (20/19) in iris registration eyes and 0.00 ± 0.06 logMAR (20/24) in non-iris registration eyes (P = 0.9). 61% of iris registration eyes and 71.2% of non-iris registration eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = 0.31); 98.3% of eyes with the iris registration FEMTOLASIK and 94.9% with the non-iris registration FEMTOLASIK were within ±0.50 D from emmetropia (P = 0.71). No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative contrast sensitivity between groups at 3, 6, 12, or 18 cycles/degree (P > 0.05). There was significant increase in total HOA root mean square in two groups. The mean error magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism 12 months postoperatively was −0.33 in iris registration eyes and −0.24 in the non-iris registration eyes (P = 0.36).

Conclusions

FEMTOLASIK with and without iris registration provides similar results in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients.

Keywords

FEMTOLASIK Myopia Iris registration Outcomes 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors do not have any financial interest in any products mentioned in this article.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kermani O (2004) Alignment in customized laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 20:S651–S658PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim H, Joo C-K (2008) Ocular cyclotorsion according to body position and flap creation before laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:557–561CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swami AU, Steinert RF, Osborne WE, White AA (2002) Rotational malposition during laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 133:561–562CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arba-Mosquera S, Merayo-Lloves J, de Ortueta D (2008) Clinical effects of pure cyclotorsional errors during refractive surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4828–4836CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang L, Koch DD (2008) Residual higher-order aberrations caused by clinically measured cyclotorsional misalignment or decentration during wavefront-guided excimer laser corneal ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:2057–2062CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hori-Komai Y, Sakai C, Toda I, Ito M, Yamamoto T, Tsubota K (2007) Detection of cyclotorsional rotation during excimer laser ablation in LASIK. J Refract Surg 23:911–915PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chernyak DA (2004) Cyclotorsional eye motion occurring between wavefront measurement and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:633–638CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swami AU, Steinert RF, Osborne WE, White AA (2002) Rotational malposition during laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 133:561–562CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu F, Yang Y, Dougherty PJ (2009) Contralateral comparison of wavefront-guided LASIK surgery with iris recognition versus without iris recognition using the MEL80 Excimer laser system. Clin Exp Optom 92(3):320–327CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghosh S, Couper TA, Lamoureux E, Jhanji V, Taylor HR, Vajpayee RB (2008) Evaluation of iris recognition system for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(2):215–221CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moshirfar M, Chen MC, Espandar L, Meyer JJ, Christensen D, Christiansen SM, Dave SB, Bedke B, Kurz C (2009) Effect of iris registration on outcomes of LASIK for myopia with the VISX CustomVue platform. J Refract Surg 25(6):493–502PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalifa M, El-Kateb M, Shaheen MS (2009) Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(3):433–437CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prakash G, Agarwal A, Ashok Kumar D, Jacob S, Agarwal A (2011) Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism without iris registration, with iris registration, and with iris registration-assisted dynamic rotational eye tracking. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(3):574–581CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang J, Zhou YH, Li R, Tian L (2013) Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration: results at 1 year. Int J Ophthalmol 6(4):498–504PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Ghoreishi
    • 1
  • Zahra Naderi Beni
    • 2
  • Afsaneh Naderi Beni
    • 3
  • Farzan Kianersi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ophthalmologyIsfahan University of Medical ScienceIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of radiation oncologyIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  3. 3.Department of ophthalmologyShahrekord University of Medical SciencesShahrekordIran

Personalised recommendations