Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1233–1239 | Cite as

Comparison of efficacy of three surgical methods of conjunctival autograft fixation in the treatment of pterygium

  • Alok Sati
  • Sandeep ShankarEmail author
  • Ashok Jha
  • Deepak Kalra
  • Sanjay Mishra
  • V. S. Gurunadh
Original Paper

Abstract

Our aim primarily was to compare the recurrence rate with three techniques of conjunctival fixation (suture versus fibrin glue versus autologous in situ blood coagulum) over bare sclera following pterygium excision. Ninety eyes of 90 patients with primary pterygium were randomly divided into three groups: group I (30 eyes) underwent autografting and fixation with 8-0 vicryl sutures, group II (30 eyes) with fibrin glue and group III (30 eyes) with autologous in situ blood coagulum. The patients were reviewed on 2nd day, weeks 1 and 4, and at every 3 months till 12 months after surgery. Rate of recurrence was similar (p = 0.585) across the three groups. Time taken for surgery for Group 1 was more as compared to group 2 (p < 0.001) and group 3 (p < 0.001). Also, group 2 cases took significantly more time as compared to group 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative patient discomfort (foreign body sensation, epiphora, pain and irritation) was more in suture-assisted autografting as compared to the other two groups. However, at some points along the time line, patient discomfort was significantly more in group III as compared to group II. Complications like graft retraction, graft displacement and cyst formation were seen in a few patients but were not statistically significant across the three groups. All three techniques were found to be useful methods and were associated with similar rate of recurrence.

Keywords

Pterygium Suture assisted autografting Fibrin glue assisted autografting Autologous insitu blood coagulum assisted autografting 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaros PA, Deluise VP (1988) Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol 33:41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viani GA, Fonseca EC, De Fendi LI et al (2012) Conjunctival autograft alone or combined with adjuvant beta-radiation? A randomized clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, Fromer S et al (2003) Subconjunctival mitomycin C as adjunctive therapy before pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 110:1012–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubinfeld RS, Pfister RR, Stein RM et al (1992) Serious complications of topical mitomycin-C after pterygium surgery. Ophthalmology 99:1647–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu CM, Liang WL, Huang YY et al (2011) Comparison of clinical efficacy of three surgical methods in the treatment of pterygium. Eye Sci 26:193–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME (1985) Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 92:1461–1470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen PP, Ariyasu RG, Kaza V et al (1995) A randomized trial comparing mitomycin C and conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium. Am J Ophthalmol 120:151–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G et al (1997) Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 104:974–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al Fayez MF (2002) Limbal versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 109:1752–1755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marticorena J, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Tourino R et al (2006) Pterygium surgery; conjunctival autograft using fibrin adhesive. Cornea 25:34–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uy HS, Reyes JMG, Flores JDG et al (2005) Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 112:667–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bahar I, Weinberger D, Dan G et al (2006) Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea 25:1168–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED (2005) The cut-and-paste method for primary pterygium surgery: long-term follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:298–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wit D, Athanasiadis I, Sharma A et al (2010) Sutureless and glue free conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a case series. Eye 24:1474–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malik KPS, Goel R, Gupta A et al (2012) Efficacy of sutureless and glue free limbal conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol 24:230–235Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh PK, Singh S, Vyas C, Singh M (2013) Conjunctival Autografting without Fibrin Glue or Sutures for Pterygium Surgery. Cornea 32:104–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan DT, Chee SP, Dear KB, Lim AS (1997) Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1235–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim-Bon-Siong R, Valluri S, Gordon M et al (1998) Efficacy and safety of the ProTek (Vifilcon A) therapeutic soft contact lens after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 125:169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cagatay HH, Gokce G, Ekinci M et al (2014) Long-term comparison of fibrin tissue glue and vicryl suture in conjunctival autografting for pterygium surgery. Postgrad Med 126:97–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP (2009) Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:584–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pan HW, Zhong JX, Jing CX (2011) Comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 118:1049–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA et al (2008) Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1206–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choudhury S, Dutta J, Mukhopadhyay S et al (2014) Comparison of autologous in situ blood coagulum versus sutures for conjunctival autografting after pterygium excision. Int Ophthalmol 34:41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cha DM, Kim KH, Hyuk Jin Choi HJ et al (2012) A Comparative study of the effect of fibrin glue versussutures on clinical outcome in patients undergoing pterygium excision and conjunctival autografts. Korean J Ophthalmol 26:407–413PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alok Sati
    • 1
  • Sandeep Shankar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashok Jha
    • 1
  • Deepak Kalra
    • 1
  • Sanjay Mishra
    • 2
  • V. S. Gurunadh
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept of OphthalmologyCommand Hospital (EC)KolkataIndia
  2. 2.Dept of OphthalmologyArmy Hospital (R&R)New DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Dept of OphthalmologyArmed Forces Medical CollegePuneIndia

Personalised recommendations