International Ophthalmology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 71–74 | Cite as

Torpedo maculopathy: a morphofunctional evaluation

  • Elisabetta Pilotto
  • Maria Elisabetta Zannin
  • Enrica Convento
  • Marta Cortese
  • Edoardo Midena
Case Report


To describe the optical coherence tomography (OCT), the standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) and near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF), and the microperimetric findings in a child with a unique unilateral lesion of the temporal macula previously called torpedo maculopathy. A 4-year-old female with torpedo maculopathy was evaluated with spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), standard SW-FAF (excitation 488 nm, emission >500 nm) and NIR-FAF (excitation 787 nm, emission >800 nm). Microperimetry was performed to assess retinal sensitivity changes correlated to the macular lesion. SD-OCT showed an abnormally thin retinal pigment epithelium signal and an increased signal transmission in the choroid corresponding to the torpedo lesion with no neuroretinal changes. SW-FAF resulted in normal fluorescence of the lesion except for a small hyperfluorescent area at the tail level. NIR-FAF showed hypofluorescence corresponding to the lesion. Macular microperimetry showed reduced retinal sensitivity along the pigmented margins of the lesion with normal values over the lesion. The patient was re-evaluated 12 months later and no change was documented with all diagnostic techniques. This case supports a congenital defect of retinal pigment epithelium. The absence of both functional changes at lesion level and neuroretinal changes at OCT may depend on the very early detection of this lesion.


Torpedo maculopathy Microperimetry Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography Standard short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence Near-infrared fundus autofluorescence 


  1. 1.
    Daily MD (1992) Torpedo maculopathy of paramacular spot syndrome. In: New dimensions in retina symposium (conference program), ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golchet PR, Jampol LM, Mathura JR Jr, Daily MJ (2010) Torpedo maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 94:302–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbazetto IA, Maris PJ Jr, Greenstein VC (2008) Solitary albinotic spot of the retinal pigment epithelium: a functional and imaging study. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 225(4):295–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delori FC, Dorey CK, Staurenghi G et al (1995) In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:718–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delori FC, Goger DG, Dorey CK (2001) Age-related accumulation and spatial distribution of lipofuscin in RPE of normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1855–1866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holz FG, Bindewald-Wittich A, Fleckenstein M et al (2007) Progression of geographic atrophy and impact of fundus autofluorescence patterns in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 143:463–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keilhauer CN, Delori FC (2006) Near-infrared autofluorescence imaging of the fundus: visualization of ocular melanin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:3556–3564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pilotto E, Vujosevic S, Melis R, Convento E, Sportiello P, Alemany-Rubio E, Segalina S, Midena E (2011) Short wavelength fundus autofluorescence versus near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, with microperimetric correspondence, in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 95(8):1140–4Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Midena E, Vujosevic S, Convento E, Manfrè A, Cavarzeran F, Pilotto E (2007) Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 91:499–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roseman RL, Gass JD (1992) Solitary hypopigmented nevus of the retinal pigment epithelium in the macula. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1358e9Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shields CL, Guzman JM, Shapiro MJ, Fogel LE, Shields JA (2010) Torpedo maculopathy at the site of the fetal “bulge”. Arch Ophthalmol 128:499–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabetta Pilotto
    • 1
  • Maria Elisabetta Zannin
    • 2
  • Enrica Convento
    • 1
  • Marta Cortese
    • 1
  • Edoardo Midena
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Fondazione G.B. Bietti per l’Oftalmologia, IRCCSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations