International Ophthalmology

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 495–500 | Cite as

Sensitivity of laser flare photometry compared to slit-lamp cell evaluation in monitoring anterior chamber inflammation in uveitis

  • Ottavio Bernasconi
  • Marina Papadia
  • Carl P. Herbort
Original Paper

Abstract

To study the sensitivity of laser flare photometry (LFP) in monitoring anterior chamber inflammation by correlating LFP measurements with slit-lamp evaluation of aqueous cells in HLA-B27-related uveitis in a prospective trial. Slit-lamp cell evaluation was correlated with LFP-measured flare in a masked fashion in HLA-B27-related uveitis patients receiving standard topical therapy. At the time of 50 and 90% LFP flare reduction, the corresponding reduction of cells was recorded and statistically compared using the sign test. Forty-three episodes (in 43 patients) of acute anterior HLA-B27-related uveitis were included. LFP flare reduction and slit-lamp cell reduction were strongly correlated. LFP was significantly more sensitive for both 50% (P = 0.001) and 90% (P = 0.02) LFP flare reduction in assessing the decrease of anterior chamber inflammation. LFP was superior to slit-lamp cell evaluation in monitoring anterior chamber inflammation in uveitis. Flare, becoming a quantitative parameter when measured by LFP, rather than cells, should be considered the gold standard to measure anterior chamber inflammation in uveitis.

Keywords

Laser flare photometry Intraocular inflammation Quantitative method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Kowa Co., Electronic & Optics Division Tokyo, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Hogan MJ, Kimura SJ, Thygeson P (1959) Signs and symptoms of uveitis. I. Anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 47(no. 5, pt. 2):155–170Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kimura SJ, Thygeson P, Hogan MJ (1959) Signs and symptoms of uveitis. II. Classification of the posterior manifestations of uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 47 (no. 5, pt. 2):171–176Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    SUN Working group (2005) Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the first international workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140:509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanski J (1987) Introduction. In: Kanski J (ed) Uveitis: a colour manual of diagnosis and treatment. Butterworths, London, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spalton DJ (1993) Measurement of flare. Br J Ophthalmol 77:263–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sawa M, Tsurimaki Y, Tsuru T, Shimizu H (1988) New quantitative method to determine protein concentration and cell number in aqueous in vivo. Jpn J Ophthalmol 32:132–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Maghraby A, Marzouki A, Matheen TM et al (1992) Reproducibility and validity of laser flare/cell meter measurements as an objective method of assessing intraocular inflammation. Arch Ophthalmol 110:960–962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castella AP, Bercher L, Zografos L, Egger E, Herbort CP (1995) Study of blood–aqueous barrier in choroidal melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol 79:354–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mermoud A, Pittet N, Herbort CP (1992) Inflammation patterns after laser trabeculoplasty measured with the laser flare meter. Arch Ophthalmol 110:368–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herbort CP, Mermoud A, Schnyder C, Pittet N (1993) Anti-inflammatory effect of diclofenac drops after argon laser trabeculoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 111:481–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herbort CP, Jauch A, Othenin-Girard P, Tritten JJ, Fsadni M (2000) Diclofenac drops to treat inflammation after cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:421–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guex-Crosier Y, Pittet N, Herbort CP (1995) Sensitivity of laser flare photometry to monitor inflammation in uveitis of the posterior segment. Ophthalmology 102:613–621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sawa M (1990) Clinical application of laser flare-cell meter. Jpn J Ophthalmol 34:346–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah SM, Spalton DJ, Taylor JC (1992) Correlations between laser flare measurements and anterior chamber protein concentrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:2878–2884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shah SM, Spalton DJ, Smith SE (1991) Measurement of aqueous cells and flare in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 75:348–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Ancos E, Pittet N, Herbort CP (1994) Mesure quantitative de l’inflammation dans l’uvéite antérieure aiguë (UAA) HLA B27 à l’aide du laser flare-cell meter Kowa FC-1000. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 204:330–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herbort CP, Guex-Crosier Y, de Ancos E, Pittet N (1997) Use of laser flare photometry (LFP) to assess and monitor inflammation in uveitis. Ophthalmology 104:64–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tugal-Tutkun I, Cingü K, Kir N, Yeniad B, Urgancioglu M, Gül A (2008) Use of laser flare-cell photometry to quantify intraocular inflammation in patients with Behçet’s uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:1169–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang W, Zhou H, Yang P, Huang X, Wang L, Kijlstra A (2008) Longitudinal quantification of aqueous flare and cells in Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Br J Ophthalmol 92:182–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herbort CP (2009) Laser flare photometry. In: Gupta A, Gupta V, Herbort CP, Khairallah M (eds) Uveitis: text and imaging. New Delhi, Jaypee, pp 28–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ottavio Bernasconi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marina Papadia
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carl P. Herbort
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Inflammatory and Retinal Eye DiseasesCentre for Ophthalmic Specialised Care (COS), Rue de la GrotteLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e ValliBellinzonaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Neurosciences, Ophthalmology and GeneticsUniversity of GenovaGenoaItaly
  4. 4.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations