International Ophthalmology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 157–160 | Cite as

Visual outcome in cataract surgery complicated by vitreous loss in a district general hospital

  • Ali A. MearzaEmail author
  • Sukumaran Ramanathan
  • Penelope Bidgood
  • Simon Horgan
Original Paper


Purpose To determine the visual outcome of patients following cataract surgery complicated by vitreous loss and to establish the factors, if any, that influenced the final visual outcome. Methods Retrospective review of all patients over a 1-year period who had planned phacoemulsification complicated by vitreous loss. Information was entered into a pre-devised proforma and the results analysed. Results Of the 1614 eyes operated on for cataract, 43 (2.66%) had surgery complicated by vitreous loss. The mean age of the patients experiencing surgical complications was 79.7 years (range 48–93 years). Twenty-three patients (53%) had at least one factor contributing to the difficulty of procedure, with dense cataract being the top factor in 11 patients. There was no statistically significant association between any pre-operative predisposing factor, stage at which vitreous loss occurred, grade of the surgeon and final visual outcome. When pre-existing co-morbidity was excluded, 26 of 30 (87%) patients achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better post-operatively. Cystoid macula oedema was the underlying cause in 50% of those patients that lost one or more lines post-operatively. Conclusions Surgeons at all levels of training had an acceptable complication rate, with the majority of patients achieving a good visual outcome. Dense cataract was the most common factor contributing to the complexity of the surgery.


Cataract surgery Visual outcome Vitreous loss 


  1. 1.
    Desai P, Minassian D, Reidy A (1999) National cataract surgery survey 1997–8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1336–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ionides A, Minassian D, Tuft S (2001) Visual outcome following posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 85:222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ang GA, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tan JH, Karwatowski WS (2002) Phacoemulsification cataract surgery and unplanned anterior vitrectomy—is it bad news? Eye 16:117–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan FM, Mathur R, Ku JJ, Chen C et al (2003) Short-term outcomes in eyes with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:537–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balent A, Civerchia LL, Mohamadi P (1988) Visual outcome of cataract extraction and lens implantation complicated by vitreous loss. J Cataract Refract Surg 14:158–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muhtaseb M, Kalhoro A, Ionides A (2004) A system for preoperative stratification of cataract patients according to risk of intraoperative complications: a prospective analysis of 1441 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1242–1246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berler DK (2000) Intra-operative complications during cataract surgery in the very old. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98:127–130PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali A. Mearza
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sukumaran Ramanathan
    • 1
  • Penelope Bidgood
    • 1
  • Simon Horgan
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Eye Unit, Kingston HospitalKingston-Upon-ThamesUK
  2. 2.Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations