Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 147–153 | Cite as

Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980–2005

  • Faris R. Ghosheh
  • Federico A. Cremona
  • Christopher J. RapuanoEmail author
  • Elisabeth J. Cohen
  • Brandon D. Ayres
  • Kristin M. Hammersmith
  • Irving M. Raber
  • Peter R. Laibson
Original Paper

Abstract

In this review, we analyze the trends in corneal transplantation over the past 25 years in the United States. The most dramatic change was the progressive sharp increase in the number of corneal transplants performed during the 1980s, corresponding with the rise of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) as the leading indication for keratoplasty. More recently, there has been a steady annual decline in total keratoplasties for more than a decade, corresponding with a decline in the cases performed for PBK, which still accounts for the highest percentage of cases done. Regrafts have been an increasingly important indication for keratoplasty, as older grafts fail. Keratoconus, Fuchs dystrophy, and other inherited diseases have remained consistent indications for keratoplasty during the last quarter century.

Keywords

Corneal transplantation Keratoplasty Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy Twenty-five-year trends United States 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith RE, McDonald HR, Nesburn AB, Minckler DS (1980) Penetrating keratoplasty: changing indications, 1947 to 1978. Arch Ophthalmol 98(7):1226–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arentsen JJ, Morgan B, Green WR (1976) Changing indications for keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 81(3):313–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brady SE, Rapuano CJ, Arentsen JJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR (1989) Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty, 1983–1988. Am J Ophthalmol 108(2):118–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyman L, Wittpenn J, Yang C (1992) Indications and techniques of penetrating keratoplasties, 1985–1988. Cornea 11(6):573–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, Lundergan MK, Olson RJ (1992) Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 110(10):1409–1411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindquist TD, McGlothlan JS, Rothkis WM, Chandler JW (1991) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty:1980–1988. Cornea 10(3):210–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Worthen DM, Boucher JA, Buxton J, Lowther G, Talbott M (1981) Update report on intraocular lenses. Update report on intraocular lenses. Ophtha 88(5):381–385Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay JT, Bath PE, Jacobs ME, Murray GC, McGhee ET, Talbott MW, Shipp MD, Thomas NE et al. (1984) The FDA report on intraocular lenses. Aust J Ophthalmol 12(1):61–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waring GO (1989) The 50-year epidemic of pseudophakic bullous edema. Arch Ophthalmol 107(5):657–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lois N, Kowal VO, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Gault JA, Raber IM, Laibson PR (1997) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1989–1995. Cornea 16(6):623–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flowers CW, Chang KY, McLeod SD, Irvine JA, McDonnell PJ, Rao N, Smith RE (1995) Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1989–1993. Cornea 14(6):583–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barron BA, Gee L, Hauck WW, Kurinij N, Dawson CR, Jones DB, Wilhelmus KR, Kaufman HE, Sugar J, Hyndiuk RA et al. (1994) A controlled trial of oral acyclovir for herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Ophthalmology 101:1871–1882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cosar CB, Sridhar MS, Cohen EJ, Held EL, Alvim P de T, Rapuano CJ, Raber IM, Laibson PR (2002) Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996–2000. Cornea 21(2):148–151Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugar A, Sugar J (2000) Techniques in penetrating keratoplasty: a quarter century of development. Cornea 19(5):603–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dobbins KR, Price FW Jr, Whitson WE (2000) Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 19(6):813–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang PC, Klintworth GK, Kim T, Carlson AN, Adelman R, Stinnett S, Afshari NA (2005) Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1980–2001. Cornea 24(7):801–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rapuano CJ (2001) Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12:288–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Darlington JK, Adrean SD and Schwab IR (2006) Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States from 1980 to 2004. Ophthalmology 113(12):2171–2175Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faris R. Ghosheh
    • 1
  • Federico A. Cremona
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Rapuano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elisabeth J. Cohen
    • 1
  • Brandon D. Ayres
    • 1
  • Kristin M. Hammersmith
    • 1
  • Irving M. Raber
    • 1
  • Peter R. Laibson
    • 1
  1. 1.Wills Eye Hospital Cornea ServicePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations