Online searching and learning: YUM and other search tools for children and teachers
- 426 Downloads
Information discovery tasks using online search tools are performed on a regular basis by school-age children. However, these tools are not necessarily designed to both explicitly facilitate the retrieval of resources these young users can comprehend and aid low-literacy searchers. This is of particular concern for educational environments, as there is an inherent expectation that these tools facilitate effective learning. In this manuscript we present an initial assessment conducted over (1) children-oriented search tools based on queries generated by K-9 students, analyzing features such as readability and adequacy of retrieved results, and (2) tools used by teachers in their classrooms, analyzing their main purpose and target audience’s age range. Among the examined tools, we include YouUnderstood.Me, an enhanced search environment, which is the result of our ongoing efforts on the development of a search environment tailored to 5-15 year-olds that can foster learning through the retrieval of materials that not only satisfy the information needs of these users but also match their reading abilities. The results of these studies highlight the fact that search results presented to children have average reading levels that do not match the target audience. In addition, tools oriented to teachers do not go beyond showing the progress of their students, and seldomly provide a simple way of retrieving class contents that fit current needs of students. These facts further showcase the need for developing a dual environment oriented to both teachers and students.
KeywordsChildren Search as learning Personalization Teachers
Portions of this research work were funded by the National Science Foundation - CRII:III Award Number 1565937. We also want to thank Oghenemaro Anuyah for her contributions to our work.
- Azpiazu, I. M., Dragovic, N., & Pera, M. S. (2016). Finding, understanding and learning: Making information discovery tasks useful for children and teachers. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on search as learning, SAL 2016, co-located with the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR 2016, Pisa, Italy, July 21, 2016.Google Scholar
- Bilal, D., & Boehm, M. (2013). Towards new methodologies for assessing relevance of information retrieval from web search engines on children’s queries. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 1, 93–100.Google Scholar
- Bilal, D., & Ellis, R. (2011). Evaluating leading web search engines on children’s queries. In J.A. Jacko (Ed.), Human–computer interaction. Users and applications. HCI2011. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 6764. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Chu, S. K. W., Tavares, N. J., Chu, D., Ho, S. Y., Chow, K., Siu, F. L. C., & Wong, M. (2012). Developing upper primary students 21st century skills: Inquiry learning through collaborative teaching and Web 2.0 technology. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Cole, R. W. (2008). Educating everybody’s children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
- Collins-Thompson, K., Bennett, P. N., White, R. W., de la Chica, S., & Sontag, D. (2011). Personalizing web search results by reading level. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM) (pp. 403–412). ACM.Google Scholar
- Crescenzi, A. (2016). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in time-constrained in information search. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_paper_5.pdf.
- Danby, S. (2013). Going online: Young children and teachers accessing knowledge through web interactions. Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 19(3), 30.Google Scholar
- Dragovic, N., Madrazo, I., & Pera, M. S. (2016). “Is sven seven?”: A search intent module for children. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 885–888).Google Scholar
- Dragovic, N., Madrazo, I., & Pera, M. S. (2017). A multi-criteria strategy to recommend queries for children (under review)Google Scholar
- Duarte Torres, S., Hiemstra, D., & Serdyukov, P. (2010). An analysis of queries intended to search information for children. In Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on information interaction in context (pp. 235–244). ACM.Google Scholar
- Duarte Torres, S., & Weber, I. (2011). What and how children search on the web. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 393–402). ACM.Google Scholar
- Eickhoff, C., Collins-Thompson, K., Bennett, P. N., & Dumais, S. (2013). Personalizing atypical web search sessions. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on web search and data mining (WSDM) (pp. 285–294).Google Scholar
- Freund, L., He, J., Gwizdka, J., Kando, N., Hansen, P., & Rieh, S. Y. (2014). Searching as learning (SAL) workshop 2014. In Proceedings of the 5th information interaction in context symposium IIiX ’14 (pp. 7–7). ACM.Google Scholar
- Gossen, T. (2016). Search engines for children: Search user interfaces and information-seeking behaviour. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gossen, T., Höbel, J., & Nürnberger, A. (2014). A comparative study about children’s and adults’ perception of targeted web search engines. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1821–1824). ACM.Google Scholar
- Gossen, T., Kotzyba, M., & Nürnberger, A. (2015). Knowledge journey exhibit: Towards age-adaptive search user interfaces. In A. Hanbury, G. Kazai, A. Rauber, & N. Fuhr (Eds.), Advances in information retrieval. ECIR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 9022. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Greenhill, V. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. In Partnership for 21st century skills. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519336.
- Gwizdka, J., Hansen, P., Hauff, C., He, J., & Kando, N. (2016). Search as learning (SAL) workshop 2016. In Proceedings of the 39th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 1249–1250). ACM.Google Scholar
- Hammonds, L., Matherson, L. H., Wilson, E. K., & Wright, V. H. (2013). Gateway tools: Five tools to allow teachers to overcome barriers to technology integration. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(1), 36–40.Google Scholar
- Huurdeman, H. C., & Kamps, J. (2015). Supporting the process: Adapting search systems to search stages. In S. Kurbanoglu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information literacy: Moving toward sustainability. Communications in computer and information science, vol. 552. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Jatowt, A., Akamatsu, K., Pattanasri, N., & Tanaka, K. (2012). Towards more readable web: Measuring readability of web pages based on link structure. SIGWEB Newsletter, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Kammerer, Y., & Bohnacker, M. (2012). Children’s web search with google: The effectiveness of natural language queries. In proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 184–187). ACM.Google Scholar
- Kepple, M., Campbell, L. O., Hartshorne, R., & Herlihy, C. (2015). An introductory examination of factors influencing k-12 teachers perceptions and use of emerging technological tools in the classroom. In Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2154–2156).Google Scholar
- Knight, S. (2014). Finding knowledge—what is it to ’know’ when we search? http://networkcultures.org/query/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2014/06/17.Simon_Knight.pdf.
- Koesten, L., Kacprzak, E., & Tennison, J. (2016). Learning when searching for web data. In SAL@ SIGIR. Google Scholar
- Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century: Learning in the 21st century. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Lau, T., & Horvitz, E. (1999). Patterns of search: Analyzing and modeling web query refinement. In J. Kay (Ed.), UM99 user modeling. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), vol. 407. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lennon, C., & Burdick, H. (2004). The lexile framework as an approach for reading measurement and success. https://cdn.lexile.com/cms_page_media/135/The%20Lexile%20Framework%20for%20Reading.pdf.
- Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Burlingame, C., Kulikowich, J., Sedransk, N., Coiro, J., & Kennedy, C. (2013). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Assessing and preparing students for the 21st century with common core state standards (pp. 219–236). http://newliteracies.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/448/2014/07/Leu-D.J.-Forzani-E.-Burlingame-C.-Kulikowich-J.-Sedransk-N.-Coiro-J.-Kennedy-C..pdf.
- Mc Laughlin, G. H. (1969). Smog grading—A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.Google Scholar
- Ofcom. (2014). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/76266/childrens_2014_report.pdf.
- PLB. (2016). Learning by repetition: Does it work? Professional Learning Board. http://k12teacherstaffdevelopment.com/tlb/learning-by-repetition-does-it-work/.
- Rideout, V., & Saphir, M. (2013). How do children reformulate their search queries? (Vol. 40). San Francisco: Common Sense Media.Google Scholar
- Rieh, S. Y., Gwizdka, J., Freund, L., & Collins-Thompson, K. (2014). Searching as learning: Novel measures for information interaction research. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., Withey, R., Jamali, H. R., Dobrowolski, T., & Tenopir, C. (2008). The google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. In Aslib proceedings (Vol. 60, pp. 290–310). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Rutter, S., Ford, N., & Clough, P. (2015). How do children reformulate their search queries? Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 20(1), n1.Google Scholar
- Shihab, M. M. (2009). Web 2.0 tools improve teaching and collaboration in high school English language classes. Nova Southeastern University.Google Scholar
- Syed, R., Collins-Thompson, K. (2016). Optimizing search results for educational goals: Incorporating keyword density as a retrieval objective. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_paper_21.pdf.
- Top 5 safe search engines for kids to filter out adult contents from search results (2016). http://mashtips.com/search-engines-for-kids.
- Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW), (pp. 705–714). ACM.Google Scholar
- Usta, A., Altingovde, I. S., Vidinli, I. B., Ozcan, R., & Ulusoy, Ö. (2014). How k-12 students search for learning? Analysis of an educational search engine log. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 1151–1154). ACM.Google Scholar
- Valenza, J. K., Boyer, B. L., & Curtis, D. (2014). Curation platforms. Library Technology Reports, 50(7), 60.Google Scholar
- Wang, H., He, X., Chang, M.-W., Song, Y., White, R. W., & Chu, W. (2013). Personalized ranking model adaptation for web search. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 323–332). ACM.Google Scholar
- West, D. M. (2001). State and federal e-government in the United States. https://www.brown.edu/academics/taubmancenter/sites/brown.edu.academics.taubman-center/files/uploads/egovt03us(1).pdf.
- Wilson, M. L., Ye, C., Twidale, M. B., Grasse, H., Rosenthal, J., & McKittrick, M. (2016). Search literacy: Learning to search to learn. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_paper_15.pdf.