Information Retrieval

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 148–161 | Cite as

An inquiry-based learning approach to teaching information retrieval



The study of information retrieval (IR) has increased in interest and importance with the explosive growth of online information in recent years. Learning about IR within formal courses of study enables users of search engines to use them more knowledgeably and effectively, while providing the starting point for the explorations of new researchers into novel search technologies. Although IR can be taught in a traditional manner of formal classroom instruction with students being led through the details of the subject and expected to reproduce this in assessment, the nature of IR as a topic makes it an ideal subject for inquiry-based learning approaches to teaching. In an inquiry-based learning approach students are introduced to the principles of a subject and then encouraged to develop their understanding by solving structured or open problems. Working through solutions in subsequent class discussions enables students to appreciate the availability of alternative solutions as proposed by their classmates. Following this approach students not only learn the details of IR techniques, but significantly, naturally learn to apply them in solution of problems. In doing this they not only gain an appreciation of alternative solutions to a problem, but also how to assess their relative strengths and weaknesses. Developing confidence and skills in problem solving enables student assessment to be structured around solution of problems. Thus students can be assessed on the basis of their understanding and ability to apply techniques, rather simply their skill at reciting facts. This has the additional benefit of encouraging general problem solving skills which can be of benefit in other subjects. This approach to teaching IR was successfully implemented in an undergraduate module where students were assessed in a written examination exploring their knowledge and understanding of the principles of IR and their ability to apply them to solving problems, and a written assignment based on developing an individual research proposal.


Inquiry-based learning Teaching information retrieval Language technology integration 


  1. Bawden, D., Bates, J., Steinerovu, J., Vakkari, P., & Vilar, P. (2007). Information retrieval curricula: Contexts and perspectives. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on teaching and learning in information retrieval (TLIR 2007) (pp. 55–60). London, UK. Accessed 29 Dec 2008.
  2. Bligh, D. (1998). What’s the use of lectures? (5th ed). Exeter: Intellect.Google Scholar
  3. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (1999). Understanding student learning. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, and S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching & learning in higher education (pp. 21–40). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  4. Furman, G. C. (1994). Outcome-based education and accountability. Education and Urban Society, 26(4), 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, G. J. F., & Edens, R. J. (2002). Automated alignment and annotation of audio-visual presentations. In Proceedings of the sixth European conference on research and development for digital libraries (ECDL 2002) (pp. 276–291). Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, G. J. F., & Gabb, S. M. (2002). Visualisation tool for topic tracking analysis and development. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR 2002) (pp. 389–390). Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, G. J. F., Quested, D. J., & Thomson, K. E. (2000). Personalised delivery of news articles from multiple sources. In Proceedings of the fourth European conference on digital libraries (ECDL 2000) (pp. 340–343). Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  9. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazarinis, F. (2007). Forming an instructional approach to teach web searching skills to non-English users. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 41(2), 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacFarlane, A. (2007). Pedagogic challenges in information retrieval—teaching mathematics to postgraduate information science students. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on teaching and learning in information retrieval (TLIR 2007) (pp. 39–44). London, UK. Accessed 29 Dec 2008.
  12. McFarlane, K. (2005). Learning about employability. In P. Hartley, A. Woods, M. Pill (Eds.), Enhancing teaching in higher education: New approaches for improving student learning (Chapt. 12, pp. 133–144). Nwe York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Merrill, M. D. (2002). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Merrill, M. D. (2007). A task-centered instructional strategy. Journal of Research on Technolgy in Education, 40(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
  15. Mizzaro, S. (2007). Teaching of web information retrieval: Web first or IR first?. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on teaching and learning in information retrieval (TLIR 2007) (pp. 50–54). London, UK. Accessed 29 Dec 2008.
  16. Robertson, S., & Spärck Jones, K. (1994). Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval (Revised edition 1996, 1997, 2006). Technical Report 356. University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations