The Journal of Value Inquiry

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 203–219 | Cite as

Temporal Asymmetry and the Self/Person Split

  • Patrick StokesEmail author

As philosophers have noted since Lucretius, humans are temporally asymmetric in the way they value goods. Not only are we generally biased towards near pleasures and pains at the expense of distant ones, but it also appears to be a deep fact about us that we tend to discount past pleasures relative to future ones, and are more worried by future pains than those that are already behind us. Such asymmetrical attitudes are only a problem, of course, if there are in fact no relevant differences between the past and future that might justify them – and the attempt to find such justifying differences hasn’t been entirely successful. Moreover, as Derek Parfit memorably demonstrated, this bias towards the future can lead us to form preferences that, counterintuitively, entail a lower overall welfare for a given life.1 We find ourselves caught between two apparently contradictory imperatives: a bias towards the future, and a concern for the overall quality of our lives.

There have been various...


Personal Identity Temporal Bias Temporal Asymmetry Welfare Assessment Asymmetric Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations