Advertisement

The Journal of Value Inquiry

, 43:457 | Cite as

The Ethics of Conspiracy Theorizing

  • Juha Räikkä
Article

Introduction

Philosophers have not been particularly interested in conspiracy theories. The few contributions that have appeared have concerned mainly epistemic questions. Following Karl Popper, who famously criticized the conspiracy theory of society in his Conjectures and Refutations, many authors have argued that conspiracy theories tend to be unwarranted.1 The list of alleged sins is long. It has been claimed that many conspiracy theories can be rejected simply by pointing out that the supposed conspirators did not have connections to each other or were too stupid to have designed such a vicious plan or lacked technological and material resources to carry it through. Furthermore, according to some critics, conspiracy theories tend to be irrefutable, appeal to unlikely motives, include explanatory gaps, conflict observed facts they grant, provide failed predictions, suffer from internal inconsistency, and attribute omnipotence to the alleged conspirators.2Philosophers who have...

Keywords

Ethical Evaluation Moral Condemnation Epistemic Virtue Conspiracy Theory Total Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations