Advertisement

Rethinking public and private policies in Europe with the support of a industrial sustainability index

  • Roberta ArbolinoEmail author
  • Luisa De Simone
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to design a new index for obtaining a measure of sustainable performance in the industrial sector (SIPI). This approach allows to evaluate the green policy implemented by both government and enterprises and to underline the differences between their actions concerning the environmental, economic, political and social issues. The SIPI main structure has been created by using multi-criteria method in accordance with OECD procedure (2008). The methodology has been built for application to EU-28 countries. The findings produce both the acknowledgement of the success and the identification of the weaknesses of the subjects involved in the policymaking process, providing a support for future planning. Nevertheless, the methodology was formulated in such a way that it could be readapted in other countries or regions.

Keywords

Industry ecology Sustainability Multivariate analysis Composite indicator 

Notes

References

  1. Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability- oriented innovation: a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Du, L., & Legros, A. H. P. (2015). Industrial policy and competition policy. In Nber Working Paper Series Industrial.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(90)90128-l.
  3. Aiginger, K. (2014). Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path. In WIFO Working Papers, (13).  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198706205.003.0019.
  4. Aiginger, K. (2017). This can still be Europe’s Century. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 2(3), 173–182.Google Scholar
  5. Aiginger, K. (2018). Political rebound effects as stumbling blocks for socio-ecological transition. American Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 6(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
  6. Altenburg, T., Assmann, C., Rodrik, D., Padilla, E., Ambec, S., Esposito, M., et al. (2017). Green industrial policy: Concept, policies, country experiences.Google Scholar
  7. Altenburg, T., & Assmann, C. (Eds.). (2017). Green industrial policy. Concept, policies, country experiences. Geneva, Bonn: UN Environment; German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitk (DIE).Google Scholar
  8. Antony, G. M., & Visweswara Rao, K. (2007). A composite index to explain variations in poverty, health, nutritional status and standard of living: Use of multivariate statistical methods. Public Health, 121(8), 578–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arbolino, R. (2013). Development policies in China: An analysis of the territorial imbalances. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing (Vol. 305).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3-1.
  10. Arbolino, R., De Simone, L., Carlucci, F., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: Implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Armingeon, K., Isler, C., Knöpfel, L., Weisstanner, D., & Engler, S. (2016). Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2014. University of Bern, 1960–2014. http://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data#Supplement.
  12. Ayres, R. U., Campbell, C. J., Casten, T. R., Horne, P. J., Kümmel, R., Laitner, J. A., et al. (2013). Sustainability transition and economic growth enigma: Money or energy? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 9, 8–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243–261.  https://doi.org/10.1205/095758200530763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bajo, M. (2016). Practical applications of principal component analysis in fixed income portfolio management (III): Relative value strategies… Aplicaciones prácticas del análisis de componentes principales en gestión de carteras de Renta Fija (III): Estrategias de, (November).Google Scholar
  15. Barrera-Roldán, A., Saldívar, A., Ortiz, S., Rosales, P., Nava, M., Aguilar, S., et al. (2003). Industrial sustainability index. Advances in Ecological Sciences, 18, 337–346. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-2942735262&partnerID=40&md5=39fc1a89ab78c3c4792f472b937b1204.
  16. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience, 1, 13–20.Google Scholar
  17. Bohringer, C., & Jochem, P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable: A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carayannis, E. G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2017). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 460–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clift, R., & Wright, L. (2000). Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(3), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2014). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  21. De Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2014). Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., & Evans, S. (2013). Strategies and ecosystem view for industrial sustainability. In Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainabilityproceedings of the 20th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, (Figure 2), 565–570.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-48-2.
  23. Esty, D. C., Cornelius, P., et al. (2002). Environmental performance measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & De Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship (pp. 47–60). New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2011), Commission Staff Working Paper: Impact Assessment, Energy Roadmap 2050, Brussels, SEC (2011) 1565.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2012), A stronger european industry for growth and economic recovery, Industrial policy communication update, Brussels, COM 582 final.Google Scholar
  27. FAO. (2013). Fao statistical yearbook 2013, crop production statistics. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization Rome.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
  28. Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2006). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  29. Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for Manufacturing Waste from one industrial process can serve as the raw materials for another, thereby reducing the impact of industry on the environment. Scientific American, 189, 144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2005). Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum, 36(4), 452–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science : An introduction. Journal of Public Policy, 26(4), 399–408.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600401.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, P. (2003). Fairness, responsibility, and climate change. Ethics and International Affairs, 17, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haščič, I. (2012). Environmental innovation in Germany. In OECD Environment Working Papers, 53(12), 34.Google Scholar
  34. Henisz, W. J. (2004). Political institutions and policy volatility. Economics and Politics, 16(1), 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2004.00129.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hsu, A., Johnson, L., Lloyd, A., 2013. Measuring progress. A Practical Guide from the Developers of the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) 80.Google Scholar
  36. Huppes, G., & Ishikawa, M. (2005). Eco-efficiency and Its xsTerminology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 43–46.  https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Husgafvel, R., Pajunen, N., Päällysaho, M., Paavola, I.-L., Inkinen, V., Heiskanen, K., et al. (2014). Social metrics in the process industry: Background, theory and development work. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 7, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Husgafvel, R., Pajunen, N., Virtanen, K., Paavola, I. L., Päällysaho, M., Inkinen, V., et al. (2015). Social sustainability performance indicators–experiences from process industry. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 8(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IEA. (2017). Key World Energy Statistics.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  40. Jensen, P. D., Basson, L., & Leach, M. (2011). Reinterpreting industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1, 1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00377.x.Google Scholar
  41. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835.Google Scholar
  42. Jung, E., Kim, J., & Rhee, S. (2001). The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 551–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00011-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14(1), 78–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 3(2).Google Scholar
  45. Knowledge Economy Indicators. (2005). Work package 7. State of the art report on simulation and indicators.Google Scholar
  46. KPMG. (2016). A clear insight, 2016(December).Google Scholar
  47. Krajnc, D., & Glavi, C. P. (2005). A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 43, 189–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krishnan, V. (2010). Constructing an area-based socioeconomic status index: a principal components analysis approach. Every day in every way: Creating learning experiences for every child, (May), 2–26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029.
  49. Kritikos, A. (2014). Greece needs a strategy for its transition to an innovation economy. DIW Economic Bulletin, 2013, 3–11.Google Scholar
  50. Labuschagne, C. (2007). Sustainable project life cycle management: criteria for the South African process industry.Google Scholar
  51. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. G. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.007.
  52. Levidow, L., Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P., Nilsson, Å., Skenhall, S. A., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2016). Process eco-innovation: Assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, 54–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.086.
  53. Levidow, L., Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P., Nilsson, Å., Skenhall, S. A., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2016b). Process eco-innovation: Assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, 54–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lin, C., & Chang, C.-C. (2015). The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J. F., & Van Der Kooij, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.3.336.
  56. Lundin, M. (2003). Indicators for measuring the sustainability of urban water systems – a life cycle approach. Department of Environmental Systems Analysis. Goteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
  57. Mann, J., & Shideler, D. (2015). Measuring schumpeterian activity using a composite indicator. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(1), 57–84.  https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-07-2013-0029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding and improving policies and programs. Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  59. Marti, C. P., Rovira-Val, M. R., & Drescher, L. G. J. (2015). Are firms that contribute to sustainable development better financially? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mayer-Spohn, O. (2004). Sustainable development indicators within the German water industry: A case study. Göteborg: Chalmers tekniska h{ö}gskola.Google Scholar
  61. Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., Marin, G., & Gilli, M. (2015). Sustainable development and industrial development: Manufacturing environmental performance, technology and consumption/production perspectives. In UNIDO ISID working paper series, 22, 1–47.Google Scholar
  62. McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity Growth, (February).  https://doi.org/10.3386/w17143.
  63. Mendonça, S., Pereira, T. S., & Godinho, M. M. (2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, 33(9), 1385–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Ippolito, C. (2016). Promoting sustainability through EMS application: A survey examining the critical factors about EMAS registration in Italian organizations. Sustainability, 8(3), 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Boylaud, O. (2000). Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/215182844604.Google Scholar
  66. OECD, (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en.
  67. OECD (2012), Beyond industrial policy—Emerging issues and new trends, draft STI working paper on industrial policy, Paris, DSTI/IND19.Google Scholar
  68. Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pohl, E. (2006). Towards corporate sustainable development the ITT flygt sustainability index, Technology.Google Scholar
  70. Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469–491.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Romano, O., & Ercolano, S. (2013). Who makes the most? Measuring the “Urban environmental virtuosity”. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 709–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0078-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 65–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0024-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siche, J. R., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E., & Romeiro, A. (2008). Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 628–637.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Siddig, A. A. H., Ellison, A. M., Ochs, A., Villar-Leeman, C., & Lau, M. K. (2016). How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicators.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.036.Google Scholar
  76. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turnhout, E. (2009). The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 403–412.  https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X442007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M., & Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2013). Robert Ayres, ecological economics and industrial ecology. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions..  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.09.008.Google Scholar
  80. Wang, D., Li, S., & Sueyoshi, T. (2014). DEA environmental assessment on US Industrial sectors: Investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability. Energy Economics, 45, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, M., Allen, D., Clift, R., & Sas, H. (1997). Measuring corporate environmental performance: the ICI environmental burden system. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(4), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zuo, X., Hua, H., Dong, Z., & Hao, C. (2017). Environmental performance index at the provincial level for China 2006–2011. Ecological Indicators, 75, 48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Social ScienceUniversity of Naples “L’Orientale”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations