The weakness of the strong: re-examining power in transboundary water dynamics
- 159 Downloads
This article proposes a re-examination of how power is conceptualized within transboundary hydropolitics by arguing that power has been misrepresented in the water resources literature. Overemphasis on the factors of a country’s relative power, riparian position, and technological potential to exploit the resource has led to assumptions that the non-hegemon(s) is often unable to achieve their own positive outcomes and that the outcomes of interactions between hegemons and non-hegemons are predictable and detrimental. However, it appears that there are many examples that run counter to the power narrative that employs these factors. This study argues that this overemphasis neglects hegemonic vulnerabilities, which, when included with hegemonic capacities, are much more instructive in explaining transboundary water dynamics. The sources of the weakness of the strong of the alleged hegemon originates from several sources, including interlinkages between water and non-water issues, internal and external expectations, and consideration of whether the water-related issue at hand is crucial to each party’s survival or whether the party has the luxury to survive the outcome of the resolution. These factors allow for non-hegemons to achieve more favorable outcomes and, when incorporated in analysis, provide a fuller picture of the true power balance in each transboundary water interaction. We therefore call for a reconceptualization of power dynamics in transboundary waters that accounts for structural weaknesses present within all parties.
KeywordsTransboundary water Conflict and cooperation Hegemony Hydro-hegemony
The authors are grateful to Samer Alatout, Shlomi Dinar, Gabriel Eckstein, Ashok Swain, and Erika Weinthal for their insightful feedback and suggestions. We also wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments and the Ken Alberman Fellowship for their support.
- Alatout, S. (2007). State-ing natural resources through law: The codification and articulation of water scarcity and citizenship in Israel. Arab World Geographers, 10(1), 16–37.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, D. A. (2012). Power and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 273–297). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Butts, K. H. (1997). The strategic importance of water. Parameters, 27(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
- Capannelli, G., Lee, J.W. & Petri, P. (2009). Developing Indicators for Regional Economic Integration and Cooperation. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 33, http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1824.
- Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. In A. Earle, A. Jägerskog, & J. Öjendal (Eds.), Trasnboundary water management: Principles and practice (pp. 27–42). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Collard, R. (2014). Why Iraq is so desperate to retake Mosul Dam from ISIS. Time magazine. 16 August. http://time.com/3126423/iraq-isis-mosul-dam-airstrikes/. Accessed 19 March 2016.
- Denoon, D. B., & Brams, S. J. (2001). Fair division in the Spratly Islands conflict. In P. F. Diehl & N. P. Gleditsch (Eds.), Environmental conflict (pp. 199–224). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Dinar, S., Katz, D., De Stefano, L., & Blankespoor, B. (2014). Climate change, conflict, and cooperation: Global analysis of the resilience of international river treaties to increased water variability. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 6916. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2010). Bargaining power and negotiation tactics: The negotiations on the EU’s financial perspective, 2007–13. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 557–578.Google Scholar
- El-Behairy, N. (2013). Morsi: If our share of Nile water decreases, our blood will be the alternative. Daily News Egypt. 11 June. http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2013/06/11/morsi-if-our-share-of-nile-water-decreases-our-blood-will-be-the-alternative/. Accessed 29 September 2013.
- Elhance, A. P. (1999). Hydropolitics in the third world: Conflict and cooperation in international river basins. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
- Fischhendler, I. (2004). Legal and institutional adaptation to climate uncertainty: A study of international rivers. Water Policy, 6, 281–302.Google Scholar
- Fischhendler, I., & Feitelson, E. (2003). Spatial adjustment as a mechanism for resolving river basin conflicts: U.S.-Mexico case. Political Geography, 25(5), 547–573.Google Scholar
- Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Frey, F. W. (1984). Middle East water: The potential for conflict or cooperation. In T. Naff & R. C. Matson (Eds.), Water in the Middle East: Conflict or cooperation (pp. 180–198). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Habeeb, W. M. (1988). Power and tactics in international negotiation: How weak nations bargain with strong nations. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, E. (2002). Strategic scarcity: The origins and impact of environmental conflict ideas. Ph.D. Thesis, Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
- Hearing at the Committee of Foreign Affairs. (1945). In US Congress, Senate, Committee of Foreign Relations, Hearings. Water treaty with Mexico, 79th Congress, first session.Google Scholar
- Heuler, H. (2013). Tensions mount as Uganda proceeds with Nile River Agreement. Voice of America. http://www.voanews.com/content/tensions-mount-as-uganda-proceeds-with-nile-river-agreement-cfa/1692986.html. Accessed 17 September 2013.
- Hollis, D. B. (2005). Why state consent still maters—non-state actors, treaties, and the changing sources of international law. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 23(1), 137–174.Google Scholar
- Huntington, E. (1915). Civilization and climate. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). Getting hegemony right. The National Interest, 17. Academic OneFile. Web. 24 Sept. 2016.Google Scholar
- Jones, S. (2006). Antonio gramsci. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Keohane, R. O. (1980). The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes. In O. Holsti, R. Siverson, & A. George (Eds.), Change in the international system (pp. 1967–1977). Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
- Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
- Klare, M. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- LeMarquand, D. (1977). International rivers: The politics of cooperation. Vancouver: Westwater Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Lukes, S. (1975). Power: A radical view. Houndmills: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar
- MacQuarrie, P. (2004). Water security in the Middle East: Growing conflict over development in the Euphrates–Tigris Basin. Master’s Thesis. Univerisity of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/related_research/MacQuarrie2004_abstract.htm. Accessed 11 September 2016.
- McCaffrey, S. (1996). The Harmon Doctrine one hundred years later: Buried, not praised. Natural Resources Journal, 36, 549–590.Google Scholar
- McCaffrey, S. (1998). The UN convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses: Prospects and pitfalls. In M. A. Salman, & L. Boisson De Chazournes (Eds.), International watercourses. Enhancing cooperation and managing conflict. Proceedings of a World Bank Seminar (pp. 17–28). Washington, DC: World Bank (World Bank Technical Paper 414).Google Scholar
- McIntyre, O. (2011). The World Court’s ongoing contribution to international water law: The Pulp Mills Case between Argentina and Uruguay. Water Alternatives, 4(2), 124–144.Google Scholar
- Menga, F. (2016a). Domestic and international dimensions of transboundary water politics. Water Alternatives, 9(3), 704–723.Google Scholar
- Menga, F. (2016b). Reconceptualizing hegemony: The circle of hydro-hegemony. Water Policy, 18, 401–418.Google Scholar
- Naff, T., & Matson, R. C. (1984). Water in the Middle East: Conflict or cooperation?. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Natsios, A. (2013). Egypt’s three challenges. US News & World Report, 2 August. http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/world-report/2013/08/02/egypts-three-challenges-its-coup-its-economy-and-the-nile-river. Accessed 19 August 2013.
- Oestigaard, T. (2012). Water security and food security along the Nile: Politics, population and climate change. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikaininstitutet.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pitman, G. T. (1998). The role of the World Bank in enhancing cooperation and resolving conflict on international watercourse: The case of the Indus Basin. In S. M. A. Salman (Ed.), International Watercourses enhancing cooperation and managing conflict, Proceedings of the World Bank seminar, World Bank Technical Paper No. 414.Google Scholar
- Smart, B. (2001). Michel foucault: Critical assessments. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sneddon, C., Harris, L. H., & Goldin, J. A. (2013). Placing hegemony: Water governance concepts and their discontents. In L. Harris, J. Goldin, & C. Sneddon (Eds.), Contemporary water governance in the Global South. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Swatuk, L. (2005). Political challenges to managing intra-basin water resources in Southern Africa: Drawing lessons from cases. In L. Wirkus (Ed.), Water, development and co-operation—Comparative prospective: Euphrates-Tigris and southern Africa. Bonn International Centre for Conversion: Bonn.Google Scholar
- Turton, A. (2005). Hydro-Hegemony in the Context of the Orange River Basin. Workshop on Hydro Hegemony, 20-21 May; London. http://www.anthonyturton.com/assets/my_documents/my_files/Hydro_Hegemony_in_the_Context_of_the_Orange_River_Basin1.pdf.
- Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271.Google Scholar
- Waterbury, J. (2002). The Nile: National determinants of collective action. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Wittfogel, K. A. (1956). The hydraulic civilizations. In W. L. Thomas (Ed.), Reprint: Man’s role in changing the face of the earth (pp. 152–164). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Zartman, I. W. (1971). Politics of Trade Negotiations Between Africa and the European Economic Community: The Weak Confronts the Strong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Zeitoun, M., Eid-Sabbagh, K., Talhami, M., & Dajani, M. (2013). Hydro-hegemony in the Upper Jordan waterscape: Control and use of the flows. Water Alternatives, 6(1), 86–106.Google Scholar