Crowdsourcing global governance: sustainable development goals, civil society, and the pursuit of democratic legitimacy
- 704 Downloads
To what extent can crowdsourcing help members of civil society overcome the democratic deficit in global environmental governance? In this paper, I evaluate the utility of crowdsourcing as a tool for participatory agenda-setting in the realm of post-2015 sustainable development policy. In particular, I analyze the descriptive representativeness (e.g., the degree to which participation mirrors the demographic attributes of non-state actors comprising global civil society) of participants in two United Nations orchestrated crowdsourcing processes—the MY World survey and e-discussions regarding environmental sustainability. I find that there exists a perceptible demographic imbalance among contributors to the MY World survey and considerable dissonance between the characteristics of participants in the e-discussions and those whose voices were included in the resulting summary report. The results suggest that although crowdsourcing may present an attractive technological approach to expand participation in global governance, ultimately the representativeness of that participation and the legitimacy of policy outputs depend on the manner in which contributions are solicited and filtered by international institutions.
KeywordsSustainable development Crowdsourcing Democracy Civil society Environmental governance
Human Development Index
Millennium Development Goals
Sustainable Development Goals
United Nations Development Group
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Environment Programme
- Aitamurto, T. (2012). Crowdsourcing for democracy: New era in policy–making. Committee for the Future, Parliament of Finland. https://www.academia.edu/2399833/Crowdsourcing_for_Democracy_New_Era_In_Policy_Making. Accessed 18 January 2015.
- Aitamurto, T., & Landemore, H. (2015). Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking: Assessing the case of crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland. Journal of Social Media for Organizations, 2(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, S. (2004). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1(1–2), 139–166.Google Scholar
- Bexell, M., Tallberg, J., & Uhlin, A. (2010). Democracy in global governance: The promises and pitfalls of transnational actors. Global Governance, 16, 81–101.Google Scholar
- Bonanni, L. (2015). Why information sharing is essential to climate resilience: Lessons from superstorm Sandy. sustainablebrands.com. http://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/marketing_comms/leonardo_bonanni/why_information_sharing_essential_climate_resilience. Accessed 29 January 2015.
- Bott, M., Gigler, B. S., & Young, G. (2011). The role of crowdsourcing for better governance in fragile state contexts. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Bott, M., & Young, G. (2012). The role of crowdsourcing for better governance in international development. Fletcher Journal of Human Security, 27, 47–70.Google Scholar
- Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Loukis, E. (2012). Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & Ø. Sæbø (Eds.), Electronic participation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Coleman, S. (Ed.). (2001). 2001: Cyber space odyssey: The internet in the UK election. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
- Freeman, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). Understanding e-democracy. eJournal of e-Democracy and Open Government, 5(2), 141–154.Google Scholar
- Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R., & Schader, M. (2011). Managing the crowd: Towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
- Gemmill, B., Ivanova, M., & Chee, Y. L. (2002). Designing a new architecture for global environmental governance. In World Summit for Sustainable Development briefing papers. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. http://www.poptel.org.uk/iied/test/searching/ring_pdf/wssd_21_international_environmental_governance.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Gray, R. (2014). Crowdsourcing for policy innovation. Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy.Google Scholar
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2012). Democratic process in online crowds and communities. eJournal of e-Democracy and Open Government, 4(2), 160–170.Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, L., Gallegos, M. C., Chan, L., Makam, P., & Nsabimana, J. (n.d.). Outreach report: Consultation on environmental sustainability in the post-2015 development agenda. Outreach Support Team for the Thematic Consultation on Environmental Sustainability in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. http://www.worldwewant2015.org/file/357718/download/389222. Accessed 5 February 2015.
- Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Internet world users by language. (2014). Internet World Stats. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.html. Accessed 7 February 2015.
- MYWorld2015 analytics. (2013). MY World: The United Nations global survey for a better world. http://data.myworld2015.org/. Accessed 5 February 2015.
- Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linner, B. -O. (2014). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Prpić, J., Taeihagh, A., & Melton, J. (2014). A framework for policy crowdsourcing. Presented at the Oxford Internet Policy and Politics Conference, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
- Rudge, M. (2014). Can ordinary people shape development outcomes? In Global development goals: Partnerships for progress. UNA-UK.Google Scholar
- Saward, M. (2000). Less than meets the eye: Democratic legitimacy and deliberative theory. In M. Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 66–77). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Scherr, J. (2012). Reflections on the race to Rio: Crowdsourcing sustainability at earth summit 2012. Switchboard, from NRDC. http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jscherr/reflections_on_the_race_to_rio.html. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Scholte, J. A. (2002). Civil society and democracy in global governance. Global Governance, 8(3), 281–304.Google Scholar
- Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (1998). Trust and democratic governance. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 269–294). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015). World Population Prospects, the 2015 Revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/. Accessed 9 February 2016.
- UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. (2012). Realizing the future we want for all: Report to the secretary-general. New York. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Post_2015_UNTTreport.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- UNDG. (2013). A million voices: The world we want | A sustainable future with dignity for all. http://www.undg.org/docs/13183/f_UNDG_MillionVoices_Web_full.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2015.
- UNDG. (2014). Human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2015.
- UNDP. (2013). Breaking down the silos: Integrating environmental sustainability in the post-2015 agenda. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/environment-energy/integrating-environmental-sustainability-post-2015.html. Accessed 5 February 2015.
- UNDP. (2015). Human development report 2015: Work for Human Development. New York: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report_1.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2016.
- UNGA. (2011). Accelerating progress towards the Millennium Development Goals: Options for sustained and inclusive growth and issues for advancing the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015 (A/66/126). http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Attach/Capacity/manila/Presentations/A_66_126.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2015.
- UNGA. (2014). The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet (A/69/700). http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/69/700&Lang=E. Accessed 14 October 2015.
- Warkentin, C. (2001). Reshaping world politics: NGOs, the internet, and global civil society. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar