Governing Iberian Rivers: from bilateral management to common basin governance?
- 287 Downloads
Traditionally, international water resources have been managed by riparian states based essentially on a technical hydraulic approach, addressing navigation concerns, water flows at the border and shared hydraulic structures, besides the definition of political borders. During the 1990s, the possibility of a paradigm change emerged, where a “technical hydraulic management approach” seemed to be giving way to a more “political environmental governance approach”. Yet, in many cases, this change did not ensue. This article argues that several riparians are trapped in stalemate due to a too strong sovereign approach to their water relations. Adopting a critical perspective on hydro-hegemony, this article argues that this framework of analysis is too limited since it is embedded in a Westphalian concept of sovereignty. To support this argument, the article draws on the Iberian Peninsula water politics. These riparians are still embedded in notions of territorial sovereignty, not being able to take on a holistic water basin governance regime embedded on considerations of equity, human rights and social justice. The article concludes that it is vital to move beyond a static sovereignty-based analysis of riparian relations and engage in a dynamic discussion of different water governance models and their consequences concerning peace and development.
KeywordsWater governance Portugal Spain Hydro-hegemony European Union Sovereignty
The public Portuguese Electricity Company
Spanish National Hydrological Plan
- Ackerman, J., & Tir, J. (2003). To share or not to share: Conditions affecting signing of river-managing treaties between riparian states. Paper presented at the international studies association annual convention, Portland, United States of America, February 25 to March 1, 2003.Google Scholar
- Almeida, A. B. d., Portela, M. M., & Machado, M. (2009). A case of transboundary water agreement-the Albufeira Convention. STRIVER Technical Brief No. 9.Google Scholar
- Bakker, K. J. (2003). An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales (Oxford Geographical and Environmental Studies).. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Barraqué, B. (Ed.). (1995). As Políticas da Água na Europa. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.Google Scholar
- Barraqué, B., & Mostert, E. (2006). Transboundary river basin management in Europe. Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper 21.Google Scholar
- Blatter, J., & Ingram, H. (Eds.). (2001). Reflection on water: New approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bukowski, J. J. (2011). Sharing water on the Iberian Peninsula: A Europeanisation approach to explaining transboundary cooperation. Water Alternatives, 4(2), 171–196.Google Scholar
- CNPGB n/a. Barragem de Alqueva. Comissão Nacional Portuguesa das Grandes Barragens. http://cnpgb.inag.pt/gr_barragens/gbportugal/Alqueva.htm. Accessed July 26, 2010.
- Collier, U., Golub, J., & Kreher, A. (Eds.). (1997). Subsidiarity and shared responsibility: New challenges for EU environmental policy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
- Conca, K. (2005). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Correia, F. N. (1991). A problemática da água no contexto do ambiente em Portugal. In: MARN (Ed.), Livro Branco sobre o Estado do Ambiente em Portugal–Anexos. Lisboa: Ministério do Ambiente e Recursos Naturais.Google Scholar
- Correia, F. N. (1996). O que separa também une. In Proceedings of the Conferência Portugal-Espanha “O que separa também une” (pp. 91–112). Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.Google Scholar
- Cunha, L.V. d. (1996). Recursos Hídricos Luso-Espanhóis. O passado e o futuro. Paper presented at the III Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Recursos Hídricos, Lisboa.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency (2010). The European environment: State and outlook 2010 http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer. Consulted April 2, 2012.
- Fowler, M. R., & Bunck, K. M. (1995). Law, power and the sovereign state: The evolution and application of the concept of sovereignty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
- Freire, M. R., & Lopes, P. D. (2008). Reconceptualizar a paz e a violência: Uma análise crítica. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 82, 13–29.Google Scholar
- Gutiérrez, R. (2006). Between knowledge and politics: The role of Técnicos in the Brazilian water management reform. PhD dissertation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- INAG. (2004). Plano Nacional da Água (Vol. I). Lisboa: Instituto Nacional da Água.Google Scholar
- Jägerskog, A. (2002). Contributions of Regime Theory in Understanding Interstate Water Cooperation: Lessons Learned in the Jordan River Basin. In A. R. Turton & R. Henwood (Eds.), Hydropolitics in the developing world: A Southern African perspective (pp. 73–78). Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU).Google Scholar
- Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural causes and regimes consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1–22). Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Kreijen, G. (Ed.). (2002). State, sovereignty and international governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lipper, J. (1967). Equitable utilization. In A. H. Garretson, R. D. Hayton, & C. J. Olmstead (Eds.), The law of international drainage basin. Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
- Lopes, P.D. (2001). As políticas da água de Foz Côa. In M. E. Gonçalves (Ed.), O caso de Foz Côa: um laboratório de análise socio-política (pp. 65–102). Lisboa: Edições 70.Google Scholar
- Lopez-Gunn, E. (2009). Agua para todos: A new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 370–394.Google Scholar
- MOPMA. (1993). Plan Hidrológico Nacional. Memoria. Madrid: Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Medio Ambiente.Google Scholar
- Saramago, J. (2008). Espanha quer mais água de Alqueva. Correio da Manhã.Google Scholar
- Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
- Suhardiman, D., and Giordano, M. (2012). Process-focused analysis in transboundary water governance research. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-012-9176-z.
- Vlachos, E., & Correia, F. N. (Eds.). (2000). Shared water systems and transboundary issues, with special emphasis on the Iberian Peninsula. Lisboa: Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento.Google Scholar
- Warner, J. (2004). Plugging the GAP—working with Buzan: The Illisu Dam as a security issue. SOAS Water Issues Study Group, Occasional Paper 67.Google Scholar
- Warner, J. (2005). Hydro-hegemony as a layered cake: Hydro-hegemonic strategies in the case of Turkey. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony: London Water Research Group, University of London. 2005.Google Scholar
- Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271–288.Google Scholar
- Warner, J. (2012). The struggle over Turkey’s Ilısu dam: Domestic and international security linkages. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-012-9178-x.
- Warner, J., & Zawahri, N. (2012). Hegemony and asymmetry: Multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-012-9177-y.
- Williams, P. (2003). The security politics of enclosing transboundary river water resources. Paper presented at the conference on resource politics and security in a global age, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. T. (1995). Hydropolitics along the Jordan River: Scarce water and Its impacts on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. (2003). ‘Water Wars’ and Other Tales of Hydromythology. In B. McDonald & D. Jehl (Eds.), Whose water is it? The unquenchable thirst of a water-hungry world (pp. 109–124). Washington D.C.: National Geographic.Google Scholar
- Zawahri, N.A., & Hensengerth, O. (2012). Domestic environmental activists and the governance of the Ganges and Mekong Rivers in India and China. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-012-9179-9.
- Yoffe, S.B. (2001). Basins at risk: Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources. PhD Dissertation. Portland: Oregon State University.Google Scholar