Wine, fruit, and emission reductions: the CDM as development strategy in Chile
- 297 Downloads
Through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol, a developed country actor with a binding emission reduction target can use emission reductions from a project implemented in a developing country to meet this target. At the same time, CDM projects are meant to contribute to sustainable development in the host country, as defined by this country. The CDM is often taken to illustrate a broader contemporary turn in environmental policymaking toward market liberalism, flexibility, and pluralism, where the governance of the CDM involves ‘agency beyond the state’ at different political levels and across various jurisdictions. While such an image of the CDM certainly identifies important aspects, it also downplays the ways in which states govern the CDM, not at the international level but at the domestic level through the host country prerogative to define its sustainable development priorities. Early on in the scholarly debate on the CDM, fears were raised about a ‘race to the bottom’ with regard to sustainable development requirements on CDM projects. Our research on Chile confirms that hypothesis, with the important addition, that the ‘race’ is not simply a structural feature of the CDM, but a deliberate strategy. We argue that Chile has actively chosen to put only marginal emphasis on securing the CDM’s contribution to sustainable development, and instead uses the CDM primarily as a tool to attract foreign investments, treating carbon credits as just another export product.
KeywordsClean Development Mechanism (CDM) Chile Kyoto protocol Sustainable development
Activities Implemented Jointly
Clean Development Mechanism
Certified Emissions Reductions
Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente
Corporación de Fometo de la Producción
Declaration of environmental impact
Designated national authority
Environmental impact assessment
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- Benecke, G. (2011). Networking for climate change: Agency in the context of renewable energy governance in India. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11. doi: 10.1007/s10784-011-9148-8.
- Biermann, F. (2006). Global governance and the environment. In M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, & D. Stevis (Eds.), Palgrave advances in international environmental politics (pp. 236–261). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D.,et al, (2009). Earth system governance: people, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project. Earth system governance report 1, IHDP report 20. Bonn: IHDP.Google Scholar
- Boyd, E., Gutierrez, M., & Chang, M. (2007). Small-scale forest carbon projects: Adapting CDM to low-income communities. Global Environmental Change, 17, 250–259.Google Scholar
- Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- CONAMA. (1994). Ley No 19.300 Sobre bases generales del medio ambiente. Santiago.Google Scholar
- CONAMA. (1998). Una política ambiental para el desarrollo dustentable. Santiago.Google Scholar
- CONAMA. (2003). Acuerdo No 216/2003. Autoridad nacional designada para efectos del mecanismo de desarrollo limpio en el marco del protocolo de Kioto. Santiago.Google Scholar
- CONAMA. (2010). Listado proyectos MDL aprobados por la autoridad nacional designada. Retrieved March 17, 2010, from http://www.conama.cl/portal/1301/article-44977.html.
- Conca, K. (2005). Old states in new bottles? The hybridization of authority in global environmental governance. In J. Barry & R. Eckersley (Eds.), The state and the global ecological crisis (pp. 181–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Corbera, E. (2005). Bringing development into forestry markets: Challenges and outcomes of small-scale carbon forestry activities in Mexico. In D. Murdiyarso & H. Herawati (Eds.), Carbon forestry: Who will benefit? (pp. 42–56). Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
- Cosbey, A., Murphy, D., Drexhage, J., & Balint, J. (2006). Making development work in the CDM. Phase II of the development dividend project. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
- Coto, O., & Morera, L. (2004). Cambio Climático: Capacidades Técnicas Existentes y Actividades relacionadas con el Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio (MDL) en los Paises de América Latina y el Caribe. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.olade.org.ec/documentos/CapacidadTecnExistentesActivRelacionadas-MDL.pdf.
- Figueres, C. (2004). Institutional capacity to integrate economic development and climate change considerations. An assessment of DNAs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.iadb.org/sds/env.
- Hurrell, A., & Kingsbury, B. (1992). The international politics of the environment: An introduction. In A. Hurrell & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The international politics of the environment: Actors, interests, and institutions (pp. 1–47). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- JIQ. (2007). Contribution of CDM projects to sustainable development: Dutch case study. Joint Implementation Quarterly , 13(3), 1–2.Google Scholar
- Lipschutz, R. (2004). Global environmental politics. Power, perspective and practice. Washington D.C: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Lohmann, L. (2006). Carbon trading. A critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power. Development Dialogue, 48, 1–360.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2005). Environmental performance reviews: Chile. Conclusions and recommendations. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved August 16, 2010, from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/44/34856244.pdf .
- Olhoff, A., Markandya, A., Halsnaes, K., & Taylor, T. (2004). CDM sustainable development impacts. Denmark: UNEP-Risoe Center.Google Scholar
- Schneider, L. (2007). Is the CDM fulfilling its environmental and sustainable development objectives? An evaluation of the CDM and options for improvements. Berlin: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
- Stripple, J., & Lövbrand, E. (2010). Carbon market governance beyond the public-private divide. In F. Biermann, P. Pattberg, & F. Zelli (Eds.), Global climate governance post 2012: Architectures, agency and adaptation (pp. 165–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (2006). The Clean Development Mechanism. An assessment of progress. United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
- UNEP Risoe. (2010). CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Database, Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://cdmpipeline.org/.
- UNFCCC. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add1, Kyoto).Google Scholar
- UNFCCC. (2001). Report to the Conference of the Parties on its seventh session. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties. (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add2, Marrakesh).Google Scholar
- Whitehead, M., Jones, R., & Jones, M. (2007). The nature of the state: excavating the political ecologies of the modern state. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar