Pursuits of adaptiveness in the shared rivers of Monsoon Asia

  • Louis LebelEmail author
  • Jianchu Xu
  • Ram C. Bastakoti
  • Amrita Lamba
Original Paper


How water should be managed in Monsoon Asia is emerging as one of the core earth system governance challenges. In this article, we explore the politics around pursuits of adaptiveness in water management, emphasizing the major transboundary river basins draining the south and eastern Himalayas. We look at two main functions: storing, diverting and sharing water for periods of scarcity; protecting people and places from destructive floods. We find that the pursuit of adaptiveness will take place partly outside the range of human experience in a context of large differences in exposure and vulnerabilities, disparate interests and unequal power. Anticipatory policies and actions to adapt and improve adaptive capacity to the transboundary impacts of changes in water-use, land-use and climate on water resources and services are still in their infancy; but several problem-framing discourses are emerging that have longer-term implications for water governance. It is not yet clear how these competing policy-frames will evolve in Asia. Much will depend on how systems of water governance develop. Public scrutiny of how governments in Asia plan to adapt to climate change in the water sector—on how risks of not enough and too much water are dealt with—will need to continue to help sort out those projects and strategies which are driven primarily by political benefits from those which actually contribute to building adaptive capacities and maintaining social-ecological resilience.


Climate change Water governance Monsoon Asia Transboundary rivers 



Basin Development Plan


Ganges Water Treaty


Indus Water Treaty


Mekong River Commission


National River Linking Project



This work was funded by: Asia–Pacific Network for Global Environmental Change Research (Grant ARCP2008-15NMY-Nikitina); Echel Eau and the International Fund for Agricultural Development under a grant under the Challenge Program on Water and Food (PN50 or M-POWER Project); and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 226571. Thanks to Rajesh Daniel, two anonymous reviewers and the editors of this special issue Frank Biermann and Ruben Zondervan for their constructive feedback.


  1. Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawala, S., Raksakulthai, V., van Aalst, M., Larsen, P., Smith, J., & Reynolds, J. (2003). Development and climate change in Nepal: Focus on water resources and hydropower. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Q. K., & Ahmed, A. U. (2003). Regional cooperation in flood management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna region: Bangladesh perspective. Natural Hazards, 28, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alagh, Y. K., Pangare, G., & Gujja, B. (Eds.). (2006). Interlinking of rivers in India—Overview and Ken-Betwa Link. New Delhi: Academic Foundation and the National Civil Society Committee on Interlinking of Rivers in India.Google Scholar
  5. Alam, U., Sahota, P., & Jeffrey, P. (2007). Irrigation in the Indus basin: A history of unsustainability? Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 7, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali, S. (2008). Water politics in South Asia: Technocratic cooperation and lasting security in the Indus basin and beyond. Journal of International Affairs, 61, 167–182.Google Scholar
  7. Amarasinghe, U., Shah, T., & Malik, R. (Eds.). (2008). Strategic analyses of the National River Linking Project (NRLP) of India. Series 1. India’s water future: Scenarios and issues. New Delhi: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Bagla, P. (2009). No sign yet of Himalayan meltdown, Indian report finds. Science, 236, 924–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakker, M. (2009). Transboundary river floods: Examining countries, international river basins and continents. Water Policy, 11, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baran, E., & Myschowoda, C. (2009). Dams and fisheries in the Mekong basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 12, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baran, E., Starr, P., & Kura, Y. (2007). Influence of built structures on Tonle Sap fisheries. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Cambodian National Mekong Committee and the WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  12. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J., & Lettenmaier, D. (2005). Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in a snow-dominated region. Nature, 438, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhaduri, A., & Barbier, E. B. (2008). International water transfer and sharing: the case of the Ganges River. Environment and Development Economics, 13, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Biagani, B. (2007). NAPA implementation in practicecurrent status of the LDCF portfolio. (Presentation for LEG stocktaking meeting on the National Adaptation Programmes of Action, 3–5 September 2007) . Accessed June, 22 2010, from
  15. Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhüner, B., & Zondervan, R. (2010). Earth system governance: A research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4).Google Scholar
  17. Biermann, F., & Boas, I. (2010). Preparing for a warmer world: Towards a global governance system to protect climate refugees. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. BIPSS & SFG. (2010). Dhaka Declaration on Water Security. 2nd International Workshop. Himalayan Sub-regional Cooperation on Water Security, Dhaka Bangladesh, 15–16 January 2010. (Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies and the Strategic Foresight Group).Google Scholar
  19. Biswas, A. K., & Seetharam, K. (2008). Asian Water Development Outlook, 2007: Achieving water security for Asia. Water Resources Development, 24, 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Blaikie, P. M., & Muldavin, J. S. S. (2004). Upstream, downstream, China, India: The politics of environment in the Himalyan region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 520–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bohner, J. (2006). General climatic controls and topoclimatic variations in Central and High Asia. Boreas, 35, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Browder, G. (2000). An analysis of the negotiation for the 1995 Mekong Agreement. International Negotiation, 5, 237–261.Google Scholar
  24. Chatterjee, A. (2010). WWF initiatives to study the impact of climate change on Himalayan high-altitude wetlands (HAWs). Mountain Research and Development, 30, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chinvanno, S., Souvannalath, S., Lersupavithnapa, B., Kerdsuk, V., & Thuan, N. T. H. (2008). Strategies for managing climate risks in the lower Mekong river basin: A place-based approach. In N. Leary, J. Adejuwon, V. Barros, I. Burton, J. Kulkarni, & R. Lasco (Eds.), Climate change and adaptation (pp. 228–246). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. Costa-Cabral, M., Richey, J., Goteti, G., Lettenmaier, D., Feldkotter, C., & Snidvongs, A. (2007). Landscape structure and use, climate, and water movement in the Mekong River basin. Hydrological Processes, 22, 1731–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crow, B., & Singh, N. (2009). The management of international rivers as demand grows and supplies tighten: India, China, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh. India Review, 8, 306–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. (2000). The anthropocene. IGBP Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
  29. Dixit, A. (2003). Floods and vulnerability: Need to rethink flood management. Natural Hazards, 28, 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dixit, A. (2009). Kosi embankment breach in Nepal: Need for a paradigm shift in responding to floods. Economic and Political Weekly, 7 February, 70–78.Google Scholar
  31. Dore, J., & Lazarus, K. (2009). Demarginalising the Mekong River Commission. In F. Molle, T. Foran, & M. Käkönen (Eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance (pp. 357–382). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Dore, J., & Lebel, L. (2010). Deliberation, scale and the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Environmental Management, 46, 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Draper, S., & Kundell, J. (2007). Impact of climate change on transboundary water sharing. Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, 133, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dudgeon, D. (2000). Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: Prospects for riverine biodiversity. BioScience, 50, 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eastham, J., Mpelaskoka, F., Mainuddin, M., Ticehurst, C., Dyce, P., Hodgson, G., et al. (2008). Mekong river basin water resources assessment: Impacts of climate change. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship.Google Scholar
  36. Faisal, I. M. (2002). Managing common waters in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna region. SAIS Review, 22, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Forsyth, T., & Walker, A. (2008). Forest guardian, forest destroyers: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Thailand. US: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  38. Friend, R. (2007). Securing sustainable livelihoods through wise use of wetland resources: Reflections on the experience of the Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme (MWBP). (Vientianne, Lao PDR: Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme).Google Scholar
  39. Gopal, B., & Chauhan, M. (2006). Biodiversity and its conservation in the Sundarban mangrove ecosystem. Aquatic Science, 68, 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grey, D., & Sadoff, C. W. (2007). Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 9, 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gupta, J., & Lebel, L. (2010). Access and allocation in earth system governance: Water and climate change compared. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4). doi: 10.1007/s10784-010-9139-1.
  42. Gyawali, D., & Dixit, A. (1999). Mahakali impasse and Indo-Nepal water conflict. Economic and Political Weekly, 34, 533–564.Google Scholar
  43. Gyawali, D., & Dixit, A. (2001). Water and science: Hydrological uncertainities, development aspirations, and uningrained scientific culture. Futures, 33, 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hallegatte, S. (2009). Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoa, L. T. V., Nhan, N. H., Wolanski, E., Cong, T. T., & Shigeko, H. (2007). The combined impact on the flooding in Vietnam’s Mekong river delta of local man-made structures, sea level rise and dams upstream in the river catchment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 71, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huntjens, P., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Grin, J. (2010). Climate change adaptation in European river basins. Regional Environmental Change, doi: 10.1007/s10113-009-0108-6.
  47. ICIMOD. (2009a). Water storage: A strategy for climate change adaptation in the Himalayas. sustainable mountain development, No 56. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.Google Scholar
  48. ICIMOD. (2009b). Local responses to too much and too little water in the Greater Himalayan region. Khatmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.Google Scholar
  49. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  50. IUCN, TEI, IWMI, & M-POWER. (2007). Exploring water futures together: Mekong Region Waters Dialogue. Report from regional Dialogue, Vientiane, Lao PDR. (World Conservation Union, Thailand Environment Institute, International Water Management Institute, Mekong Program on Water, Environment & Resilience).Google Scholar
  51. Iyer, R. R. (2003). Water perspectives, issues, concerns. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Iyer, R. R. (2007). Towards water wisdom: Limits, justice, harmony. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Jacobs, J. W. (2002). The Mekong River Commission: Transboundary water resources planning and regional security. The Geographical Journal, 168, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keskinen, M., Chinvanno, S., Kummu, M., Nuorteva, P., Snidvongs, A., Varis, O., et al. (2010). Climate change and water resources in the lower Mekong river basin: Putting adaptation into context. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kummu, M., Sarkkula, J., Koponen, J., & Nikula, J. (2006). Ecosystem management of the Tonle Sap lake: An integrated modelling approach. Water Resources Development, 22, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lao People’s Democratic Republic. (2009). National adaptation programme of action to climate change. Vientianne: Water Resources and Environment Administration.Google Scholar
  57. Le, T. V. H., Nguyen, H. N., Wolanski, E., Tran, T. C., & Shigeko, H. (2007). The combined impact on the flooding in Vietnam’s Mekong river delta of local man-made structures, sea-level rise, and dams upstream in the river catchment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 71, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lebel, L. (2007). Adapting to climate change. Global Asia, 2, 15–21.Google Scholar
  59. Lebel, L., & Daniel, R. (2009). The governance of ecosystem services from tropical upland watersheds. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). Politics of scale, position and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10, 18. [online] URL:
  61. Lebel, L., Grothmann, T., & Siebenhüner, B. (2010) The role of social learning in adaptiveness: Insights from water management. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4). doi: 10.1007/s10784-010-9142-6.
  62. Lebel, L., & Sinh, B. T. (2007). Politics of floods and disasters. In L. Lebel, J. Dore, R. Daniel, Y. S. Koma, & Y. S. Koma (Eds.), Democratizing water governance in the Mekong region (pp. 37–54). Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lebel, L., & Sinh, B. (2009). Risk reduction or redistribution? Flood management in the Mekong region. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 1, 23–39.Google Scholar
  64. Lebel, L., Sinh, B. T., Garden, P., Seng, S., Tuan, L. A., & Truc, D. V. (2009). The promise of flood protection: Dykes and dams, drains and diversions. In F. Molle, T. Foran, & J. Kakonen (Eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region (pp. 283–306). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  65. Ma, X., Xu, J., Luo, Y., Aggarwal, S., & Li, J. T. (2009). Response of hydrological processes to land-cover and climate changes in Kejie watershed, SW China. Hydrological Processes, 23, 1179–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Magee, D. (2006). Powershed politics: Yunnan hydropower under Great Western development. The China Quarterly, 185, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCully, P. (2007). Before the deluge: Coping with floods in a changing climate. IRN dams, river and people report 2007. Berkeley: International Rivers Network.Google Scholar
  68. Michel, D. (2009). A river runs through it: Climate change, security challenges, and shared water resources. In D. Michel & A. Pandya (Eds.), Troubled waters: Climate change, hydropolitics and transboundary resources (pp. 73–103). Washington DC: Stimson Center.Google Scholar
  69. Miller, K. (2008). Climate change and water resources: The challenges ahead. Journal of International Affairs, 61, 35–50.Google Scholar
  70. Mirza, M. M. Q., Ahmed, A. U., & Ahmad, Q. K. (Eds.). (2008). Interlinking of rivers in India: Issues and concerns. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.Google Scholar
  71. Moench, M. (2010). Responding to climate and other change processes in complex contexts: Challenges facing development of adaptive policy frameworks in the Ganga basin. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Molle, F. (2007). Scales and power in river basin management: The Chao Phraya river in Thailand. The Geographical Journal, 173, 358–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Molle, F. (2008a). Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insights from the water sector. Water Alternatives, 1, 23–40.Google Scholar
  74. Molle, F. (2008b). Why enough is never enough: The societal determinants of river basin closure. Water Resources Development, 24, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Molle, F., & Floch, P. (2008). Megaprojects and social and environmental changes: The case of the Thai “water grid”. Ambio, 37, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Molle, F., Foran, T., & Kakonen, M. (Eds.). (2009). Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  77. Mondal, S., & Wasimi, S. (2007). Evaluation of risk-related performance in water management for the Ganges delta of Bangladesh. Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, 133, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. MRC. (2009). Climate change and adaptation initiative: Framework document for implementation and management. Version: 12 June 2009. Vientianne: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  79. MWBP. (2005). Vulnerability assessment of climate risks in the lower Songkhram river basin, Thailand. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme.Google Scholar
  80. OEPP. (2000). Thailand’s initial National Communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bangkok: Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.Google Scholar
  81. Paavola, J., & Adger, N. W. (2006). Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecological Economics, 56, 594–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Palmer, M. A., Liermann, C., Nilsson, C., Florke, M., Alcamo, J., Lake, P. S., et al. (2008). Climate change and the world’s river basins: Anticipating management options. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 6, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Podesta, J., & Ogden, P. (2007). The security implications of climate change. The Washington Quarterly, 31, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Postel, S. L. (2008). The forgotten infrastructure: Safeguarding freshwater ecosystems. Journal of International Affairs, 61, 75–90.Google Scholar
  86. Rahaman, M. (2009). Principles of transboundary water resources management and Ganges treaties: An analysis. Water Resources Development, 25, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rees, G., & Collins, D. (2006). Regional differences in response of flow in glacier-fed Himalayan rivers to climate warming Hydrological Processes, 20.Google Scholar
  88. Resurreccion, B. P., Sajor, E. E., & Fajber, E. (2008). Climate adaptation in Asia: Knowledge gaps and research issues in South East Asia. Kathmandu: ISET-International.Google Scholar
  89. Rockström, J., Karlberg, L., Wani, S., Barron, J., Hatibu, N., Oweis, T., et al. (2010). Managing water in rainfed agriculture – the need for a paradigm shift. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Royal Government of Cambodia. (2006). National Adaptation Programme of Action to climate change (NAPA). Phnom Penh: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  91. Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on international rivers: A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schipper, L., & Pelling, M. (2006). Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters, 30, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sharma, R., & Shakya, N. (2006). Hydrological changes and its impact on water resources of Bagmati watershed, Nepal. Journal of Hydrology, 327, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sharma, B., & Sharma, D. (2008). Impact of climate change on water resources and glacier melt and potential adaptations for Indian agriculture. New Delhi: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  95. Sidle, R., Ziegler, A., Negishi, J., Nik, A. R., Siew, R., & Turkelboom, F. (2006). Erosion processes in steep terrain—truth, myths and uncertainties related to forest management in Southeast Asia. Forest Ecology and Management, 224, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Singh, B. (2003). A big dream of little logic. 9 March 2003. In Hindustan Times (New Delhi).Google Scholar
  97. Sinh, B. T., Lebel, L., & Tung, N. T. (2009). Indigenous knowledge and decision making in Vietnam: Living with floods in An Giang province, Mekong delta, Vietnam. In R. Shaw (Ed.), Indigenous knowledge and disaster risk reduction: From practice to policy (Chapter 30). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  98. Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2007). Power, development, and institutional change: Participatory governance in the lower Mekong basin. World Development, 35, 2161–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sokhem, P., & Sunada, K. (2006). The governance of the Tonle Sap lake, Cambodia: Integration of local, national and international levels. Water Resources Development, 22, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Subedi, S. (1999). Hydro-diplomacy in South Asia: The conclusion of the Mahakali and Genges river treaties. The American Journal of International Law, 93, 953–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tanzeema, S., & Faisal, I. M. (2001). Sharing the Ganges: A critical anlaysis of the water sharing treaties. Water Policy, 3, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thapun, A. (2009). A 2020 vision for the Mekong’s subregion. 16 June 2009. In The Nation (Bangkok).Google Scholar
  103. The Economic Times. (2010). China admits to Brahmaputra project. 22 April 2010. In The Economic Times. Google Scholar
  104. The Hindu. (2009). Expert proposes ‘eco-friendly’ method to connect rivers. 11 October 2009. In The Hindu (New Delhi).Google Scholar
  105. Thomas, D. S. G., & Twyman, C. (2005). Equity and justice in climate change adaptation amongst natural-resource-dependent societies. Global Environmental Change, 15, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. TKK & SEA-START RC. (2009). Water and climate change in the lower Mekong basin: Diagnosis and recommendations for adaptation. Water and Development Research Group, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK) and Southeast Asia START Regional Center (SEA-START RC), Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
  107. Västilä, K., Kummu, M., Sangmanee, C., & Chinvanno, S. (2010). Modelling climate change impacts on the flood pulse in the lower Mekong floodplains. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wirsing, R. (2008). The Kahsmir territorial dispute: The Indus runs through it. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 15, 225–240.Google Scholar
  109. Xu, J., Grumbine, R., Shrestha, A., Eriksson, M., Yang, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2009). The melting Himalayas: Cascading effects of climate change on water resources, biodiversity, and human livelihoods in the Greater Himalayas. Conservation Biology, 23, 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Xu, X., Lu, C., Shi, X., & Gao, S. (2008). World water tower: An atmospheric perspective. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L20815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Xu, J. C., & Rana, G. (2005). Living in the mountains. In T. Jeggle (Ed.), Know risk (pp. 196–199). Geneva: UN Inter-agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.Google Scholar
  112. Xu, J., Yang, Y., Fox, J., & Yang, X. (2007). Forest transition, its causes and environmental consequences: Empirical evidence from Yunnan of Southwest China. Tropical Ecology, 48, 1–14.Google Scholar
  113. Zawahri, N. (2009). Third party mediation of international river disputes: Lessons from the Indus river. International Negotiation, 14, 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environment Agreements, 8, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., & Xu, J. C. (2009). The rubber juggernaut. Science, 324, 1024–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Lebel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianchu Xu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ram C. Bastakoti
    • 1
    • 4
  • Amrita Lamba
    • 5
  1. 1.Unit for Social and Environmental ResearchChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Kunming Institute of BotanyKunmingChina
  3. 3.World Agroforestry CentreBeijingChina
  4. 4.Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokThailand
  5. 5.Centre for the Study of Law and GovernanceJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations