Transboundary water interaction II: the influence of ‘soft’ power

  • Mark ZeitounEmail author
  • Naho Mirumachi
  • Jeroen Warner
Original Paper


This paper seeks to broaden the analysis of transboundary water interaction, by examining and interpreting the influence of ‘soft’ power therein. The ‘soft’ power of persuasion is understood to be exercised through discursive and to a lesser extent ideational means, and is interpreted in terms of compliance related to distributive (conflictual) or integrative (consensual) ends (after Scott (1994)). The focus is on inter-state water conflicts in hegemonic political contexts, where, it is found, the ‘first among equals’ has a greater ability to exploit ‘soft’ power and to determine the outcome. ‘Soft’ power is also seen to influence the choices states make or avoid in their transboundary water interaction, which explains in part how treaties intending to manage conflict may in fact delay or perpetuate it. For example, ‘soft’ power can be used by the basin hegemon to frame inequitable forms of cooperation in a cooperative light, such that unfair and ultimately unsustainable transboundary arrangements are replicated by the international donor community. Non-hegemonic riparian states also employ their capacity of ‘soft’ power, though may find themselves with little choice other than to comply with the arrangement established by the basin hegemon. The findings stress the importance of analysts questioning claims of interaction promoted as ‘cooperative’, and of examining the ‘soft’ power plays that underlie all transboundary water arrangements. Exemplification is provided through transboundary river basins and aquifers around the globe.


Water conflict Water cooperation Hydro-hegemony Hydropolitics Power Soft power Nile Basin Initiative 


  1. Ahmad, Q. K., & Ahmed, A. U. (2004). Regional cooperation on water and environment in the Ganges basin: Bangladesh perspectives. In M. Mirza & M. Qader (Eds.), The Ganges water diversion: Environmental effects and implications. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. AI (2009a). Thirsting for justice: Palestinian access to water restricted. MDE 15/028/2009. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  3. AI (2009b). Troubled watersPalestinians denied fair access to water: Israel-occupied Palestinian territories. MDE 15/027/2009. London, Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  4. Anon. (2005, pers. comm.). Discussion with Israeli water quality scientists monitoring quality of the Jordan River. Personal communication with author, Near Jericho, West Bank. 14 September 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Anon. (2008, pers. comm.-a). Briefing of progress at the EXACT meetings of April 2008. Personal communication with author, London, 27 May 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Anon. (2008, pers. comm.-b). Briefing of progress at the EXACT meetings of June 2008. Personal communication with author, London, 24 June 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Attili, S. (2008). RE: Tiberias water management training. Personal communication by email from the head of the Palestinian Water Authority and USAID PR, and wider USAID copy list, 27 May 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Awed, I. (2008). RE: Tiberias water management training. Personal communication by email between Palestinian Water Authority staff (anonymised) and USAID employees PR and NM, 26 May 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Bachrat, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 941–952.Google Scholar
  10. Barnaby, W. (2009). Do nations go to war over water? Nature, 458, 282–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrett, S. (1994). Conflict and cooperation in managing international water resources. Policy Research Working Paper 1303. Washington, DC, World Bank Policy Research Department.Google Scholar
  12. Bílen, Ö. (2009). Turkey and water issues in the middle east: an examination of the indus, Colorado, Danube and Jordan-Israel water treaties and the Water Agenda of the 21st Century (3rd ed.). Ankara: DSI İdari ve Mali İşler Dairesi Başkanliği.Google Scholar
  13. Bruch, C., & Carroll Muffett, Wm., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Governance, natural resources, and post-conflict peacebuilding. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Brunnée, J., & Toope, S. J. (2002). The changing Nile Basin regime: Does law matter? Harvard International Law Journal, 43(1), 105–159.Google Scholar
  15. Buzan, B., Waever, O., et al. (1998). Security—a new framework for analysis. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Cascao, A. E. (2009a). Changing power relations in the Nile River Basin: Unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives, 2(2), 245–268.Google Scholar
  17. Cascao, A. E. (2009b). Political economy of water resources management and allocation in the Eastern Nile river basin. London: PhD Department of Geography, King’s College London.Google Scholar
  18. Cascao, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. In A. Earle, A. Jägerskog, & J. Ojendal (Eds.), Trasnboundary water management: Principles and practice. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  19. Chhotray, V., & Stoker, G. (2009). Governance theory and practice: A cross-disciplinary approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. COHRE. (2008a). Hostage to politics: The impact of sanctions and the blockade on the human right to water and sanitation in Gaza. Geneva: The Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.Google Scholar
  21. COHRE. (2008b). Policies of denial: Lack of access to water in the West Bank. Geneva: The Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.Google Scholar
  22. Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Courcier, R., Venot, J. P. et al. (2005). Historical transformations of the lower Jordan River basin (in Jordan): Changes in water use and projections. Comprehensive Assessment of water management in agriculture, Research Report 9. Colombo, Sri Lanka, International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Daily, T (2009a). Iraq says Turkey to double water supply. Terra Daily, 25 March 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Dalby, S. (2006). Security and environment linkages revisited. In H. G. Brauch, U. O. Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Dunnay, N. C. Behera, B. Chourou, P. Kameri-Mbote, & P. H. Liotta (Eds.), Globalization and environmental challenges: Reconceptualizing security in the 21st century. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric power: Negotiating water in the Euphrates and tigris. International Negotiations, 14(2), 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Soysa, I. (2000). The resource curse: Are civil wars driven by rapacity or paucity? In M. Berdal & D. M. Malone (Eds.), Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Delli-Priscoli, J., & Wolf, A. (2008). Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. DFID (2008). Water: An increasingly precious resource; sanitation: A matter of dignity. Policy Booklet. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  30. Dhungel, D. N. (2009). Historical eye view. In D. N. Dhungel & S. B. Pun (Eds.), The Nepal–India water relationship: Challenges (pp. 11–68). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dieperink, C. (2010). International water negotiations under asymmetry, Lessons from the Rhine chlorides dispute settlement (1931–2004), doi: 10.1007/s10784-010-9129-3.
  32. Dinar, S. (2009). Power asymmery and negotiations in international River Basins. International Negotiation, 14(2), 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Drysdale, A. (1993). Syria and Iraq—the geopathy of a relationship. GeoJournal, 28(3), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. el Musa, S. (1997). Water conflict—economics, politics, law and Palestinian–Israeli Water resources. Washington DC, USA: Institute for Palestine Studies.Google Scholar
  35. Falkner, R. (2005). American hegemony and the global environment. International Studies Review, 7, 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferguson, J. (1993). The anti-politics machine: “development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ferragina, E., & Greco, F. (2008). The Disi project: an internal/external analysis. Water International, 33(4), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischhendler, I. (2008). Ambiguity in transboundary environmental dispute resolution: The Israel–Jordanian water agreement. Journal of Peace Research, 45(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1999). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  40. Fox, C. A., & Sneddon, C. (2007). Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins: enhancing environmental security or securitizing the environment? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 7, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaffney, M. (1997). What price water marketing? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56(4), 475–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gaventa, J. (2005). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in the Appalachian Valley. Chicago, USA: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gaventa, J. (2010). Power pack: Understanding power for social change. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  44. Gleditsch, N. P., Furlong, K., et al. (2006). Conflicts over shared rivers: Resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries? Political Geography, 25, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gramsci, A. (2003 [1935]). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Hoare, Quintin and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  46. Gyawali, D. (2001). Rivers, technology and society; learning the lessons of water management in Nepal. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  47. Haddadin, M. (2001). Diplomacy on the Jordan: International conflict and negotiated resolution. Dordrecht: International Development Research Centre and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Haddadin, M. (2002). Water in the Middle East peace process. The Geographical Journal, 168(4), 324–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haddadin, M. (2006). Public presentation at full-day session on hydro-hegemony. World Water Week August 2006. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm International Water Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Haering, M., Maternowski, E. et al. (2008). The Dilmemma of the dead sea: A Reassessment of solutions from an IWRM-Perspective. Amman, Water and Environment Research and Study Centre, University of Jordan and Institute for Technology in the Tropics, Cologne University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
  51. Hajer, M. A. (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  52. Hartmann, E. (2002). Strategic scarcity: The origins and impact of environmental conflict ideas. Development Studies Institute. PhD thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
  53. Haugaard, M., & Lentner, H. (Eds.). (2006). Hegemony and power: Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  54. Headrick, D. R. (1988). The tentacles of progress: Technology transfer in the age of imperialism, 1850–1940. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Homer-Dixon, T. (2007). Terror in the weather forecast. New York City: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  56. HSI. (2004). Development of utilisation and status of water resources in Israel (Annual Hydrological Report) 2003. (Hebrew), Jerusalem: Hydrological Service of Israel.Google Scholar
  57. IMFA (2000). From contention to cooperationa case study of the Middle East Multilateral Working Group on water resources. Tel Aviv, Israel: Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archives, 17 April 2000.
  58. Jridi, A. (2002). The development of the Jordanian Jordan River basin: The main historical steps. Montpellier, France, Ecole nationale de genie rural, des eaux et des forets, centre de Montpellier (Engref), October 2002.Google Scholar
  59. Kaika, M., & Page, B. (2003). The EU water framework directive: Part I. European policy-making and the changing topography of lobbying. European Environment, 13, 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kawash, F. (2007). The water file: From Oslo to Annapolis. Al Quds daily newspaper. Ramallah, 25 November 2007.Google Scholar
  61. Keidar (2006). Discussion with Jacob Keidar, former deputy acting director general for Middle Eastern affairs and head of the multilateral peace talks on water issues. Personal communication with author, Jerusalem, June 2006.Google Scholar
  62. Kendie, D. (1999). Egypt and the hydro-politics of the blue Nile river. Northeast African Studies, 6(1–2), 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kistin, E. J., Ashton, P. J. et al. (2009). An overview of the content and historical context of the international freshwater agreements that South Africa has entered into with neighbouring countries. International Environmental Agreements forthcoming (accepted 10 Nov 2008).Google Scholar
  64. Kistin, E. J., & Ashton, P. J. (2008). Adapting to change in transboundary rivers: An analysis of treaty flexibility on the Orange-Senqu river basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(3), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kolars, J. F., & Mitchell, W. A. (1991). The Euphrates River and the Southeastern Anatolia development project. Naff, Thomas, Water—The Middle East imperative. Carbondale, USA: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Kramer, A. (2008). Regional water cooperation and peacebuilding in the Middle East. Initiative for Peacebuilding Regional Cooperation on Environment, Economy and Natural Resource Management Cluster—Regional Case Study: Middle East. Brussels, Adelphi Research.Google Scholar
  67. Lautze, J., Reeves, M., et al. (2005). Water allocation, climate change and sustainable peace—The Israeli proposal. Water International, 30(2), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Le Billon, P. (2007). Scales, chains and commodities: Mapping out “Resource Wars”. Geopolitics, 12(1), 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lindemann, S. (2005). Water regime formation in Europe: A research framework with lessons from the Rhine and Elbe river basins. From conflict to collective action: Institutional change and management options to govern transboundary watercourses. Berlin, Germany: Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik.Google Scholar
  70. Lonergan, S., & Brooks, D. (1994). Watershed: The role of fresh water in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Council.Google Scholar
  71. Lowi, M. (1993). Water and power—the politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A radical view, (2nd ed.). Hampshire. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  73. Lukes, S. (2005b). Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lustick, I. S. (2002). Hegemony and the riddle of nationalism: The dialectics of nationalism and religion in the Middle East. Logos, 1(3 (Summer 2002)), 18–44.Google Scholar
  75. Markel, D. (2004a). Monitoring and managing lake kinneret and its watershed, Northern Israel—a response to environmental, anthropogenic and political constraints. unpublished.Google Scholar
  76. Mazo, J. (2010). Climate conflict: How global warming threatens security and what to do about it. London: Taylor and Francis, Ltd.Google Scholar
  77. McCaffrey, S. (2007). The law of international watercourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Milman, A., & Schott, C. (2010). Beneath the surface: Intranational institutions and management of the United States—Mexico transboundary Santa Cruz aquifer. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mirumachi, N. (2007). The politics of water transfer between South Africa and Lesotho: Bilateral cooperation in the Lesotho Highlands water project. Water International, 32(4), 558–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, and modernity. London: University of California Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
  81. Raadgever, G. T (Tom)., Mostert, E., et al. (2008). Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: Do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society 13(1): Article 14 [on-line].Google Scholar
  82. Mustafa, D. (2002). To each according to his power? Participation, access, and vulnerability in irrigation and flood management in Pakistan. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Newell, P. (2008). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 2008(34), 507–529.Google Scholar
  84. Nile-COM (2006). Draft agreement on the Nile basin cooperative framework. Extraordinary Meeting of the Nile-COM. Addis Ababa, 30–31 March 2006.Google Scholar
  85. Nye, J. (1990). Born to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  86. Oğuzlu, T. (2007). Soft power in Turkish foreign policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 61(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Phillips, D. & Woodhouse, M. (2009). Benefit sharing in the Nile river basin: Strategies for fresh water use at the country and sub-basin levels. Entebbe, Report prepared for the Socio-economic Development and Benefit Sharing Unit of the Nile Basin Initiative.Google Scholar
  88. Qutub, S. A., Saleemi, A. R. et al. (2003). Water sharing conflicts within countries, and possible solutions. WASSA Project Reports, Volume 2. Honolulu, Water and Security in South Asia, South Asia Program—School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, and Global Environment and Energy in the 21st Century.Google Scholar
  89. Rashid, A. L. (2005). Address to the conference from the minister of water resources of Iraq. Seminar on agricultural water in the middle east, SIWI world water week, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm International Water Institute and the Israel Palestine Centre for Research and Information, 24 August 2005.Google Scholar
  90. Rende, M. (2005). Statement addressed publicly to the Iraqi Minister of Water Resources, by the representative of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Seminar on agricultural water in the middle east, SIWI World Water Week, Stockholm International Water Institute and the Israel Palestine Centre for Research and Information, 24 August 2005.Google Scholar
  91. Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.). (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
  93. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Scott, J. (Ed.). (1994). Power: Critical concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Scott, J. (2001). Power. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  96. Seide, W. M. (2010). On Nile, Ethiopia goes soft to get tough. Fortune Newspaper. Addis Ababa, 521, 25 April 2010.Google Scholar
  97. Selby, J. (2003a). Dressing up domination as ‘Co-operation’: The case of Israeli–Palestinian water relations. Review of International Studies, 29(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Selby, J. (2003b). Water, power and politics in the middle east—the other Israeli–Palestinian conflict. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  99. Shatanawi, M. (2007). Public Address: Water quality problems in the water supply systems in the Arab region. International conference on sustainable development adn management of water resources in Palestine, Amman, August 2007, House of Water and the Environment.Google Scholar
  100. Shuval, H. (2006). Water in the Middle East: Conflicting interests and cooperative approaches—An Israeli approach to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian water issues. Water and Environment Workshop, Prague, 12–14 June 2006.Google Scholar
  101. Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography, 25, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sosland, J. K. (2007). Cooperating rivals: The Riparian politics of the Jordan River Basin. New York, USA: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  103. Stephan, R. M. (Ed.). (2008). Transboundary aquifers: Managing a vital resource: The UNILC draft articles on the law of transboundary aquifers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.Google Scholar
  104. Tarlock, D. A. (2008). Water security, fear mitigation and international water law. Hamline Law Review, 31(3), 704–728.Google Scholar
  105. Trondalen, J. M. (2008). Water and peace for the people: Possible solutions to water disputes in the Middle East. UNESCO-IHP Water and Conflict Resolution Series. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  106. Turton, A., & Funke, N. (2008). Hydro hegemony in the context of the Orange River Basin. Water Policy, 10(Special Issue No. 2), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tvedt, (2004). The River Nile in the age of the British: Political ecology & the quest for economic power. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
  108. UNDP (2006). Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. Human Development Report 2006. New York, USA, United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  109. UNEP (2003). Desk study on the environment in the occupied Palestinian territories. United Nations Environment Program
  110. van der Zaag, P. (2007). Possibilities and constraints of rainfed agriculture in Africa: securing food stocks by slowing the water flow. Paper prepared for the NethCID symposium, Delft 22 March 2007.Google Scholar
  111. Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271–288.Google Scholar
  112. Warner, J., & van Buuren, A. (2009). Multi-stakeholder learning and fighting on the River Scheldt. International Negotiation, 14, 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Waterbury, J. (2002). The Nile: National determinants of collective action. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Wegerich, K. (2008). Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya Basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weinthal, E. (2001). Sins of omission: Constructing negotiating sets in the Aral Sea Basin. Journal of Environment and Development, 10(1), 50–79.Google Scholar
  116. Wolf, A. T. (2007). Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 32, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. World Bank (2009). West Bank and Gaza: Assessment of restrictions on Palestinian water sector development sector note April 2009. Middle East and North Africa Region—Sustainable Development. Report No. 47657-GZ Washington, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
  118. WWF-DFID (2010). International architecture for transboundary water resources management: Policy analysis and recommendations. London, Worldwide Fund for Nature and the UK Department for International Development, with Pegasys Strategy and Development, and the UNESCO Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, February 2010.Google Scholar
  119. Young, O. R. (1982). Regime dynamics: The rise and fall of international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zartman, W. I., & Rubin, J. Z. (Eds.). (2002). Power & Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  121. Zeitoun, M. (2008a). Power and water: The hidden politics of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  122. Zeitoun, M. (2008b). Review of Trondalen, J.M. water and peace for the people: Possible solutions to water disputes in the Middle East. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 292–294.Google Scholar
  123. Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 8, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International DevelopmentUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKing’s CollegeLondonUK
  3. 3.Disaster StudiesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Public AdministrationErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations