Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation

Original Paper

Abstract

Whether the inter-state and sub-national tensions over transboundary waters will lead to greater conflict or increased cooperation remains a hotly debated issue. Most work on the subject situates transboundary water conflict and transboundary water cooperation at opposing ends of a continuum. The examination of either conflict or cooperation, we argue, refutes the reality of the vast majority of contexts where cooperation and conflict actually co-exist, and perpetuates the paradigm that any conflict is ‘bad’, and that all forms of cooperation are ‘good’. The efforts of the international water academic and practitioner communities may be better served through a combined reading of conflict and cooperation as transboundary water interaction. Mirumachi’s Transboundary Waters Interaction NexuS is offered as a robust method demonstrating that simultaneous consideration of conflict and cooperation is both insightful and possible. Transboundary water interaction is shown to be an inherently political process determined by the broader political context. We examine evidence suggesting that uncritical acceptance of traditional forms of ‘cooperative’ arrangements may in fact sustain the conflict it was intended to transform. Several other less well-known faces of ‘cooperation’ are discussed in detail, with examples of narrow, token and coercive cooperation derived from inter-state relations on the Jordan, Nile and Ganges rivers. With a view to paving the way for improved transboundary water sharing and governance, subjectively negative, neutral and positive forms of interaction are defined, and linked with a first approximation of their potential driving forces.

Keywords

Water conflict Water cooperation Hegemony Hydro-hegemony Power Hydropolitics Jordan River Ganges River Nile River 

References

  1. Allouche, J. (2004). Water nationalism: An explanation of the past and present conflicts in Central Asia, the Middle East and the Indian Subcontinent? PhD Thesis, Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales, Université de Genève.Google Scholar
  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, S. (1998). On the theory and diplomacy of environmental treaty-making. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernauer, T. (2002). Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Science, 64, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brochmann, M., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2006). Conflict, cooperation and good governance in international river basins. International Conference—Governance and the Global Water System: Institutions, actors, scales of water governance facing the challenges of global change. Global Water Systems Project, Bonn, Germany, 20–23 June 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Brochmann, M., & Hensel, P. R. (2008). Peaceful management of international river claims. Paper Prepared for the 49th Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. San Francisco, 26–29 March 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D. L., & Ashman, D. (1996). Participation, social capital, and intersectoral problem solving: African and Asian cases. World Development, 9, 1467–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruns, B. (2003). Developing an extended ladder of participation. RCSD Conference—Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices. Chiang Mai, 11–14 July 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Butts, K. H. (1997). The strategic importance of water. Parameters. US Army War College Quarterly, 27 (Spring 1997), 65–83.Google Scholar
  10. Cascao, A. (2003). Hydropolitics in Ethiopia. Master’s Thesis, Lisbon University.Google Scholar
  11. Cascao, A. (2008). Counter-Hegemony in the Nile River Basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conca, K. (2006a). The new face of water conflict. No. 3 in the Navigating peace series. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Environmental Change and Security Programme, July 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Conca, K. (2006b). The new face of water conflict, No. 3 in the Navigating peace series. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Environmental Change and Security Programme, July 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Craig, J. G. (1993). The nature of co-operation. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  15. Daoudy, M. (2004). Negotiating water in the Middle East: A new analytical framework. Paper Prepared for UNESCO/AUB Symposium on Challenges Facing Water Resources Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. American University of Beirut, 7–9 October 2004.Google Scholar
  16. Daoudy, M., & Kistin, E. (2008). Beyond water conflict: Evaluating the effects of international water cooperation. Paper Prepared for the 49th Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. San Francisco, 26–29 March 2008.Google Scholar
  17. de Waal, A. (2007). Darfur and the failure of the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 83(6), 1039–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delli-Priscoli, J. (1996). Conflict resolution, collaboration and management in international water resource issues. Alternative dispute resolution series, IWR Working Paper 96-ADR-WP-6. Alexandria, USA: Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, May 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Delli-Priscoli, J. (1998a). Public involvement; conflict management; and dispute resolution in water resources and environmental decision making. In: J. L. Creightion, C. M. Dunning, J. Delli-Priscoli, & D. B. Ayres (Eds.), Public involvement and dispute resolution: A reader on the second decade of experience at the institute for water resources. Alexandria, USA: Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers. IWR Report 98-R-5.Google Scholar
  20. Delli-Priscoli, J. (1998b). From hot-tub to war: Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the U.S. Corps of Engineers. In: J. L. Creightion, C. M. Dunning, J. Delli-Priscoli, & D. B. Ayres (Eds.), Public involvement and dispute resolution: A reader on the second decade of experience at the institute for water resources. Alexandria, USA: Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers. IWR Report 98-R-5.Google Scholar
  21. Dombrowski, I. (2003). Water accords in the Middle East peace process: Moving towards cooperation? In: H. G. Brauch, P. H. Liotta, A. Marquina, P. Rogers & M. el Sayed (Eds.), Security and environment in the MediterraneanConceptualising security and environmental conflict. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Hexagon Series No. 1.Google Scholar
  22. Dombrowski, I. (2005). Conflict, cooperation, and institutions in international water management. PhD Thesis, Leipzig University.Google Scholar
  23. Eissa, S. (2008). International law and hydro-hegemony in the Nile Basin: A Sudanese perspective. Water Policy, 10 (Supplement 2).Google Scholar
  24. el-Tom, A. O. (2007). UN Ban Ki-Moon and his drought thesis of Darfur conflict. Sudan Tribune 13 (November 2007).Google Scholar
  25. Falkenmark, M., Berntell, A., Jägerskog, A., Lundqvist, J., Matz, M., & Tropp, H. (2007). On the verge of a new water scarcity: A call for good governance and human ingenuity. Brief, S. P. Stockholm, Stockholm International Water Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Falkenmark, M., & Rockstom, J. (2000). Water in emergencies. War and water. Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  27. Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3 Summer 1995), 379–414.Google Scholar
  29. Feitelson, E. (2006). Impediments to the management of shared aquifers: A political economy perspective. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feitelson, E., & Haddad, M. (2000). Management of shared groundwater resources: The Israeli-Palestinian case with an international perspective. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Council and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Fischhendler, I. (2008). Ambiguity in transboundary environmental dispute resolution: The Israel–Jordanian water agreement. Journal of Peace Research, 45(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, C. A., & Sneddon, C. (2007). Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins: Enhancing environmental security or securitizing the environment? International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics, 7, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. GCI. (2000). National sovereignty and international watercourses. Renens, Switzerland: Green Cross International.Google Scholar
  34. Gerlak, A. K. (2007). Lesson learning and trans-boundary waters: A look at the global environmental facility’s international waters program. Water Policy, 9, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gyawali, D. (2001). Rivers, technology and society: Learning the lessons of water management in Nepal. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  36. Hartmann, E. (2002). Strategic scarcity: The origins and impact of environmental conflict ideas. PhD Thesis, Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  37. Hensel, P. R., & Brochmann, M. (2007). Armed conflict over international rivers: The onset and militarization of river claims. Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, March 2007, Chicago.Google Scholar
  38. Homer-Dixon, T. (1995a). Environmental scarcity and violent conflict: The case of Gaza. Project on environment, population and security. Washington, DC, USA: American Association for the Advancement of Science and the University of Toronto, June 1995.Google Scholar
  39. Homer-Dixon, T. (1995b). On the threshold—Environmental changes as causes of acute conflict. In S. M. Lynn-Jones & S. E. Miller (Eds.), Global dangers: Changing dimensions of international security. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jägerskog, A. (2003). Why states cooperate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River basin. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  41. Kameri-Mbote, P. (2006). Water, conflict, and cooperation: Lessons from the Nile River Basin. No. 4 in the Navigating Peace series, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Environmental Change and Security Programme, January 2007.Google Scholar
  42. Ki-Moon, B. (2007). What I saw in Darfur. The Washington Post 14, September 2007, A13.Google Scholar
  43. Kistin, E. (2007). Transboundary cooperation in SADC: From Concept to Implementation. Paper prepared for the 8th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium. Lusaka, Zambia, 30 October–3 November 2007.Google Scholar
  44. Levy, M. (2001). A Debate (comments on Levy’s Time for a Third Wave of Environment and Security Scholarship). Environmental Change and Security Program Report No.2. Homer-Dixon, T., Porter, G., & Goldstone, J. (Eds.), Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  45. Lewis, L. (2007). Water shortages are likely to be trigger for wars, says UN chief Ban Ki Moon. Times Online. London, World News, 4 December 2007.Google Scholar
  46. Lowi, M. (1993). Water and power—The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River Basin. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mac Ginty, R., Muldoon, O. T., & Ferguson, N. (2007). No war, no peace: Northern Ireland after the agreement. Political Psychology, 28(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mehta, L. (2001). The manufacture of popular perceptions of scarcity: Dams and water-related narratives in Gujara, India. World Development, 29(12), 2025–2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Messerschmid, C. (2007). Hydro-hegemony in shared Israeli, Palestinian groundwater resources: What price cooperation? International Conference on Sustainable Development and Management of Water Resources in Palestine. Amman, August 2007.Google Scholar
  50. Middle East Quarterly. (September 1997). Boutros Boutros-Ghali: “I Support the Algerian Government”. Middle East Quarterly.Google Scholar
  51. Mirumachi, N. (2007). Fluxing relations in water history: Conceptualizing the range of relations in transboundary river basin. Pasts and Futures of Water: Proceedings from the 5th International Water History Association Conference. Tampere, Finland, 13–17 June 2006.Google Scholar
  52. Mirumachi, N., & Allan, J. A. (2007). Revisiting transboundary water governance: Power, conflict cooperation and the political economy. Proceedings from CAIWA International Conference on Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Scarcity. Basel, Switzerland, 12–15 November 2007.Google Scholar
  53. Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2008). Co-existing conflict and cooperation in transboundary waters. Paper prepared for the 49th annual Conference of the International Studies Association. San Francisco, 26–29 March 2008.Google Scholar
  54. Moench, M., Dixit, A., Janakarajan, S., Rathore, M. S., & Mudrakartha, S. (2003). The fluid mosaic—Water governance in the context of variability, uncertainty and change. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  55. Mohieldeen, Y. (2008). Sudan’s Nile waters and the eastern Nile basin: Hydropolitics in a politicized environment. PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
  56. Najam, A. (2002). International environmental negotiation: A strategy for the south. In L. Susskind, W. Moomaw & K. Gallagher (Eds.), Transboundary environmental negotiation: New approaches to global cooperation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Ohlsson, L., & Turton, A. (1999). The turning of a screw: Social resource scarcity as a bottle-neck in adaption to water scarcity. SOAS Water Issues Study Group, School of Oriental and African Studies/King’s College—London (Occasional Paper 19).Google Scholar
  58. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Phillips, D., Attili S., McCaffrey S., & Murray J. (2007a). The Jordan River Basin: 1. Clarification of the allocations in the Johnston plan. Water International, 31(5), 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phillips, D., Attili S., McCaffrey S., & Murray J. (2007b) The Jordan River Basin: 2. Potential future allocations to the Co-riparians. Water International, 31(5), 39–62.Google Scholar
  61. Phillips, D., Daoudy, M., Öjendal, J., Turton, A., & McCaffrey, S. (2006). Trans-boundary water cooperation as a tool for conflict prevention and broader benefit-sharing, Global Development Studies No. 4. Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  62. Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on international rivers: A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
  64. Scheumann, W., & Alker, M. (2008). The way towards joint management of Africa’s transboundary aquifers. Groundwater and Climate in Africa, Conference organised by Ministry of Water and Environment of Uganda. University College London, and UNESCO, Kampala, June 24–28, 2008.Google Scholar
  65. Selby, J. (2003). Dressing up domination as ‘co-operation’: The case of Israeli-Palestinian water relations. Review of International Studies, 29(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. SIWI. (2006). Full-day session on hydro-hegemony. World Water Week August 2006, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  67. Sosland, J. K. (2007). Cooperating rivals: The riparian politics of the Jordan River basin. New York, USA: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  68. Takele, B. G. (2004). The hydropolitics of transboundary river water resources development: The case of the Blue Nile Basin in Ethiopia. Master’s Thesis, Department of Geography, King’s College London.Google Scholar
  69. Thomson, M. (2005). Ex-UN chief warns of water wars. BBC News. London, UK, 2 February 2005 [on-line].Google Scholar
  70. UN. (2001). Secretary-General asks United States geographers to work with him to tackle climate change problems, Environmental Degradation and Sustainable Development. UN Press Release SG/SM/7732.Google Scholar
  71. UN. (2006). Water: A shared responsibility. World Water Development Report No. 2. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, World Water Assessment Programme, UN Water.Google Scholar
  72. UNDP. (2006). Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis. Human Development Report 2006. New York, USA: Author.Google Scholar
  73. UNESCO. (2004). From potential conflict to co-operation potential: Promoting water as a catalyst for peace through capacity building, research and technical assistance. Paris, France, A contribution of UNESCO’s International Hydrological Programme to the World Water Assessment Programme—2nd Phase.Google Scholar
  74. USACE. (1996). Conflict resolution, collaboration and management in international water resource issues. Alternative Dispute Resolution Series, Working Paper #6. Alexandria, USA: Author.Google Scholar
  75. Vasquez, J. A., Johnson, J. T., Jaffe, S., & Stamato, L. (1995). Learning conflict resolution in the Post-Cold War Era. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  76. Warner, J. (2004). Water, wine, vinegar and blood. On politics, participation, violence and conflict over the hydrosocial contract. Proceedings from Water and Politics Conference (26–27 February 2004, Chap. 3). Marseilles, France, 15 March 2004.Google Scholar
  77. Waterbury, J. (2002). The Nile: National determinants of collective action. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wolf, A. (2008). Healing the enlightenment rift: Rationality, spirituality, and shared waters. International Affairs, 61(2).Google Scholar
  79. Wolf, A. T. (2004). Freshwater transboundary dispute database. Corvallis, OR, USA: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  80. Wolf, A. T. (2007). Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 32, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolf, A. T., Kramer, A., Carius, A., & Dabelko, G. D. (2005). Managing water conflict and cooperation. State of the World 2005: Redefining Global Security, Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  82. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60.Google Scholar
  83. Young, O. (2003). Environmental governance: The role of institutions in causing and confronting environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics, 3(4), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zawahri, N. (2008). Capturing the nature of cooperation, unstable cooperation, and conflict over international rivers: The story of the Indus, Yarmouk, Euphrates, and Tigris rivers. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(3), 286–310.Google Scholar
  85. Zeitoun, M. (2007). The conflict vs. cooperation paradox: Fighting over or sharing of Palestinian-Israeli groundwater? Water International, 32(1), 105–120.Google Scholar
  86. Zeitoun, M. (2008). Power and water: The hidden politics of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  87. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water policy, 8, 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grantham Institute on Climate Change and the EnvironmentLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations