Śāntarakṣita’s Criticism of Causal Activity (vyāpāra)

Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The term nirvyāpāra, which literally means “non-activity”, can be a key point in understanding Śāntarakṣita’s causal theory. It is a necessary step in his argument for the doctrine of Dependent Origination. This paper presents the views of the orthodox Indian schools that endorses the existence of causal activity and examines how Śāntarakṣita establishes the idea of non-activity (nirvyāpāra) mainly by discussing his objection to causal activity. In addition, the paper also briefly investigate the history of the concept of “non-activity” in Buddhist philosophy, trying to show that Śāntarakṣita contributes to this view by explicitly spelling it out and providing a detailed argument for it.

Keywords

Śāntarakṣita Kamalaśīla Kumārila vyāpāra nirvyāpāra 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AKBh Abhidharmakośabhāṣya [of Vasubandhu]. (1975) Edited by P. Pradhan, Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu. (rev. 2nd ed.) Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Center.Google Scholar
  2. Akimoto, M. (2004). Buddhist definition of existence: Kāritra to Arthakriyā. In S. Hino & T. Wada (Eds.), Three mountains and seven rivers: Prof. Musashi Tachikawa’s felicitation volume (pp. 107–116). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  3. Mikogami, E. (1979). Some remarks on the concept of Arthakriyā. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 7(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, W., & Goodman,C. (2017). “Śāntarakṣita’s view of actions and results in Tattvasaṅgraha. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  5. Gold, J. C. (2015). Paving the great way: Vasubandhu’s unifying Buddhist philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, On Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Karunadasa, Y. (1996). The Dhamma theory: Philosophical cornerstone of the Abhidhamma, The Wheel Publication No. 412/413. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  8. La Vallée Poussin, Louis de, & Sangpo, G. L. (2012). Abhidharmakośa-Bhāṣya of Vasubandhu: The treasury of the Abhidharma and its commentary. Delhi: Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  9. Majjhima-Nikāya. The Majjhima-Nikāya, 3 vols, vol. 1 edited by V. Trenckner in 1888; vols. 2 and 3 edited by Robert Chalmers in 1896 and 1899. London: The Pāli Text Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. McClintock, S. L. (2010). Omniscience and the rhetoric of reason: Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla on rationality, argumentation, & religious authority. Boston: Wisdom.Google Scholar
  11. MMK Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Sanskrit from Siderits and Katsura (2013).Google Scholar
  12. Monier-Williams, M. (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary: Etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to Cognate indo-european languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ñāṇamoli, B., & Bodhi, B. (Trans.). (2005). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom.Google Scholar
  14. Jha, G. (1983). Ślokavārttika: Translated from the original sanskrit with extracts from the commentaries “Kāśikā” of Sucarita Miśra and “Nyāyaratnākara” of Pārtha Sārathi Miśra. Delhi: Sri Satguru (Reprint; first published in Calcutta, 1900).Google Scholar
  15. Jha, G. (1986). The Tattvasaṅgraha of Shāntarakṣita with the commentary of Kamalashīla. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass (Reprint; first published in Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, 1937–1939).Google Scholar
  16. PS(V)    Pramāṇasamuccaya (PS) and -vṛtti (PSV) of Dignāga (2005). Chapter 1 on perception. Sanskrit text in E. Steinkellner, Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya, Chapter 1. A hypothetical reconstruction of the Sanskrit text with the help of the two Tibetan translations on the basis of the hitherto known Sanskrit fragments and the linguistic materials gained from Jinendrabuddhi’s Ṭīkā. Available online http://www.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/Mat/dignaga_PS_1.pdf (last accessed 4 May 2017).
  17. Sato, A. 佐藤晃. (2011). 刹那滅論を前提とした因果關係は成立可能か,東洋の思想と宗敎(28), 2011–03, 54–74.Google Scholar
  18. Shimizu, K. 清水公庸. (1983). 因果をめぐる論争, 南都仏教,51, 1–35.Google Scholar
  19. Siderits, M., & Katsura, S. (2013). Nāgārjuna’s middle way. Boston: Wisdom.Google Scholar
  20. ŚV    Ślokavārttika [of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa]. (1898). Edited by Rāma Śāstrī Tailaṅga. The Mīmāṃsā-Śloka-Vārttika of Kumārila Bhatta with the commentary called Nyayaratnakara by Partha sārathi miśra. Benares: Chowkhambā Sanskrit Book-Depot.Google Scholar
  21. T    Taishō Edition of Chinese Tripiṭaka in tripitaka.cbeta.org.Google Scholar
  22. TS(P)    Tattvasaṃgraha [of Śāntarakṣita] and Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā [of Kamalaśīla].Google Scholar
  23. (1) Dwārikādās Śāstrī, ed. Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Shāntarakṣita with the Commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Shri Kamalashīla (two volumes, continuous pagination), Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati, 1968. Reprint 1997 and 2006.Google Scholar
  24. (2) Embar Krishnamacharya, ed. Tattvasaṃgraha of Śāntarakṣita with the Commentary of Kamalaśīla. 2 vols. Gaekwad’s Oriental Series 30-31, Baroda: Central Library, 1926. Reprint, Baroda, 1984 and 1988.Google Scholar
  25. (3) Tibetan Version of TS(P) (Abbreviated as Tib.)Google Scholar
  26. TS: Guṇākaraśrībhadra, Dpal lha btsan po, and Zhi ba ’od, trans., 1050. Dekho na nyid bsdus pa’i tshig le’ur byaspa. sNar thang 3756 ’e 1–146a; sDe dge 4266 ze 1–133a6; co ne ze 1–133a7; Peking 5764 ‘e 1–159a5. Tenjur (bstan ‘gyur), vol. 107. Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center, 2015.Google Scholar
  27. TSP: Devendrabhadra and Grags ‘byor shes rab, trans., 1100. Dekho na nyid bsdus pa’i bka”grel. sNar thang 3757 ‘‘e-ye 146a–385; sDe dge 4267 ze-’’e 133b1–331a7; co ne ze-’e 133a7–352a7; Peking 5765 ‘e-ye 159b2–495a7. Tenjur (bstan ‘gyur), vol. 107. Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Yao, Z. (Forthcoming). Effective action (arthakriyā), activity (kāritra), and non-activity (nirvyāpāra). Journal of Buddhist Philosophy.Google Scholar
  29. YBh Yogācārabhūmi attributed Asaṅga or Maitreyanātha. (1961). Sanskrit fragments of the Cintāmayībhūmi Section from A. Wayman, The Paramārtha Gāthā according to Asaṅga. In his Analysis of the Śrāvakabhūmi Manuscript. Berkeley: University of California Press 1961, 163–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyChinese Academy of Social SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations