Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 39, Issue 4–5, pp 461–477 | Cite as

The Argumentative Value of Āgamic Quotations in the Sphoṭasiddhi by Bharata Miśra



In a rare book published in Trivandrum (1927), entitled Sphoṭasiddhiḥ Bharatamiśrapranītā, we find an interesting argument in defense of sphoṭa-theory, based on āgamic quotations, especially RV X, 71, 4 (the stanza where the poet describes his own activity in perceiving the essence of Speech as like a beloved woman naked). The main idea is that the numerous word sphoṭas, as an atemporal multiplicity, free from any sensuous quality, were the objects of the Ṛṣis’ primordial intuition. So the internal diversity of the Veda is not a mere subjective convention in order to adapt the highest truth to limited human minds. The absolute brahman has an objective cosmogonical power of which the temporal mutiplicity is only the very last result. There is also an intermediate ideal multiplicity, which the Veda, as eternal and transcending the guru-śiṣya transmission, consists in.


Sphoṭa Dhvani Āgama Jāti Ṛṣi Bharata Miśra Veda Ontology Universal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Primary Sources

  1. Yāska: Nirukta, ed. & transl. by L. Sarup, Lahore, 1927 (reprinted Varanasi, 1967).Google Scholar
  2. Patañjali: Mahābhāṣya, ed. by Vedavrat, 5 vol., Haryāṇā Sāhitya Saṃstām (Rohtak), 1962–1963.Google Scholar
  3. Bhartṛhari: Vākyapadīya Brahmakāṇḍa avec la Vṛtti de Harivṛṣabha, ed. & transl. by M. Biardeau, Paris, 1964. Abbreviated “VP”.Google Scholar
  4. Maṇḍana Miśra: La démonstration du sphoṭa (Sphoṭasiddhi), ed. & transl. by M. Biardeau, Pondichéry, 1958.Google Scholar
  5. Maṇḍana Miśra: The Sphoṭasiddhi with the Gopalikā, ed. by Ramanatha S. K. Sastri, 1931.Google Scholar
  6. Bharata Miśra, Sphoṭasiddhi, ed. by K. S. Sastri, Trivandrum, 1927.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Aklujkar, A. (1991). Bhartṛhari’s concept of the Veda. In M. M. Deshpande (Ed.), Panels of the VIIth World Sankrit conference (vol. V, pp. 1–18). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Aklujkar A.: Veda revelation according to Bhartṛhari. In: Chaturvedi, M. (eds) Bhartṛhari: Language, thought and reality, pp. 1–97. Motilal Barnasidass, Dehli (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Biardeau M.: Théorie de la connaissance et philosophie de la parole dans le brahmanisme classique. Mouton & Co, Paris (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Bronkhorst, J. (1991). Bhartṛhari on sphoṭa and universals. Études Asiatiques, XLV(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  5. Bronkhorst, J. (1992). L’absolu dans le Vākyapadîya et son lien avec le Madhyamaka. Études Asiatiques, XLVI(1), 56–92.Google Scholar
  6. Brough, J. (1951). Theories of general linguistics in the Sanskrit Grammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society, 50, 27–46. (Reprinted from A reader on the Sanskrit Grammarians, pp. 402–414, by J. F. Staal, Ed., 1972, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)Google Scholar
  7. Coward H.G.: Sphoṭa theory of language. A philosophical analysis. Motilal Barnasidass, Delhi (1980)Google Scholar
  8. Coward, H. G., Potter, K., & Raja, K. K. (1990). The encyclopedia of Indian philosophy, vol. V. The philosophy of the Grammarians. Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.Google Scholar
  9. Dravid R.R.: The problem of universals in Indian philosophy. Motilal Barnasidass, Delhi (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Iyer K.A.S.: The doctrine of sphoṭa. The Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute, 5(2), 121–147 (1948)Google Scholar
  11. Jakobson, R. (1976). Six leçons sur le son et le sens. Paris: éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  12. Joshi S.D.: Introduction. In: Joshi, S.D. (eds) The Sphoṭanirṇaya of Kauṇḍa Bhaṭṭa, pp. 1–93. University of Poona, Poona (1967)Google Scholar
  13. Palsule G.B. et al.: Bharata Miśra. In: Potter, K. (eds) The encyclopedia of Indian philosophy, vol. V. The philosophy of the Grammarians, pp. 231–234. Motilal Barnasidass, Delhi (1990)Google Scholar
  14. Sastri G.: A study in the dialectics of sphota. Dehli, Motilal Barnasidass (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, UMR 7528 “Mondes indien et iranien”Aix en ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations